Letter: Frustrated voters over forced party identification fuels call for election reforms

Rob Anderson, sponsor of the Restore Election Confidence Initiative, addresses the troubling reality that hangs over many voters.


Rob Anderson addresses the troubling reality that hangs over many voters

Rob Anderson
Restore Election Confidence Initiative

As the 2024 presidential primary ballots hit mailboxes, a troubling reality hangs over many voters: if they don’t align with a major political party, boldly displayed on the outside of their ballots, their votes won’t count. This conundrum demands immediate attention, emphasizing the urgent need for election reform.

Rob Anderson, Reform Clark County
Rob Anderson

The stark truth is that choosing not to declare a party preference translates to a disregarded vote — a message resoundingly delivered by those in power. While Secretary of State Steve Hobbs is the face of this decision, we shouldn’t be naive; many others have jumped aboard with this detrimental choice that will undoubtedly result in lower voter participation. The decision reflects a broader mentality in our state’s political landscape, particularly within the influential circles of the ruling elite.

The power brokers in charge are advocating for mandatory political party identification on the outside of your ballot, a move that undermines the principles of an open, fair, yet private voting process. Even staunch independents find themselves pigeonholed into one category or another. It’s a binary choice, and if you don’t conform, you’re left with no say at all.

This top-down, decision-making approach mirrors a pervasive mentality in various election departments across the state. It suggests a belief that those in charge know better than the voters, and they will manipulate the process as they see fit, fostering a culture where dissent is punished, and compliance is demanded.

So, how do we break free from this restrictive system? The solution lies in reclaiming control over our elections, starting at the county level, where our voices matter most.

In Clark County, a potent way to drive this change is by supporting and advancing the Restore Election Confidence Initiative to the November ballot. This initiative, rooted in common-sense reforms, is designed to elevate our elections, ensuring they better serve the people of Clark County. The REC Initiative advocates for increased transparency, accountability, and a system where every legitimate vote is counted. It’s about empowering voters and rebuilding trust in our election processes. It won’t fix the current forced party affiliation debacle but it will tell those making these kinds of decisions that we demand a voice in our election processes.

Unlike the recent statewide decision on primary ballots, Clark County residents want more than to be mere spectators. We demand a say in how our elections are run, and we expect a higher standard of performance from our elections officials.

Let’s come together and reshape our electoral system, putting control back where it truly belongs – in the hands of the people.

Explore one of the over 40 petition station locations across Clark County. Please sign, share, and consider contributing to this cause with your time or a donation.

I personally committed not just to complain but to find sensible solutions that can genuinely improve our elections. I invite you to do the same before May 25, ensuring that 35,000 signatures will move the Restore Election Confidence Initiative forward to be decided by the voters in the 2024 General Election. Your support is crucial; let’s seize the moment and make our elections better here in Clark County.

For more info go to www.restorevotes.com


Also read:

4 Comments

  1. Mark Engleman

    Improving Election System integrity is a foundational endeavor.
    Without this significantly fixed, then all other efforts to reduce government and corporatist corruption and incompetence will be compromised.

    Thanks to Rob Anderson for critical leadership and vision at this time in our county.

    Reply
  2. burtonw

    I’m not quite sure what point the letter writer is making. In Washington, voters don’t identify their political parties, except in the primaries. Does the writer want voters in each party’s primary to be members of other parties? Or does the writer want all voters to vote in all primaries? I thought each party’s primary was to decide which candidate the party puts up for election. Why should anyone who’s not a member of that party get to decide what the party does? Or is the writer complaining about having to identify their party on the mail in ballots? I remember having to identify your party to the poll workers years ago, so what’s different?

    Reply
    1. Dick Rylander

      From my perspective there should be NO way to determine party affiliation or vote from the outside of the envelope. This is NOT required by law. It’s an administrative choice. Thus, if people want protection, they need to reach out to the CC Election office and make their feelings noted.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *