Area resident Anna Miller addresses the latest absurdities surrounding the Clark County Council
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and may not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
A resolution on Immigration and Customs Enforcement, issued by the Clark County Council? Are we being punked?

One wonders how many more creative ways the Council can invent to spend time, staff resources, and taxpayer dollars on matters that fall entirely outside its authority, while simultaneously stoking public frustration and division.
Except for adopting the Sheriff’s budget, the County Council has no jurisdiction whatsoever over law enforcement operations. The Sheriff is an independently elected official, solely responsible for daytoday law enforcement decisions. This is not a gray area, nor is it controversial — it is basic county governance.
For anyone who may have lost the plot, here is the actual business of the people that should occupy the Council’s time:
• Land use and development policy, including the Comprehensive Plan
• Allocation of tax revenue and adoption of budgets for county offices
• Zoning and development codes
• Countywide land use policy changes (not individual projects or negotiations with developers)
• Creation and funding of the County Road Fund
• Adoption of longrange transportation plans
• Participation in assigned committees, advisory boards, and intergovernmental bodies
Notably absent from this list: symbolic resolutions about federal law enforcement agencies over which the Council has exactly zero authority.
It is refreshing, at least, when members of the Council like Councilor Belkot and in this matter Councilor Little, demonstrate a clear understanding of their role and the limits of their power. That level of clarity should not be exceptional — it should be the minimum requirement.
Perhaps it’s time for the Council, collectively, to stay in its lane and return to the unglamorous but essential work it was elected to do.
PS: Note to Chair Marshall: If a resolution’s legacy is that it was wiped with and thrown on the floor, as reported, one might reasonably question why it was introduced at all.
Anna Miller
Clark County resident and taxpayer
Also read:
- Letter: ‘Are we being punked?’Anna Miller questions the Clark County Council’s authority to pass a resolution on ICE and urges members to focus on core county responsibilities.
- Letter: ‘People who have entered illegally must face the consequences of their actions’Vancouver resident Debra Kalz argues the County Council should not pass immigration-related resolutions and says laws must be followed or changed through proper channels.
- Letter: ‘Our forefathers warned us to assemble when government rules over We The People’La Center resident Kimberlee Goheen Elbon criticizes the County Council’s handling of immigration-related meetings and urges residents to assemble and speak out.
- Legislation from Rep. David Stuebe to strengthen Medicaid support for emergency ambulance services receives full support from the HouseThe House unanimously passed HB 2531 from Rep. David Stuebe to update Medicaid reimbursement for emergency ambulance services and maintain federal compliance.
- Opinion: ‘County Council meetings have become an embarrassment to our community’Ken Vance criticizes recent Clark County Council meeting conduct and calls for increased security and stronger leadership from Chair Sue Marshall.







