Area resident Anna Miller addresses the latest absurdities surrounding the Clark County Council

Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and may not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com

A resolution on Immigration and Customs Enforcement, issued by the Clark County Council? Are we being punked? 

One wonders how many more creative ways the Council can invent to spend time, staff resources, and taxpayer dollars on matters that fall entirely outside its authority, while simultaneously stoking public frustration and division. 

Except for adopting the Sheriff’s budget, the County Council has no jurisdiction whatsoever over law enforcement operations. The Sheriff is an independently elected official, solely responsible for daytoday law enforcement decisions. This is not a gray area, nor is it controversial — it is basic county governance. 

For anyone who may have lost the plot, here is the actual business of the people that should occupy the Council’s time: 

• Land use and development policy, including the Comprehensive Plan 

• Allocation of tax revenue and adoption of budgets for county offices 

• Zoning and development codes 

• Countywide land use policy changes (not individual projects or negotiations with developers) 

• Creation and funding of the County Road Fund 

• Adoption of longrange transportation plans 

• Participation in assigned committees, advisory boards, and intergovernmental bodies 

Notably absent from this list: symbolic resolutions about federal law enforcement agencies over which the Council has exactly zero authority. 

It is refreshing, at least, when members of the Council like Councilor Belkot and in this matter Councilor Little, demonstrate a clear understanding of their role and the limits of their power. That level of clarity should not be exceptional — it should be the minimum requirement. 

Perhaps it’s time for the Council, collectively, to stay in its lane and return to the unglamorous but essential work it was elected to do. 

PS: Note to Chair Marshall: If a resolution’s legacy is that it was wiped with and thrown on the floor, as reported, one might reasonably question why it was introduced at all. 

Anna Miller 
Clark County resident and taxpayer

---

Also read:

• 
  Passage of income tax bill more likely as Gov. Ferguson now says he will sign it
  Gov. Bob Ferguson says he will sign a revised income tax proposal targeting earnings above $1 million if the Legislature approves the measure.
• 
  Opinion: Many important decisions looming as the 2026 session nears the end
  Rep. John Ley outlines budget concerns, energy policy debates and several tax proposals as the 2026 legislative session approaches its final days.
• 
  Opinion: Study shows 2025’s record tax increases reduce Washington’s GDP growth and worker pay
  Todd Myers writes that a new economic analysis projects Washington’s 2025 tax increases will slow GDP growth and reduce wages over the next several years.
• 
  WA Senate narrowly advances bill to reduce education spending by $176M through 2031
  The Washington Senate passed a bill by a 25-24 vote that would reduce and delay some education funding to help address the state’s budget shortfall.
• 
  Legislation from Rep. David Stuebe to strengthen Medicaid support for emergency ambulance services moves closer to becoming law
  A bill from Rep. David Stuebe updating Medicaid reimbursement for emergency ambulance services passed the Senate and now heads to the governor’s desk.