Battle Ground resident Gary Obermeyer says the GOP/Walsh proposal would not strengthen election integrity — it would burden existing, lawful voters
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and may not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
Paul Valencia’s Nov. 17 story opens with a misleading headline, referring to “the state’s voter ID initiative.” Initiative 26-126 is a partisan GOP campaign led by Rep. Jim Walsh, built on the unsupported claim that large numbers of non-citizens are voting and that “restoring trust” requires new barriers to voting.
The facts show otherwise. Washington already requires every voter-registration applicant to attest to U.S. citizenship under penalty of perjury. Violations are a Class C felony punishable by up to five years in prison and a $10,000 fine (RCW 29A.84.130). In addition, the state maintains a strong system for cross-checking and verifying voter data. There is no evidence of widespread non-citizen voting.
The GOP/Walsh proposal would not strengthen election integrity — it would burden existing, lawful voters. Under IL-26-126, anyone without an Enhanced ID would have to make an appointment with the county auditor, appear in person, and present documentary proof of citizenship just to keep their current registration. This requirement would fall hardest on elderly voters, low-income residents, rural communities, naturalized citizens, people who changed their names after marriage, Puerto Rico–born U.S. citizens, and anyone with older or technically non-compliant birth records.
Walsh has publicly acknowledged that this initiative is “the first step.” The end goal is to eliminate Washington’s vote-by-mail system and force a return to in-person voting lines — a dramatic rollback of a system that has served voters well for decades. Petitioners must gather just over 308,000 valid signatures by January 2, 2026, to place this on the 2026 ballot, and any qualification would almost certainly trigger legal challenges.
In the meantime, we should call this initiative what it is: a partisan effort to restrict access to the ballot. Despite claims to the contrary, Initiative 26-126 functions as voter suppression — plain and simple.
Gary Obermeyer
Battle Ground
Also read:
- POLL: Did the Clark County Council make the right decision by rejecting the auditor authority proposal?
The 3-2 council vote rejected giving the auditor’s office power to write financial impact statements for ballot measures. - Low sockeye salmon returns lead to fishery changes in the Columbia River
WDFW projects sockeye returns to Bonneville Dam at less than half the pre-season forecast of 275,000 fish. - WA employers added jobs in May, but unemployment rate stayed stuck at 5.2%
Washington added 10,600 jobs in May — its best month this year — yet unemployment held at 5.2%, up from 4.5% a year ago. - Opinion: Hospital price transparency is good, but its impact will be limited
Washington still shields hospitals from competition through certificate-of-need laws other states have repealed. - Evergreen Public Schools and Teachers Union agree to a five-year contract
Evergreen Public Schools reached a five-year deal with its teachers union, covering 22,000 students across 38 Vancouver schools. - Vancouver amends municipal code, banning pedestrians from staying on traffic islands, medians
Vancouver’s new ordinance targets people who remain on medians, not those crossing legally at crosswalks. - Tri-County SAR Teams conduct joint training exercise to enhance emergency response readiness
Six Southwest Washington SAR teams trained together in a simulated aircraft crash requiring day and nighttime rescue operations.
wpDiscuz
