Under California’s Advanced Clean Trucks program, the trucking industry must progressively transition to zero emissions for medium and heavy-duty trucks
TJ Martinell
The Center Square Washington
The state trucking industry is calling on the Legislature and Gov. Jay Inslee to detach Washington state from a California-based electric vehicle program due to a variety of practical and logistical factors that they argue threaten the supply chain system.
Under California’s Advanced Clean Trucks program, the trucking industry must progressively transition to zero emissions for medium and heavy-duty trucks. Starting next year, zero emission vehicles must make up 7% of all Class 2b-3 truck and Class 7-8 tractor sales, while Class 4-8 truck sales must be 11% zero emission vehicles.
By 2030, the sales percentages will need to be 30% for Class 2b-3 trucks and Class 7-8 tractors, and 50% for Class 4-8 trucks.
Washington Trucking Associations President Sheri Call wrote in an Aug. 15 letter to Inslee expressing concerns about “vehicle costs, operational challenges, and low to non-existent vehicle adoption. We feel these issues will place constraints on the industry and reduce supply chain resiliency in Washington state – one of the most trade-dependent states in the nation.”
Noting that the buying cycle for trucks can be as long as two years, “owners are placing orders for model year 2025 and beyond today” and “prompting WTA members to evaluate their options given cost and infrastructure constraints.”
Citing a “lack of infrastructure, vehicle cost, availability, and operational limitations,” Call wrote that “members are left with only a couple options” in order to comply that ultimately could lead to trucking companies shifting their operations to states that are not required to comply with the Advanced Clean Trucks, or ACT, mandate.
According to Call, zero emission trucks are two and half times more expensive than clean diesel fuel trucks, while they have two and half tons less cargo capacity and only offer 150-200 mile distance per charge.
She wrote that holding Washington truckers to the same standards as California isn’t appropriate because “state officials there have been building support for decarbonization for decades, including funding robust incentive programs for clean commercial trucks.”
“Washington does not have the regulatory infrastructure in place to discourage outside dispatch of trucks that do not comply with any reduced carbon or zero emission standard,” Call wrote further. “ACT will drive up costs on every consumer good or service that relies on M/HD commercial trucks.”
The Center Square reached out to Inslee’s office for comment. In an email, Deputy Communication Director Mike Faulk wrote that “we are preparing a response to address the concerns they have raised, and are confident that between the public and private sectors’ collective efforts to electrify the transportation sector, the Advanced Clean Truck requirements are achievable.”
He added that “there are a variety of compliance options, including giving credit from previous years sales to meet the first target in 2025 and credit-sharing across weight classes allowing for manufacturers to ramp up availability.”
Faulk added that Washington is collaborating with California and Oregon to secure federal funding for an EV truck charging corridor along Interstate 5. Semi-trucks typically rely on a DC-fast charger.
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- Opinion: Supreme Court’s ruling should end state’s bullying of the La Center School District
Ken Vance argues a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on parental rights in education could influence the ongoing dispute between the La Center School District and Washington state officials over gender pronoun policies. - State high school basketball: Five local teams to play in quarterfinal games Thursday, March 5
Five Clark County basketball teams advanced to state quarterfinal games after Columbia River, Columbia Adventist, Evergreen, and Seton Catholic won Wednesday and Union had already secured its spot. - Opinion: Neighbors for a Better Crossing urges Oregon Legislators to demand full audit of IBR project, echoing Washington’s HB 2669
Gary Clark of Neighbors for a Better Crossing urges Oregon lawmakers to pursue an audit of the Interstate Bridge Replacement project similar to Washington’s HB 2669 proposal. - Opinion: ‘Privacy’ is not a license for government secrecy – Supreme Court’s Mirabelli Ruling puts Washington’s school parental notification policies on notice
Vicki Murray argues a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on parental notification policies could affect Washington’s approach to student gender identity nondisclosure in schools. - WA Senate narrowly advances bill to reduce education spending by $176M through 2031
The Washington Senate passed a bill by a 25-24 vote that would reduce and delay some education funding to help address the state’s budget shortfall. - Opinion: Climate Commitment Act – Washington’s hidden carbon tax hits hard
Opinion, columns, Washington state, Climate Commitment Act, CCA Washington, Washington carbon tax debate, Washington gas prices, Nancy Churchill, Dangerous Rhetoric, Washington climate policy, Washington fuel costs, Travis Couture, Washington Department of Ecology, Washington Department of Commerce, Washington carbon credit auctions, Washington cap and trade program, Washington environmental policy - Legislation from Rep. David Stuebe to strengthen Medicaid support for emergency ambulance services moves closer to becoming law
A bill from Rep. David Stuebe updating Medicaid reimbursement for emergency ambulance services passed the Senate and now heads to the governor’s desk.
