
House Bill 1893 would remove the prohibition against receiving unemployment insurance benefits for workers taking part in a strike
Spencer Pauley
The Center Square Washington
The Washington House of Representatives has passed a bill that would allow workers in the state to receive unemployment insurance during strikes.
Currently, a worker is disqualified from receiving benefits if he or she is unemployed because of a labor action. House Bill 1893 would remove the prohibition against receiving unemployment insurance benefits for workers taking part in a strike.
The House approved a notable amendment to the bill to shift costs onto employers involved in labor disputes covered by HB 1893, instead of spreading the expense across the unemployment insurance system. This is a change from the underlying bill which would have had those benefits socialized across the unemployment insurance system.
Rep. Chris Corry, R-Yakima, noted that there is a 5.4% cap on the employment experience factor, so if there is a large strike with a lot of benefits paid out, the employer gets capped at the 5.4% mark.
“[This] inherently means that all the employers in the state are going to pick up the rest of the tab on the impact,” Corry said late Monday night during House floor debate.
According to the bill’s fiscal note, Washington could potentially see an increase this year in unemployment insurance claims from 812 to 3,000. That translates into an increase of $9.8 million to $14.1 million in annual payout of benefits that currently sit around $120 million a year.
The note also found that the state denied an average of 2,313 claims per year due to a labor dispute.
According to Cornell University’s Labor Action Tracker, thousands of workers went on strike in one of 26 labor actions in Washington in 2023.
During the floor debate, Rep. Suzanne Schmidt, R-Spokane Valley, argued that strikes are supposed to be what employees do as a last resort, because negotiations have stalled and this bill incentivizes employees to take advantage of the unemployment benefits.
“By paying employees unemployment during this time, it makes it an easier choice,” Schmidt said. “I fear that this is going to be something that becomes more usual and more often.”
Schmidt added that when workers go on strike, it slows down other industry sectors.
The House passed the bill by a 53-44 vote. The bill now goes to the Senate for consideration.
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- CCRW to host dinner event featuring Charter Review Commission membersThe Clark County Republican Women will host a Feb. 12 dinner event focused on the work of the County Charter Review Commission, featuring multiple commission members.
- Letter: ‘Hockinson is worth investing in, and this levy is part of that commitment’James Landon argues that supporting the Hockinson Schools levy is a necessary investment in the community, its schools, and the next generation.
- Letter: PDX activists flood Clark County Council over anti-ICE resolutionRob Anderson argues that organized Portland-based activist groups dominated public comment at a Clark County Council meeting to pressure councilors over an anti-ICE resolution.
- Opinion: Moving the ball down the fieldNancy Churchill argues that while HB 2221 will not advance this session, the public hearing marked meaningful progress by opening dialogue, building relationships, and advancing science-based wildlife management discussions in Olympia.
- Vancouver Fire responds to fatal structure fireVancouver Fire crews responded to a structure fire on East 6th Street where one person and one dog were found deceased and the cause remains under investigation.
- A sub-district vote could be a way to go to pay O&M costs associated with light railClark County Council members heard details on how a voter-approved C-TRAN sub-district could be created to fund long-term operations and maintenance costs for light rail tied to a new Interstate Bridge.
- Speculation on Seahawks’ sale heats up following proposed WA ‘jock tax’Speculation about a potential Seahawks sale has intensified amid debate over a proposed Washington income tax that would apply to high-earning athletes and performers.









Ridiculous. Forcing others to pay people who refuse to go to work is simply wrong.
We truly live in a socialist state. Take money from those who are working to pay those who are refusing to work.