
Washington State Republican Party provides a response to US Supreme Court ruling in favor of presidential immunity
Monday’s 6-3 SCOTUS decision in the Trump v. United States case is a win for the rule of law according to the Washington State Republican Party (WAGOP) and for Donald Trump. A WAGOP statement indicates it’s a serious blow to left-wing attempts to weaponize the court system. So, it’s a win for all Americans.

But WAGOP officials believe the hysterical overreaction to the decision among left-wing partisans is a potential risk to civil order.
Technically, the decision resolves recent questions about how “presidential immunity” works in our law. The Supreme Court states that legal immunity does exist for “official” actions of a president. But not for “unofficial” actions. A president’s actions are presumed to have immunity from lawsuits, but that presumption can be overcome — and a lawsuit against a president can go forward — if an action is shown to be “unofficial.”
This distinction helps Trump as several of the most controversial allegations made against him involve actions he took in his official capacity.
There are other aspects of today’s decision that are worth noting. In his concurring opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas points out that an entity prosecuting a president must have proper Constitutional authority from the people to do so. This will likely limit the ability of “special prosecutors” and other mechanisms not clearly described in our Constitution.
Some critics of today’s decision will complain that the Supreme Court has “punted” in this decision, by leaving the distinction between “official” and “unofficial” actions to other courts. This criticism is rational and worth considering. But setting that determination as a preliminary step in any action against a president is consistent with Constitutional separation of powers and limits on government overreach.
Other criticisms of the decision are, frankly, less rational. Some partisans who revile Trump have been quick to jump to hysterical conclusions. A Joe Biden campaign staffer shrieked to the media that the Supreme Court “has just handed Donald Trump the keys to dictatorship.”
Of course, that is not true.
Other hysterics associated with the Biden campaign attacked the Supreme Court as “conflicted and compromised.” This overheated rhetoric is dangerous and a potential threat to civil order. Normal people should remain vigilant—such hyperbolic responses could encourage violent behavior among unstable political extremists.
Still, today, the rule of law won.
In the meantime, Trump’s presidential reelection campaign continues to gain political momentum. Trump campaign staffer Jason Miller (a Washington native) recently told a Seattle-based media outlet that “Washington state may now be in play” for Trump in 2024. Today’s Supreme Court decision adds to that momentum.
Also read:
- County’s Commission on Aging continues discussion on mobility at April meetingFour-part mobility series brings aging experts together for public discussion on transportation solutions.
- Identity Clark County appoints Katie Henry to boardHenry brings experience from Austin Regional Clinic where she oversaw 13 capital projects and 50% patient growth.
- Letter: It’s time to protect student choice in Washington classroomsVancouver resident calls for laws protecting students who opt out of animal dissection in science classes.
- Late-night house fire prompts pet rescue effortFirefighters rescued four pets from burning Vancouver home but three animals died despite lifesaving efforts.
- Opinion: Washington’s broken trustDave Upthegrove’s 80,000-acre forest ban is forcing rural school districts into state financial control and massive teacher layoffs.
- Opinion: Cue the revenuersState hiring 300 tax collectors this summer even though income tax revenue won’t arrive until 2029.
- Opinion: Everything about TriMet screams ‘poor management’Rep. John Ley examines TriMet’s $850 million operating loss and 75% cost increase for MAX light rail service.








