
Washington State Republican Party provides a response to US Supreme Court ruling in favor of presidential immunity
Monday’s 6-3 SCOTUS decision in the Trump v. United States case is a win for the rule of law according to the Washington State Republican Party (WAGOP) and for Donald Trump. A WAGOP statement indicates it’s a serious blow to left-wing attempts to weaponize the court system. So, it’s a win for all Americans.

But WAGOP officials believe the hysterical overreaction to the decision among left-wing partisans is a potential risk to civil order.
Technically, the decision resolves recent questions about how “presidential immunity” works in our law. The Supreme Court states that legal immunity does exist for “official” actions of a president. But not for “unofficial” actions. A president’s actions are presumed to have immunity from lawsuits, but that presumption can be overcome — and a lawsuit against a president can go forward — if an action is shown to be “unofficial.”
This distinction helps Trump as several of the most controversial allegations made against him involve actions he took in his official capacity.
There are other aspects of today’s decision that are worth noting. In his concurring opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas points out that an entity prosecuting a president must have proper Constitutional authority from the people to do so. This will likely limit the ability of “special prosecutors” and other mechanisms not clearly described in our Constitution.
Some critics of today’s decision will complain that the Supreme Court has “punted” in this decision, by leaving the distinction between “official” and “unofficial” actions to other courts. This criticism is rational and worth considering. But setting that determination as a preliminary step in any action against a president is consistent with Constitutional separation of powers and limits on government overreach.
Other criticisms of the decision are, frankly, less rational. Some partisans who revile Trump have been quick to jump to hysterical conclusions. A Joe Biden campaign staffer shrieked to the media that the Supreme Court “has just handed Donald Trump the keys to dictatorship.”
Of course, that is not true.
Other hysterics associated with the Biden campaign attacked the Supreme Court as “conflicted and compromised.” This overheated rhetoric is dangerous and a potential threat to civil order. Normal people should remain vigilant—such hyperbolic responses could encourage violent behavior among unstable political extremists.
Still, today, the rule of law won.
In the meantime, Trump’s presidential reelection campaign continues to gain political momentum. Trump campaign staffer Jason Miller (a Washington native) recently told a Seattle-based media outlet that “Washington state may now be in play” for Trump in 2024. Today’s Supreme Court decision adds to that momentum.
Also read:
- Vancouver Police investigate fatality collisionVancouver Police are investigating a vehicle versus pedestrian collision on NE 162nd Avenue near NE Poplar Street that resulted in a fatality.
- Washington governor talks potential return of SuperSonics with NBA commissionerGov. Bob Ferguson spoke with NBA Commissioner Adam Silver about the possibility of bringing the Seattle SuperSonics back as the league weighs future expansion decisions.
- Opinion: The income tax proposal has arrivedRyan Frost of the Washington Policy Center argues that a proposed Washington income tax creates a new revenue stream rather than delivering tax reform or relief.
- Is it time to lower the legal limit for blood alcohol content to 0.05 in the state of Washington?Mothers Against Drunk Driving and families affected by impaired driving are urging Washington lawmakers to lower the legal BAC limit to 0.05, citing prevention data and personal testimony from Clark County residents.
- Expert in homebuilding has several tips on how to make housing affordableVeteran homebuilder Tracy Doriot shares his perspective on why regulations, taxes, labor shortages, and permitting delays are driving housing costs higher in Clark County and across Washington.
- Opinion: ‘If they want light rail, they should be the ones who pay for it’Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance argues that supporters of light rail tied to the I-5 Bridge replacement should bear the local cost of operating and maintaining the system through a narrowly drawn sub-district.
- POLL: If a sub-district is created, what area should it include?Clark County residents are asked where a potential C-TRAN sub-district should be drawn if voters are asked to fund light rail operations and maintenance costs.









Doesn’t matter it you’re left or right…..this makes a King for a president….. we should all be worried….