
The upcoming 60-day legislative session convenes on Jan. 8
Spencer Pauley
The Center Square Washington
The Washington Association of Sheriffs & Police Chiefs is urging state lawmakers to consider bills in the upcoming legislative session that improve the following: recruitment and retention, juvenile justice, and vehicle pursuits.
Recruitment and retention
“Understaffed and under-resourced law enforcement agencies affect crime prevention, response time to 911 calls, and increases stress on our remaining police officers,” WASPC said in a pre-session statement. “Every community deserves a public safety agency that is well-trained, well-equipped, and well-staffed to deliver the best public service.”
For more than 12 years, Washington has had the fewest law enforcement officers per capita among all 50 states and the District of Columbia, according to WASPC.
“We need to act quickly to begin to catch up with the growth of our region.”
Juvenile justice
Current laws require an attorney’s permission before police can speak to a juvenile suspect.
Attorneys generally are against allowing police to talk with juveniles about an investigation, WASPC notes, and that “takes away opportunities for youth to declare their innocence [and] offer helpful information about other suspects or evidence related to an investigation.”
WASPC seeks legislation that allows what it deems to be a positive intervention between troubled youth and law enforcement, anticipating reduced crime as a result.
Vehicle pursuits
While the state Legislature made a few adjustments to police vehicle pursuit laws this year, WASPC contends there has been a minimal reduction in such pursuits.
Engrossed Senate Bill 5352, passed by the Legislature this year and signed into law by Gov. Jay Inslee, lowered the threshold for police pursuits from “probable cause” to “reasonable suspicion” in cases involving the most serious crimes.
ESB 5352 was a response House Bill 1054, passed by the Legislature and signed into law by Inslee in 2021, limited police to engaging in a pursuit if there is “probable cause” to arrest a person in the vehicle for committing a specific violent crime or sex offense such as murder, kidnapping, drive-by shooting or rape.
In addition to legislation allowing law enforcement more latitude in pursuing suspects, the association seeks legislation that lets police utilize resources such as traffic cameras.
“We can’t allow offenders the advantage over victims and to just drive away,” WASPC said.
The upcoming 60-day legislative session convenes on Jan. 8.
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- Fort Vancouver athletics improving under partnership with Trico LeagueFort Vancouver High School athletics are showing measurable gains in competition and participation during the second year of a partnership competing in the Class 1A Trico League.
- Opinion: Inviting courts into health care policy discussionElizabeth New (Hovde) warns that Senate Joint Resolution 8206 could invite lawsuits by placing vague health care mandates into Washington’s Constitution.
- Opinion: 24 States In. Washington Out? $732 Million Lost?Vicki Murray argues Washington risks forfeiting $732 million in federal education funding if state leaders do not opt into the federal tax-credit scholarship program.
- C-TRAN offering free service on Transit Equity Day, Feb. 4C-TRAN will offer free service across its entire system on February 4 in observance of Transit Equity Day, honoring the legacy of Rosa Parks.
- City of Battle Ground prepares for 75th Anniversary CelebrationThe City of Battle Ground is marking the 75th anniversary of its incorporation with a year-long series of community activities and celebrations planned throughout 2026.
- Opinion: Nationwide strike in support of illegals and opposing the rule of law?Lars Larson argues that a reported nationwide strike reflects opposition to immigration enforcement and the rule of law, criticizing political leaders and media coverage.
- POLL: Should councilors serving on boards be required to vote the way the full council decides?A new poll asks whether Clark County councilors serving on boards should be required to vote in line with the full council’s position or retain independent judgment.








