
The nation’s highest court vacated the decision against Aaron and Melissa Klein in their ongoing litigation with the Oregon Bureau of Labor & Industries
Logan Washburn
The Center Square
For the second time, the U.S. Supreme Court has vacated a lower court decision against a Christian couple in Oregon who were punished for not making a cake for a same-sex wedding.
In an orders list release Friday, the nation’s highest court vacated the decision against Aaron and Melissa Klein in their ongoing litigation with the Oregon Bureau of Labor & Industries.
The court sent the case back to the Court of Appeals of Oregon for reconsideration in light of its same-day ruling in 303 Createive LLC v. Elenis. In that case, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that Colorado cannot force Lorie Smith, a Christian graphic artist, to design websites that celebrate same-sex marriage, which she was opposed to doing on religious grounds, despite the state’s protective anti-discrimination law.
“It’s a win when the Supreme Court vacates a bad lower court decision like it did for Aaron and Melissa today, but the case is not over,” said Kelly Shackelford, president of the First Liberty Institute, which is representing the Kleins, in a news release.
The Kleins, owners of Gresham, Oregon-based bakery Sweet Cakes by Melissa, declined to create a wedding cake in 2013 celebrating same-sex marriage, resulting in a gag order and $135,000 fine by the Oregeon Bureau of Labor & Industries, forcing the Christian couple to close their bakery.
In 2016, they appealed the ruling with the Oregon Court of Appeals, with that court upholding the order in 2018. This prompted the Kleins first appeal to the Supreme Court that same year.
In January 2019, the Supreme Court vacated the 2018 ruling against the Kleins and sent the case back down to the state appeals court due to the then-newly issued Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission decision.
In that case, the Supreme Court ruled 7-2 that the Colorado Civil Rights Commission demonstrated an unconstitutional anti-religious animus toward Jack Phillips of Masterpiece Cakeshop when it punished him for refusing to make a cake for a same-sex wedding.
In January 2022, a three-judge panel of the Court of Appeals of Oregon maintained that the Kleins unlawfully discriminated against the lesbian couple involved in their refusal to make a same-sex wedding cake back in 2013.
However, that court panel also decided to reverse the order requiring the couple to pay $135,000 in damages and remanded the case for further proceedings.
Last September, First Liberty filed an appeal with the Supreme Court, asking the justices to review another decision against the Kleins by the Oregon Court of Appeals.
“The Kleins have been fighting for the First Amendment for over a decade and we will stand with them no matter how long it takes,” Shackelford said.
This report was first published by The Center Square.
Also read:
- Letter: Interstate Bridge Replacement $13.6 billion estimate is too low! Bob Ortblad argues the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s $13.6 billion cost estimate understates the true expense, citing comparable projects, construction challenges, and engineering assumptions.
- Opinion: ‘The drama and the waste of taxpayer money continues’Rep. John Ley outlines his objections to the approved fixed-span I-5 Bridge design, citing cost concerns, engineering standards, funding uncertainty, and opposition to light rail and tolls.
- Coast Guard approves fixed-span design for new Interstate BridgeThe U.S. Coast Guard has approved a fixed-span design for the new Interstate Bridge, clearing a major hurdle for the Interstate Bridge Replacement project.
- Business Profile: Handel’s Ice Cream opens its first shop in Washington, in VancouverHandel’s Ice Cream has opened its first Washington location in east Vancouver, with a grand opening planned for Jan. 17.
- Opinion: Why vote no on the Battle Ground School District levy?Dick Rylander outlines why he believes voters should reject the Battle Ground School District levy, citing costs, enrollment trends, test results, and district spending priorities.
- Letter: The multi-million dollar cash grab in Washington schoolsYacolt resident Mark Rose argues that rising superintendent salaries conflict with classroom cuts and repeated levy requests in Clark County school districts.
- Discover your future at WSU Vancouver’s Preview Day, Jan. 24WSU Vancouver will host a free Preview Day on Jan. 24, offering prospective students and families an inside look at campus life and academic opportunities.









If the United State Government can force anyone to “create” an object where in the name of heavens is that going to stop. If I am a dress designer, can they force me to imagine, conceive of and then implement a completely new design and force me to make a pattern, cut it out and sew it? Can an oil on canvas artist be forced to paint a painting “on demand” regardless of its completed image? Can any person, company, manufacturer, artist of any style be forced to “create” a product, image, or thing on demand? You see what this is? The two lesbians walked in and said “create” this item, even if it is against you will and your deeply held religious beliefs. If you do not, we will bankrupt you. Which one of us is next. The Supreme Court should STOMP it our now and stop bouncing it around.