They love the cover-up: Biden’s HHS wants mask mandates back

Those COVID masks may be coming back. Even mask mandates soon could be appearing. That's according to a new report from Joe Biden's Department of Health and Human Services.

Says face coverings needed to help those with ‘long COVID’

Bob Unruh
WND News Center

Those COVID masks may be coming back. Even mask mandates soon could be appearing.

That’s according to a new report from Joe Biden’s Department of Health and Human Services.

It’s all because of “long COVID,” which the Centers for Disease Control says includes “long-term effects” from the COVID-19 infection, which apparently came out of a Chinese lab that works to make viruses more dangerous and spread around the globe in 2020, killing millions.

“People call post-COVID conditions by many names, including: long COVID, long-haul COVID, post-acute COVID-19, post-acute sequelae of SARS CoV-2 infection (PASC), long-term effects of COVID, and chronic COVID,” the CDC explains.

Those conditions can last weeks, months, or longer and even can be considered a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Fox News reports the HHS report suggests masking and social distancing should be encouraged or even mandated once more in public.

Fox reported, “The report, commissioned by HHS and produced by research agency Coforma, calls for a broad range of government policies to help people who continue to deal with the lingering effects of COVID. Those policies include an awareness campaign, funding for long COVID support groups, financial support for students and workers, and new health benefits for COVID victims.”

Further, Fox confirmed, “Reinstating a mask mandate may be the most controversial recommendation in the report, which says ending that mandate in late 2021 and 2022 is making it harder for people with long COVID.”

The report charged that, “The lifting of mask mandates and indifferent attitude toward masking and social distancing typical in many public and private places further isolates people with Long COVID.”

So, it said, those making policy should “encourage or mandate policies and protocols regarding masking and social distancing in public spaces.”

The advice conflicts with Biden’s statement of act in September that the “pandemic is over.”

But despite that statement, his administration continues to ask for more and more money – as well as demanding policies – that were used to fight COVID.

Just last week, Biden’s White House demanded another $10 billion to spend on COVID projects.

The report also cited several areas where Biden likely will want to use much more tax money: “expanded mental and behavioral health care for people with long COVID,” “revised federal and state policies to make sure companies and schools provide needed support for those with long COVID,” and “vaccine promotion.”

That’s even though vaccines now are known to trigger side effects up to and including death.


Also read:

9 Comments

  1. Melissa

    Some of those Biden-covid-spending tax dollars ought to be spent looking at the connection between long covid and vaccination, a.k.a. Spike Protein Syndrome. Figuring out why a subset of people are not able to efficiently clear spike protein, both virus- and vaccine-induced. This won’t be popular with Big Pharma, but science is about asking hard questions. Not dogmatically sweeping them under the rug.

    Reply
  2. David Roberts

    This idea is DOA. Too many people will just say no. I know for sure that Dave Roberts will boycott any entity that requires a mask for entrance or service. He only puts up with the Medical Industry mandates.

    Reply
  3. Sylvia

    Taxpayer $$ have been used to improve ‘healthcare’ for far too long, with zero lasting positive outcomes.
    The Covid gene vaccines have proven to be far from “safe and effective”. In fact the risks, whether actual or potential, far outweigh any (yet to be proven) benefits. Many have asked whether ‘long Covid’ is an adverse effect given a new label. Mandating endless boosters is likely to prolong illness by deliberate tampering of the immune system.
    Stubbornly using the same tools to solve the same problems will never succeed. Such a waste and misuse of hard earned revenue.
    Taxpayer $$ must be redirected towards helping the public to develop lasting wellness by making lifestyle changes. Top of the list:

    1. Consumption of clean healthy foods and drinks. Do not eat to excess. We are what we eat, consumed – eg grassfed meat is superior to grain fed, certified organic is better than glyphosate sprayed or genetically modified.
    2. Eliminate, or at least reduce, any and all addictions.
    3. Exercise, as able, regularly. No need to be an elite athlete.
    4. Quality sleep, not quantity.
    5. Practise daily gratitude for the good things in life – do not dwell or ruminate on the less good or the past. It leads to anger and/or depression.
    6. Practise slow deep breathing

    Remember that the journey of a thousand miles begins with one step.

    Simple as these steps may seem, the benefits are well worth the effort. They will correct metabolic syndrome issues, eg obesity, T2diabetes, visceral fat, lethargy, aches & pains, as well as age related cognitive decline eg brain fog.
    Genuinely addressing public wellness must begin by encouraging and helping the population lead a truly healthier lifestyle, both physically and mentally.
    To date, money has been wasted on maintaining disease under the guise of ‘healthcare’. Too many Americans are becoming fatter and sicker and addicted to pharma drugs. Chronic diseases are normalized as the order of the day.
    Why is that?
    Is that ‘healthcare’????

    Reply
  4. Ron

    News With Integrity? Posts a story from World Nut Daily, which references a story from FOX news and not one link, that I could find on any source, to the actual article/study by HHS. Of course, I can’t find a lot of things these days, so if anyone else that’s read this knows the link to the HHS study, feel free to post it.

    Reply
  5. Sylvia

    HHS has released documents on the so called ‘Long Covid’. What is glaringly missing is factual scientific data on what long Covid is and what the root causes are. Below is a recent one released a few days ago:

    ” Releases Long COVID Report Providing Insights and Opportunities to Support Patient Community”

    https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2022/11/21/hhs-releases-long-covid-report-providing-insights-and-opportunities-support.html

    Until the ‘What, How, Why’ are correctly identified, any attempts to address the issue will remain an exercise in futility like so many in past decades. Recall ‘The War on Cancer’? That is but one example. Does it really have to be a war? Wars are deadly on all sides – there are no winners, only losers.
    There are other, less invasive, ways.

    Learning to implement nature’s tools of resilience is a means to ensure that biological time is not a guaranteed downward spiral and chronic illness is no longer an inevitability. The human body is designed by nature to heal and regenerate IF it is treated with respect.

    Nature’s tools of resilience help activate epigenetics to turn off less desirable genetic traits and turn on the best ones.
    Genes do not determine destiny – epigenetics does.

    Reply
    1. Wolfie

      Its comments like the one above yours that answers the question how much more do people need? You have a community of people who will absolutely refuse to use any critical thinking and demand posts, links, source and even when provided.. state its not enough. At this point, any critically thinking person should have stepped back and said…wait a second. None of this makes any logical sense. Because it doesn’t.

      Reply
      1. Sylvia

        Well stated and rational as always. I so appreciate you.
        Critical thinking is a skill that anyone can develop. Lack of it could be caused by either deliberately being willfully blind, or a cognitive impairment. Both are easily corrected if a person accepts the condition as a serious impediment. The “what, how, why” are simple questions that must be asked before coming to a conclusion.

        Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *