Workers’ compensation premiums going up 4.9% for each full-time employee
Brett Davis
The Center Square Washington
An average annual increase of $65 in workers’ compensation premiums will be shared by employers and employees starting Jan. 1.
Earlier this year, Washington’s Department of Labor & Industries announced the 4.9% compensation premium rate increase for each full-time employee. Workers will pay about a quarter of the premium.
Opinions on impact to consumers differs between individuals at the state and national level of the National Federation of Independent Business. Patrick Connor, director of the NFIB in Washington, believes consumers will feel the domino effect; Anthony Malandra, a senior media manager for NFIB nationally, cited a 20-year-old survey saying businesses will absorb the hit.
The Labor Department touts the rate hike as a way “to help cover the cost of providing wage and disability benefits for injured works, as well as medical treatment of workplace injuries and illnesses.”
The National Federation of Independent Business worries that increased workers’ compensation costs would be another burden born by the state’s small business owners. Malandra, in an email to The Center Square, says “the increase in workers’ compensation premium rates is another example of the inflationary times we’re living in.”
Referencing NFIB’s November Small Business Economic Trends report, Malandra said 22% of owners indicated “that inflation was their single most important problem operating their business.”
Malandra went on to point out that of the 75 issues measured in NFIB’s 2020 Small Business Problems and Priorities report, workers’ compensation ranked No. 22.
Connor said using the Labor Department’s estimates, the state-run workers’ compensation system already averages annual cost of $1,300 per employee.
“This 5% rate hike,” he wrote in an email to The Center Square, “means a small business with 10 employees will be hit with a $650 bigger bill in 2024. It also takes more money out of workers’ pockets, since part of these costs can be deducted from their paychecks.”
The timing of the rate increase is not good for small businesses, according to Connor.
“This latest workers’ comp tax hike comes as employers are also paying higher wages to attract and retain workers, adjusting to mandatory minimum wage and overtime-exempt salary increases, and scrambling to cover other government-mandated benefit obligations, let alone increased costs for goods, equipment, and services due to inflation,” he said.
Customers could be impacted as well, Connor stated.
“Some businesses will be forced to increase prices just to stay afloat as the flood of government-mandated costs continues to rise,” he said.
Malandra had a slightly different take on businesses passing along higher costs to customers.
“Interestingly, small business owners don’t necessarily pass cost increases onto their customers,” he said, referencing an NFIB survey from more than 20 years ago.
Per the 2001 survey, “Small-business owners respond to cost increases with a variety of specific actions. The most frequently taken actions include absorbing the increased cost in the form of lower earnings or profits, higher selling prices, and reductions in the use of the good/service whose cost rose, e.g., energy conservation when energy costs rise. Employee-related measures, e.g., layoffs, or altered investment patterns are not taken often unless they are the good/service whose cost increases.”
Connor decried Washington’s requirement that all employers – except those authorized to self-insure – must purchase workers’ compensation insurance from a state fund.
“The best way to address the problems this rate hike will cause is for Washington state to allow competition in the workers’ compensation insurance market just as 46 other states have done for decades,” he said.
That’s a reference to the fact that in 46 states and the District of Columbia, employers are generally expected to purchase workers’ compensation insurance from private insurance companies, which are free to offer the coverage or not as they see fit.
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- Vancouver Police release critical incident video from Dec. 28 officer-involved shooting
Vancouver Police Department released a Critical Incident Video related to a December 28 officer-involved shooting while the Office of Independent Investigations continues its review. - Opinion: Transit agencies need accountability not increased state subsidy
Charles Prestrud argues that Washington transit agencies face rising costs and declining ridership due to governance structures that lack public accountability. - Letter: ‘For years, American foreign policy too often felt like a blank check’
Vancouver resident Peter Bracchi argues that the 2025 National Security Strategy marks a long-overdue shift toward clearer priorities, shared responsibility, and interest-based American leadership. - POLL: Are you better off than you were a year ago?
This week’s poll asks readers to reflect on their personal financial situation and whether they feel better off than they were a year ago as economic conditions continue to shift. - Opinion: Does tailgating cause speeding?
Target Zero Manager Doug Dahl examines whether tailgating contributes to speeding and explains why following too closely increases crash risk with little benefit. - Opinion: ‘The Democrats’ part of the bargain’
Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance reflects on a New Year’s Eve encounter and a Bill Maher commentary to assess what he sees as cultural and political changes from the past year. - Free fares on New Year’s Eve is a big hit with C-TRAN riders
C-TRAN’s New Year’s Eve free-fare program provided extended late-night service and a safe transportation option for riders across Clark County just after midnight.
wpDiscuz
