‘Big Media and Big Tech stole the 2020 election, throwing it to Joe Biden’
Bob Unruh
WND News Center
By now it’s common knowledge that the FBI during the 2020 election lobbied social media to suppress accurate information about the Biden family’s international business arrangements, falsely labeling it “disinformation.”
A poll showed Americans believe that likely turned the election away from President Trump and to Joe Biden.
Now a report from Newsbusters, a branch of the Media Research Center, reports that a similar scheme is being assembled for the 2022 vote … with $30 million from leftist billionaire George Soros.
The report explains that a number of organization’s supported financially – in a big way – by Soros are working to have the chiefs of Big Tech corporations “step up their censorship…”
“The Soros-funded Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights (LCCHR) spearheaded an Oct. 13 open letter signed by 11 other liberal groups pining for Big Tech to ‘[t]ake immediate steps to curb the spread of voting disinformation in the midterms and future elections and to help prevent the undermining of our democracy,'” the report explained.
The letter complained about how “online disinformation,” is hitting voters with its efforts “to confuse, intimidate, and harass” them.
The letters were sent to Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg and Google’s Sundar Pichai, Twitter’s Parag Agrawal and others from YouTube, TikTok, Snap and Instagram.
It was Zuckerberg who has admitted that he was lobbied by the FBI in 2020 to suppress accurate but damaging information about the Biden family, under the claim it was “disinformation.”
He did suppress that information and many Americans now believe that turned the election from President Trump to Joe Biden.
Brent Bozell, the chief of the MRC, pointed out, “Soros spent $30M on groups trying to get Big Tech to censor conservatives ahead of the midterms.”
The letter even demands action against individual candidates, charging, “[T]here is very little in your 2022 policies that reflects the ongoing and new challenges facing us as the midterms approach. Many of the bad actors and election deniers have continued and stepped up their online spread of false information since 2020, and some are even on the ballots for elected office in 2022. The policies and actions by platforms must do more to specifically combat these trends in 2022 and beyond.”
Signatories to the letter included the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, Center for American Progress, Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and others.
The letter insisted that the companies “continually and consistently” enforce their censorship programs.
The Newsbusters report explained, “Censorship before a U.S. election is not a new phenomenon. Big Media and Big Tech stole the 2020 election, throwing it to President Joe Biden. A 2020 MRC poll found that 45 percent of Biden voters weren’t fully aware of the New York Post story exposing alleged corrupt dealings involving him and his son Hunter precisely because Big Media and Big Tech whitewashed it in the name of blocking so-called ‘disinformation.'”
The report continued, “Had Americans been fully aware of the scandal, the poll found, 9.4 percent of Biden voters would not have voted for him. This shift would have flipped all six of the swing states Biden won to former President Donald Trump, giving Trump a victorious 311 electoral votes and sealing a second presidential term.”
Also read:
- POLL: Should councilors serving on boards be required to vote the way the full council decides?
A new poll asks whether Clark County councilors serving on boards should be required to vote in line with the full council’s position or retain independent judgment. - Ninth Circuit revives claims against prosecutor who personally swore to warrant affidavit containing alleged false statements
The Ninth Circuit ruled that prosecutorial immunity does not apply when a prosecutor personally swears to alleged false statements used to obtain an arrest warrant. - VIDEO: Washington lawmakers clash over bills directed at limiting ICE officers
A heated House committee hearing on legislation aimed at limiting ICE officers in Washington was temporarily recessed after sharp exchanges between lawmakers over testimony and procedural disputes. - Stung by a court ruling, WA looks to clarify what is an ‘election’
Washington lawmakers are moving to clarify the legal definition of an election after a court overturned a felony conviction for voting in both Washington and Oregon on the same day. - Opinion: Olympia wants a 4-day work week. It won’t work out as the politicians think it will
Mark Harmsworth argues that House Bill 2611’s proposed 32-hour workweek would raise costs, strain small businesses, and undermine Washington’s economic competitiveness. - Republicans celebrate school choice in US Senate hearing, while Dems question fairness
Republicans and Democrats clashed during a U.S. Senate hearing over school choice, with supporters praising expanded options for families and critics warning the policies could deepen inequities in public education. - Opinion: The many reminders not to speed
Doug Dahl examines the many technological and policy-based reminders aimed at reducing speeding and explains why most drivers still choose not to use them voluntarily.
