Enacted in 2021, the tax is on the income derived from the sale of capital gains, which the State Supreme Court ruled earlier this year is an excise tax
TJ Martinell
The Center Square Washington
The U.S. Supreme Court could decide as early as Dec. 11 whether it will take up a Washington lawsuit challenging the legality of the state’s capital gains tax, according to the Mountain States Policy Center.
Enacted in 2021, the tax is on the income derived from the sale of capital gains, which the State Supreme Court ruled earlier this year is an excise tax.
If overturned, the ruling could leave the state in a position of having to reimburse affected taxpayers to the tune of almost $900 million. Plaintiffs in the lawsuit initially requested that the State Supreme Court prevent the Department of Revenue from collecting the tax until the case was decided, but the state high court ruled that it could.
The lawsuit argues the 2021 law violates both the U.S. and the State constitutions, claiming it violates the federal Interstate Commerce Clause by attempting to tax activities in other states.
It also asserts that the tax, labeled by proponents as an excise tax, is actually a graduated income tax that runs afoul of the State Constitution’s uniformity clause regarding property taxes of the same class; the State Constitution defines property as “all things tangible and intangible subject to ownership,” and the State Supreme Court has consistently ruled since 1933 that income falls under that definition.
Unlike excise taxes, Washington’s capital gains tax is not owed following the sale if no income is generated from it.
The State Supreme Court decision earlier this year did not address the question of whether income is considered property.
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- Opinion: Neighbors for a Better Crossing urges Oregon Legislators to demand full audit of IBR project, echoing Washington’s HB 2669
Gary Clark of Neighbors for a Better Crossing urges Oregon lawmakers to pursue an audit of the Interstate Bridge Replacement project similar to Washington’s HB 2669 proposal. - Opinion: ‘Privacy’ is not a license for government secrecy – Supreme Court’s Mirabelli Ruling puts Washington’s school parental notification policies on notice
Vicki Murray argues a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on parental notification policies could affect Washington’s approach to student gender identity nondisclosure in schools. - WA Senate narrowly advances bill to reduce education spending by $176M through 2031
The Washington Senate passed a bill by a 25-24 vote that would reduce and delay some education funding to help address the state’s budget shortfall. - Opinion: Climate Commitment Act – Washington’s hidden carbon tax hits hard
Opinion, columns, Washington state, Climate Commitment Act, CCA Washington, Washington carbon tax debate, Washington gas prices, Nancy Churchill, Dangerous Rhetoric, Washington climate policy, Washington fuel costs, Travis Couture, Washington Department of Ecology, Washington Department of Commerce, Washington carbon credit auctions, Washington cap and trade program, Washington environmental policy - Legislation from Rep. David Stuebe to strengthen Medicaid support for emergency ambulance services moves closer to becoming law
A bill from Rep. David Stuebe updating Medicaid reimbursement for emergency ambulance services passed the Senate and now heads to the governor’s desk. - Coffee Caturday is this Saturday in Battle Ground sounds purrrrrfect
Coffee Caturday on March 7 will bring pet-themed vendors, coffee, and donation opportunities to the Battle Ground Senior Center. - WA governor: Passage of income tax could slip to 2027
Gov. Bob Ferguson warned Washington lawmakers may need until 2027 to finalize a proposed tax on income above $1 million as negotiations continue over how to use the revenue.
