The legislation would make occupational licensing easier for individuals to pursue their desired careers and get licensed in Washington if required
Rep. Stephanie McClintock has introduced her first pieces of legislation with bipartisan support designed to increase job growth in Washington state.
McClintock, who was sworn in as a member of the Washington State House of Representatives on Jan. 9, is sponsoring House Bills 1301 and 1360.
The legislation would make occupational licensing easier for individuals to pursue their desired careers and get licensed in Washington if required.
“These bills would allow people to seek their desired careers and more forward in whatever path they choose.” said McClintock, R-Vancouver. “We must do what we can to remove the many obstacles associated with occupational licensing.”
House Bill 1360, which already has the support of the top Democrat in the House Consumer Protection and Business Committee, would allow the Department of Licensing (DOL) to consider competency-based standards for professional licenses.
That means the DOL could issue a professional license to an applicant who meets all competency-based licensing requirements for that specific professional license without regard to other requirements.
House Bill 1301, which is also expected to receive plenty of support from both sides, would direct the DOL to review and analyze 20% of professional licenses each year. It would also require the DOL to submit an annual report to the Legislature with recommendations on whether the reviewed professional licenses should be terminated, continued, or modified.
McClintock, who is the assistant ranking member on the House Consumer Protection and Business Committee, says the bills would spur job growth in the state.
“Washington already has more than enough regulatory agencies,” said McClintock. “The never-ending red tape slows job growth and prevents individuals from progressing. It’s time to change that.”
“People are forced to work through too many obstacles trying to get licensed in Washington. State agencies must reevaluate their priorities to help people who want to work and contribute to society.”
The 2023 session began on Jan. 9 and is scheduled to run for 105 consecutive days.
Information provided by Washington State House Republicans, houserepublicans.wa.gov
Also read:
- POLL: Do you support legislation that would lengthen the school year one week to address student learning loss during the COVID-19 pandemic?
Do you support legislation that would lengthen the school year one week to address student learning loss during the COVID-19 pandemic? - Opinion: ‘Democrats have been much better at the game of politics and elections than Republicans and that is hurting people like me’Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance pleads with Republicans to focus more on winning the war with Democrats than the battle with each other.
- Target Zero: Ridgefield officer Cuneta on the lookout for unsafe driversTarget Zero, with the goal of having zero traffic-related deaths on Washington roadways by 2030, is hoping education and enforcement, with the help of law enforcement, will lead to better driving habits.
- Republican lawmakers pressure Sen. Dhingra on police pursuit reform billWashington legislators believe the legislature should at least consider legislation that would lower the bar on when police officers can engage in a vehicular pursuit of criminals.
- WATCH: Pfizer exec on hidden camera: We’re exploring mutating COVID ourselvesTo ‘preemptively develop new vaccines’ will be ‘a cash cow for us,’ reveals latest Project Veritas undercover sting.
- Opinion: Washington’s gas prices have jumped 25 cents per gallon since CO2 tax took effectTodd Myers of the Washington Policy Center continues to make the case that the costs of that policy should be offset by tax cuts and that cost increases should be small.
- Historic ruling: District Court judge blocks doctors’ censorship law in CaliforniaThe judge found that the ‘plaintiffs have established a likelihood of success on the grounds of their Fourteenth Amendment vagueness challenges.’
Sounds good to me.