
The lawsuit accuses Rob Anderson and his Restore Election Confidence Initiative of encouraging unauthorized signature gathering at WinCo stores
VANCOUVER – Rob Anderson, local activist and leader of Reform Clark County, has filed a motion to dismiss a lawsuit brought by WinCo Foods, LLC. The lawsuit, which accuses Anderson and his Restore Election Confidence (REC) Initiative of encouraging unauthorized signature gathering at WinCo stores, is being challenged as an unfounded case that could stifle community participation in Clark County.

The case, WinCo Foods, LLC v. Restore Election Confidence Initiative Committee and Robert Anderson, centers on claims that a volunteer, allegedly linked to Anderson’s initiative, gathered signatures at WinCo locations in violation of instructions. Anderson has submitted affidavits showing that volunteers were clearly directed not to gather signatures at WinCo, and that no formal connection existed with any individual who disregarded this directive.
“This lawsuit isn’t just about the claims against me — it’s about the potential consequences for grassroots efforts in Clark County,” Anderson said. “If WinCo’s lawsuit is successful, it could lead to a chilling effect where public participation in signature gathering at local grocery stores is discouraged, potentially extending far beyond WinCo itself.”
Anderson views the lawsuit as part of a broader concern that businesses could use legal action to deter citizen-led initiatives. He warns that this case could set a precedent, making it more difficult for the public to organize at popular community spaces like grocery stores.
“WinCo’s case could affect anyone in Washington state who wants to support or oppose an initiative. If this lawsuit succeeds, it may become harder for citizens to make their voices heard,” Anderson added.
The REC Initiative, launched in December 2023, aimed to restore public trust in election processes. Although the initiative did not gather enough signatures to qualify for the ballot, Anderson believes the lawsuit may be an effort to cast doubt on the integrity of grassroots movements through legal action.
“Media reports have circulated information that, in our view, misrepresents our initiative and efforts,” Anderson said.
This case has attracted attention for its potential to limit public participation in Clark County politics. Anderson remains committed to defending the rights of local voters and grassroots organizers from what he sees as an attempt to restrict civic engagement.
The motion to dismiss will be heard in Clark County Superior Court. Anderson, representing himself, is also raising funds for legal support. Contributions to support his legal efforts can be made through GiveSendGo | Support Reform Clark County Efforts or visit www.reformclarkcounty.com to sign up for updates.
Also read:
- White House govt. Funding request for 2027 cuts $73 billionPresident Trump’s budget seeks to boost defense funding while cutting $73 billion from agencies like the EPA, NASA, and Agriculture, prompting sharp criticism from Democratic leaders.
- Heywood asks WA Supreme Court to allow referendum effort on income taxBrian Heywood is petitioning the state Supreme Court after the Secretary of State rejected a referendum to repeal Washington’s new 9.9% tax on income over $1 million.
- Opinion: Half the road, full stop – Understanding pedestrian right-of-wayDoug Dahl explains how Washington’s law requires drivers to stop when a pedestrian is within one lane of their half of the road, not just when directly in front.
- Clark County seeks volunteer for Law and Justice CouncilApplicants with experience in mental health services are encouraged to help guide Clark County’s coordination of local criminal justice and corrections planning.
- VIDEO: Families at center of WA transgender sports debate face-to-face with OSPITwo Washington high school students and their parents met with Superintendent Chris Reykdal to discuss concerns about sports policies after one student faced an investigation for harassment.
- As Washington lawmakers punt on school cellphone ban, some want more actionAt Robert Eagle Staff Middle School, all-day phone removal led to fewer conflicts and more student engagement, but some parents and lawmakers argue a ban should not be imposed statewide.
- Opinion: The state’s RFK-proofing bill comes with a costMandates like HB 2242 can lead to higher premiums as insurance companies absorb costs for new preventive services, affecting affordability statewide.








