‘There is a scientific reason for it’
Bob Unruh
WND News Center
A new report cites plans in the state of Montana to make it illegal do donate blood if the donor has had the experimental COVID-19 shots.
“There is a scientific reason for it,” explained the report at the Independent Sentinel.
The report notes that some 80 percent of the state’s blood supply comes from vaccinated donors, but someone receiving such a donation will likely get blood with “a significant amount of spike protein from mRNA vaccines.”
Montana’s plan would ban donors who have gotten the mRNA vaccinations from giving blood. And it would also ban people who have been diagnosed with “Long COVID-19.”
The Daily Montanan said opponents of the legislative plan charge that such a limit would “leave patients at risk of even death.”
A proposed Montana Bill would:
— COVID VACCINE INJURIES .COM (@Storiesofinjury) February 28, 2023
– BAN individuals who received the COVID vaccine from donating blood & make it a misdemeanor with a $500 fine to donate or accept blood from vaccinated donors.
– BAN people who have had a diagnosis of “Long COVID,” https://t.co/URx1EJ6hNB… https://t.co/6HjYVMZJ1J
Cliff Numark, of Vitalant, a blood collection organization, said the change could lead to “adverse patient outcomes including unnecessary and unconscionable death.”
Bill supporters, however, said the issue is about medical autonomy and the right to receive blood from donors not affected by the COVID-19 shots.
“I’m one of many who believe in the God given right of medical freedom, which is having access to genetically unmodified blood during a time of need,” Jo Vilhauer from Miles City, told the publication. “This is a vital part of health autonomy.”
Other political opponents to the concept have been the Montana Nurses Association, the Montana Hospital Association, the Montana Medical Association, and the Montana Primary Care Association.
Also read:
- FDA agrees to remove anti-ivermectin posts off the internet in lawsuit settlement
The Food and Drug Administration has reportedly settled a lawsuit brought by three doctors who accused the health regulator of interfering with their ability to practice medicine and prescribe Ivermectin to treat COVID. - No good news about student learning on 4-year anniversary of COVID school closures
Four years ago this month, schools nationwide shut down as COVID-19 numbers skyrocketed and students were sent home for what was initially planned to be two weeks. - NBA Hall-of-Famer among plaintiffs in lawsuit over WA state COVID-19 restrictionsNBA Hall-of-Famer John Stockton of Spokane is among the plaintiffs suing over alleged free-speech sanctions levied against health care providers who spoke out against state restrictions imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic.
- Opinion: Gov. Inslee wants to be remembered for COVID-19 response?Elizabeth Hovde of the Washington Policy Center doesn’t think Gov. Jay Inslee should remind people of his legacy COVID response.
- Medical freedom conference at local church draws large crowd
A link to a video for a recent conference on medical freedom at Bethel Community Church in Washougal has been taken down by YouTube, but those who were at the event witnessed two doctors calling for individuals to take back their freedom. - Report: COVID-vaccine maker monitored popular critics of the jabPharmaceutical giant Moderna tracked the content of popular media personalities who were critical of the COVID-19 vaccine seeking to censor what the company deemed as “misinformation.”
- WATCH: Tucker Carlson: When do the architects of the COVID catastrophe go on trial?In his latest episode of his Uncensored series on X, Tucker Carlson asked New York Times reporter Alex Berenson when will the architects of the COVID “catastrophe’’ go on trial?
- Doctors no longer forced to sing COVID narrative in one stateThere’s been a victory for free speech as a state law that limited what doctors could say about COVID-19 has hit the trash bin.
wpDiscuz
