New ivermectin study shows 92% lower chance of COVID death

A large study on the impact of using ivermectin as a prophylaxis for COVID-19 found that regular users of the drug experienced up to a 92% reduction in mortality compared to those who did not.

Protection increases with increased usage of politically charged drug

Art Moore
WND News Center

A large study on the impact of using ivermectin as a prophylaxis for COVID-19 found that regular users of the drug experienced up to a 92% reduction in mortality compared to those who did not.

Brazilian research scientist Dr. Flavio A. Cadegiani said via Twitter that his study in his home country showed a “dose-response effect,” meaning that “the more you used, the more protection you had.”

He observed that people who use ivermectin regularly every 15 days for at least six to eight weeks had up to a 92% reduction in mortality.

Cadegiani conducted a previous study of drug that evaluated whether its use could impact COVID-19 infection and mortality rates.

Last fall, esteemed epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Risch of Yale Medical School was among scientists and physicians who said in Senate testimony that thousands of lives could have been saved if treatments such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine had not been suppressed.

In April, after noticing that the word ivermectin was trending on Twitter amid Elon Musk’s move to buy the company, the FDA reprised its disingenuous “horse dewormer” smear of the drug as a treatment for COVID-19.

“Hold your horses, y’all. Ivermectin may be trending, but it still isn’t authorized or approved to treat COVID-19,” said a post on the FDA’s Twitter account.

The reference to horses played on the explosion last fall of media articles and social media posts mocking people who treated COVID-19 with the drug as ignorant rubes who were sneaking into farms or patronizing Tractor Supply stores in quest of “horse dewormer.”

During the pandemic, Twitter and other social media platforms censored positive mention of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine despite the countless testimonies and dozens of studies from around the world showing the drugs to be effective in treating COVID-19.

A follow-up FDA post said: “Also, a reminder that a study showed it didn’t actually work against COVID.”

Dr. Pierre Kory, who has testified to the Senate of the effectiveness of ivermectin against COVID-19, fired back.

“You are not a horse, you are not a cow, you are Big Pharma’s ass,” he tweeted.

The FDA, he wrote, was “messaging BS” by citing “one corrupt study” while ignoring 82 trials, including 33 randomized controlled trials with 129,000 patients from 27 countries that show “massive benefits” of ivermectin in treating COVID-19.

“Stop lying man, people are dying,” he wrote, adding the hashtag “earlytreatmentworks.”

In an article published in April for the Brownstone Institute, Kory wrote that it’s “a tried-and-true tactic with effective and dastardly results” for “Big Pharma and other well-financed interests” to sponsor purportedly impartial medical trials “aimed at discrediting cheaper generic alternatives.’

“Ignoring the flaws in the methodology, the media runs wild with the desired narrative, which is amplified by a well-orchestrated public relations effort,” he wrote.

Kory cited as an example the newly reported clinical trial from Brazil known as “TOGETHER,” which he said ostensibly aimed at studying the effectiveness of ivermectin to treat COVID.

Among the flaws was the lack of explicit exclusion criteria for trial participants on ivermectin, meaning both trial groups had access to the same drug.  Further, the treatment window was set for only three days, which didn’t allow for adequate dosing, and the trial was conducted during the massive gamma variant surge, which was one of the most virulent and deadly COVID variants.

“The dosage of the trial was far lower than everyday Brazilian clinicians were prescribing patients at the time to match the strength of the strain,” Kory pointed out.

“In spite of these and other readily apparent shortcomings, the nation’s leading media gobbled up the results. ‘Ivermectin Didn’t Reduce Covid-19 Hospitalizations in Largest Trial to Date’ blared the Wall Street Journal, while a New York Times headlined announced, ‘Ivermectin Does Not Reduce Risk of Covid Hospitalization, Large Study Finds.'”

Meanwhile, social media platforms stifled conversations while California pushed potentially precedent-setting legislation to punish doctors “who dare question phony studies,” threatening loss of a medical license.

A similar study of ivermectin “of far larger size, conducted by investigators without any conflicts of interest, found the drug led to massive reductions in Covid infection, hospitalization and mortality—yet it received virtually no media coverage.”

Kory said that ending “this cycle of perpetual disinformation requires revamping our dysfunctional drug approval process.”

“An independent board free of pharma industry conflicts must be established to oversee trials for re-purposed medicines,” he said. “Recommendations should be based on trials designed by impartial experts and actual results, not the desired ones, and policymakers or prescribers who ignore the findings should be held accountable.”

And academia and the regulatory agencies must be reminded, he said, “that observational trials data – wherein a sample of population who take a drug are compared to those who do not – is equally valid at informing policy.”

“Randomized controlled trials can yield useful information, but their complexity, costs, and delays to treatment lead to errors and effectively shut out low-cost drugs from the approval process, regardless of their efficacy,” he said.

Also read:


  1. blank

    Then there is this. People wonder why I question everything and very rarely go to the doctor. Ivermectin has been shown time and time again to be effective as an early treatment. We have discussed this here and been lambasted for it. Sigh.

    1. blank

      Please provide a link to your VALID STUDY with no flaws as mentioned above. Long articles with lots of words do not replace valid scientific studies. Jeez.

  2. blank
    Keith Anvick

    Ivermectin has been around for over 40 years and has been proven to be very safe with few side effects for both humans and animals. Globally, it has been prescribed to be very effective for numerous conditions. So beneficial is this drug that in 2015, the 2 researchers who came up with the drug were given the Nobel Peace Prize. The biggest problem with Ivermectin is that it’s now a generic drug that pharmaceutical companies cannot make very much money from selling it. No wonder why the CDC and FDA don’t recommend its’ use because both agencies are strongly influenced by the pharmaceutical industry…..

  3. blank

    Many practitioners have been silenced, deplatformed, vilified and outcast. It is mandatory to use Remdesivir and/or Dexamethasone, both of which cost considerably more than Ivermectin snd have more adverse effects. It is an outright insult to dictate to qualified practitioners how to treat patients. All those years of training count for zilch. Ivermectin is prescription-free in some
    Below is a link to some interesting news, including an article on yet another new bivalent jab:

    I find it abhorrent that patients can no longer participate in deciding what treatments will be used, including what jabs go in their body. I thought it was obvious that the patient is the owner of the body being treated – oooops!!!!
    Follow the money to unravel the truth.

    1. blank
      Deborah Smith

      Remdesivir has caused death I know for a fact. That asking with placing patients on ventilators. It’s disgusting.

    1. blank

      Please refer previous article on this website. The pharmacists in Tennessee may be able to assist in your search.

      “Tennessee governor signs law making ivermectin available without prescription”.

      I do not take any pharma drugs nor any jabs – have not caught any nasties yet.
      Sorry, no personal experience to share as to where to get Ivermectin.

      All the best with your search. Take care!

        1. blank

          Sorry Deborah, I have never used it. See post from Christine below, very helpful and much more practical than ordering from unverified sources.
          Good luck, please nurture your wellness.

  4. blank
    El bochie

    Ivermectin doesn’t beat Covid or other viruses, zinc does. Ivermectin keeps zinc in the cells and that is what makes it great

  5. blank

    I tested positive for Covid yesterday and immediately took some I had bought 6 months ago. I went from feeling like I had a really bad case of the flu to feeling like I had a very mild cold today. On the mend already.

  6. blank

    Ivermectin has been used successfully as an anti-parasitic treatment, and has also helped many during the current PLANdemic. I have never used it, but am aware of many successes.
    My daily regime to keep my immune system robust includes:
    • 6000mg Liposomal C.
    • 6000 IU vit D3 + 180mcg vit K2.
    • 150mcg Selenium.
    • 500mg Quercetin.
    • 105mcg Zinc Gluconate.
    • 600mg Magnesium Glycinate.
    • Activated B-complex (B1-B12).
    • 1.2g Astaxanthin.
    • 150mg Ubiquinol.
    Plus a few others every second day. Those have kept me 100% free of prescription drugs, vaccines/jabs, and illnesses so far. I get the very occasional scratchy throat, which goes in less than 24hrs after upping my Liposomal C to 10,000mg and taking Sage capsules. It works brilliantly for me, but may or may not have the same effect on others. Each person has a unique biochemistry.
    I am only sharing what I take and what has worked for me for many years, ie I am not in any way making any recommendations whatsoever.

  7. blank

    Below us a clear explanation on Ivermectin by someone who has worked with patients:

    “How ivermectin works – and how this plays out in practice”Written by Christine Clark | 20 Apr 2021 | ‘In Discussion With’

    Zinc ionophores, eg Hydroxychloroquin, work a treat.

    Do your own research before making a final decision on any remedies. It is your body, so you are 100% responsible for nurturing it to maintain wellness!

  8. blank

    Here’s another great research paper to peruse:

    Medical Update Online > All Medical News > ‘In Discussion With’ > Ivermectin systematic review confirms efficacy in covid-19

    Despite undeniable scientific evidence, the “disease maintenance” approach persists with mandating Remdesivir, Dexamethasone plus ventilators (instead of oxygen). Why? Follow the money trail.
    The utter disrespect for highly trained, ethical practitioners and the callous disregard for the public is unacceptable.
    How much longer will the majority tolerate it? Trust in authorities is diminishing by the hour. Confidence is all but gone.
    Great news: There is increasing pushback and resistance to the jabs. Let’s keep up the pressure >> together.

  9. blank

    This study has serious methodology flaws and excludes data points that would contradict this conclusion. It is also an observational study without controls and doesn’t take into account various other mitigation efforts. Stick with studies that follow the scientific method and not ones that cherry pick data to get the desired reault

  10. blank

    The lawsuit below is likely to be the first of many more. Highly qualified and ethical speakers who truly care about patient carr and wellness.

    Fresno, CA — Remdesivir Deaths Lawsuit Press Conference×1080.png

    I gained so much from it and hope you do as well.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *