Major paper: Scientists doubt Pfizer’s claims about vaccines

Prominent medical scientists and physicians have been warning for more than a year that the mRNA vaccines were ineffective and posed serious health risks.

Demanding independent review of underlying data

Art Moore
WND News Center

Prominent medical scientists and physicians have been warning for more than a year that the mRNA vaccines were ineffective and posed serious health risks.

Now, a major German newspaper is reporting that doubts are increasing among virologists, epidemiologists and pharmacologists about whether the information provided by the manufacturers is correct.

Die Welt reports the scientists are demanding an independent review of the studies that led to the approval of the BioNtech/Pfizer and Moderna shots.

The primary data supporting the studies, they argue, have been kept under lock and key by the manufacturers.

Last week, a top London cardiologist who was one of the first to take the COVID-19 vaccine and promote it on British television called for a suspension of the shots, arguing in a scientific paper that there is evidence the risk of harm is greater than any benefit.

Dr. Aseem Malhotra, who presented his paper at a news conference in the British capital, said “there is a strong scientific, ethical, and moral case to be made that COVID-19 vaccines rollout must stop immediately until raw data has been released for fully independent scrutiny.”

His paper, published in the Journal of Insulin Resistance in two parts, here and here, is titled “Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine.”


Also read:

Receive comment notifications
Notify of
guest

4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Margaret
Margaret
1 month ago

Previously healthy children, teens, young adults including athletes have suffered adverse health impacts including death after vaccination. Yet the Health Department and Clark County Council in their role as the Board of Health continue to advocate these experimental jabs for residents just 5 years old and up through seniors. Boosters, flu shots added, no end in sight. 

Sylvia
Sylvia
1 month ago

Increasingly, scientific research has demonstrated the many risks of the Covid gene vaccines. In US, a country that boasts about democracy, human rights, freedom of choice/expression, etc, those who dare question the mandated narrative are punished. Slowly but surely Americans are being conditioned: ‘what to think’, ‘what to say’, ‘how to act’. Is this America?
Yet, US has ceaselessly denigrated its ‘enemies’ over violation of human rights despite scant or zero evidence. Meddling at its very best – tactics to distract from worsening internal woes.
The obvious collusion between the CDC, FDA, NIH has the blessing of the current Administration. It is no secret that big pharma pours funds into those organizations – conflict of interest?!?! Not to mention the revolving doors!

https://default.salsalabs.org/T35231c22-e057-4828-b587-eb59d4332092/1f3f68f1-1e32-4c05-aaa5-2940af3c4f91

A few of the studies mentioned in the link above demonstrate “the insanity of continuing down the path of boosters”:

“1. Japanese researchers have found in vitro evidence of antibody-dependent enhancement following Moderna’s mRNA injection.
2. A preprint study posted on bioRxiv in mid-September found Omicron sublineage BA.2.75.2 is exceptionally good at escaping neutralizing antibodies.
3. On average, this sublineage was neutralized fivefold less potently than BA.5, making it the most resistant variant to date. According to the authors, “These data raise concerns that BA.2.75.2 may effectively evade humoral immunity in the population.”
4. Another September preprint by Chinese researchers detail how and why SARS-CoV-2 variants are outracing vaccination efforts, and the role played by original antigenic sin.
5. In addition to BA.2.75.2, other variants with impressive immune evading capabilities include BR.1, BJ.1, and BQ.1.1. According to the authors, many of the variants now emerging have mutations converging in particular “hotspots” on the receptor binding domain (RBD).”
“They suspect this convergent evolution is linked to humoral immune imprinting, in other words, the phenomenon of original antigenic sin, the end result of which is reduced immunity and an increased risk of symptomatic infection.”

Independent research has continued on a global level. Unfortunately, US lacks the intelligence to realize that its WOKE playbook of willful blindness has become an object of local and global contempt and derision.

The question stands: Will US ever overcome its narcissistic grandiosity and develop the rationality to accept that differing viewpoints are equally valid and must be considered on their own merit.

Sylvia
Sylvia
1 month ago

The two discussions below are best viewed with an open, unbiased mind.

The study below is a comparative analysis between children who are unvaxxed and those who are vaxxed:

https://default.salsalabs.org/T8491cb59-f8ce-4327-828e-2da8a6db6a3b/1f3f68f1-1e32-4c05-aaa5-2940af3c4f91

It has been scientifically proven that aluminum, lead, mercury, formaldehyde, chlorine, polyethyleneglycol (PEG), etc are toxic substances that have been used in vaccines for decades.
Below is a great debate about the use of aluminum as an essential adjuvant in most vaccines:

https://default.salsalabs.org/T6eee96bc-0119-4a88-84c4-8df68f4f27e3/1f3f68f1-1e32-4c05-aaa5-2940af3c4f91

Paul Offit MD, is a pediatrician and FDA advisor promotes vaccines and also invests heavily in their manufacture.
James Lyons-Weiler PhD, is a research scientists with zero ties to any drug or vaccine maker.

Sylvia
Sylvia
1 month ago

Scientists have ample evidence to doubt Pfizer’s flip-flopping claims about the mRNA Covid gene vaccines.
The link below reveals a tiny particle of what really goes on behind Pfizer’s closed doors – the admission that the gene vaccine was not tested to stop transmission came from a Pfizer senior executive!

https://default.salsalabs.org/T4b96aa34-863b-4232-902b-c32affe59fba/1f3f68f1-1e32-4c05-aaa5-2940af3c4f91

Recall the contrasting and often conflicting statements from the current Administration:

“A number of officials in the United States and around the world had claimed COVID-19 vaccines could prevent transmission. Among them, President Joe Biden in July 2021 remarked that “you’re not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations.”
Chief Biden administration medical adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci in May 2021 said in a CBS interview that vaccinated people are “dead ends” for COVID-19, suggesting they cannot transmit the virus.
“When you get vaccinated, you not only protect your own health and that of the family but also you contribute to the community health by preventing the spread of the virus throughout the community,” Fauci said.
Two months later, in late July of that year, Fauci said that vaccinated people are capable of transmitting the virus.
In the coming months, Fauci, Biden, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky and others pivoted to say the vaccine prevents severe disease, hospitalization and death from COVID-19.”

The growing distrust, loss of respect, and lack of confidence in the current Administration is of their own making, and is entirely justified.
Instead of initiating open discussions to clarify diverse viewpoints, this Administration has used labels, eg disinformation or misinformation to denigrate those who dare to differ. The reason: this Administration is unable to prove the “dissenters” wrong.
The very same Administration that unjustly labels as ‘dis&misinformants so many credible scientists, clinicians and members of the public, are in fact the real dis&misinformants themselves!
They created this scam-plandemic to serve their evil self-gratifying purposes.

4
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x