Major nation bans COVID vaccine for children under 12

Britain has banned children under age 12 from receiving the COVID-19 vaccine.

Panel argues disease poses little risk, prevalence of natural immunity

Art Moore
WND News Center

Britain has banned children under age 12 from receiving the COVID-19 vaccine.

The decision was made by the government’s Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation, or JCVI, which argued young children are at very low risk of developing severe disease from COVID, and most will have gained natural immunity from infections, the Guardian of London reported.

A member of the JCVI, Adam Finn, professor of pediatrics at the University of Bristol, told the paper that the proportion of parents who had chosen to have their young children immunized had been small.

“The main policy focus right now though … is to try to immunize those who are at highest risk of severe acute COVID as per the recent announcement on the autumn booster program,” said Finn.

In the United States, more than two months since the Food and Drug Administration authorized COVID-19 vaccine doses for children as young as 6 months, a little less under 4% of infants under 2 years old and a little more than 6% of children 2 to 4 years old have received the first dose, the Washington Examiner reported.

In May, despite Pfizer trial data showing the chance of death in children from the shot is 107 times higher than death from COVID-19, the FDA approved Pfizer booster shots for children 5-11.

Members of the FDA’s vaccine advisory panel last fall reluctantly recommended approval of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine for that age group despite a lack of safety data.

A panel member, Dr. Eric Rubin, editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, famously said during the hearing, “We’re never going to learn about how safe the vaccine is unless we start giving it – that’s just the way it goes.”

On Wednesday, Naomi Wolf, who has mobilized a team of experts who are poring over Pfizer clinical trial data released through a lawsuit, said the COVID-19 vaccines are hindering the development of the testes of pre-adolescent boys.

“The vaccines hurt the testes and hurt the parts of the testes that develop the masculinity and secondary sex characteristics of little boys, and baby boys, and teenage boys,” she told Steve Bannon in a “War Room” interview. “So they literally harm the chances of your little boy child to grow up normally as a male human adult.”

Last week, the updating of the U.K. government’s “Summary of the Public Assessment Report for COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech” drew wide attention when it seemed to indicate that pregnant and breast-feeding women should not take the COVID-19 vaccine because their safety could not be guaranteed.

British health officials stated Wednesday that their COVID vaccine advice for pregnant women has not changed, insisting that an updated government safety report was misinterpreted.

However, updated Aug. 16, the document states: “Sufficient reassurance of safe use of the vaccine in pregnant women cannot be provided at the present time.”

The government report says that because of the rapid development of the vaccine – in about one-fifth the minimal time in which previous vaccines were developed – there is an “absence of reproductive toxicity data.”

A spike in severe adverse events among pregnant women coinciding with the vaccine rollout in 2021 has shown up in Department of Defense data and the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System database run by the FDA and the CDC, according to analyses by medical scientists.

Children statistically have virtually no chance of death or serious illness from COVID-19, but, in any case, the experimental vaccines rushed to market under emergency use authorization have proven to be ineffective against the current SARS-CoV-2 variants while posing the risk of severe harm or death in proportions far higher than any vaccine in history.

Children, according to studies, are at low risk of spreading COVID-19. Further, the CDC recently reported higher COVID-19 case rates have been recorded among fully vaccinated children than unvaccinated in the age group 5-11 since February 2022. And the U.K.’s Office for National Statistics found children are up to 52 times more likely to die following the COVID-19 injection than children who have not received it.

Also read:


    1. Wolfie

      The media is against all of this. The media is bought and paid for by the same people making mass money off the jab. The media does not care about nor can they report any truth. We have been saying this since… oh… 2018?

  1. Sylvia

    The UK is to be congratulated for making this long overdue and humane decision. For once a nation is leading the way towards compassion.
    Children’s immune system has not fully developed and should be allowed to mature unhindeted by pharma drugs, including jabs.
    The mRNA jabs may suppress the immune system. Repeated jabs, boosters etc, could cause long term impairment.
    Pregnant women should equally be aware of the potential adverse effects of the jabs. Check out the link below:

    Here’s Why the COVID Vaccine Should Be Banned for Pregnant …

    It is essential to do your own research rather than blindly trusting the mandated narrative. As the owner of your body, you are fully responsible to ensure its wellbeing.

  2. Kara

    This won’t be reported in most mainstream media and is definitely already being suppressed… wonder why?! (lol) Once it is covered, it will be downplayed and the other side of the story will be presented – unlike all of the reporting so far. Any opposing opinions will be given a weighty voice and portrayed much more authoritatively.

    Thank you for doing actual reporting and upholding the true standards of journalistic integrity in the public’s interest!

  3. Sylvia

    There have been reports of multiple cases of seizures in unjabbed children, likely through shedding by the jabbied. The discussion below provides good scientific clarification:

    The guest speaker has a PhD in virology plus a successful research career which was cut short by none other than fauci. Assess it with an open mind if you can. Lots of learning to take away from it.

    Parents have a very diifficult decision to make in the face of all the subterfuge and conflicting messages. It is better to do your own research based on credible facts, rather than putting childten’s immune system at risk – living with guilt and regret will not reverse the damage.

    1. Tiffany

      If kids are in school they are required to 32 shots before prekindergarten. There is no such thing as an unjabbed child. Maybe not an mRNA jab, but plenty of others

  4. Vic Skip

    This is absolutely wonderful. I pray the rest of the World follow suit. I would love for a complete BAN of these COVID Death Shots across ALL ages. Please Don’t get another shot in the arm. You deserve better than what our governments are giving us. I mean , it is actually legal for the United States government to propaganda ( which is LiE )to it’s own people. Take Zinc , Vitamin C & D , and Zeolite to detox from these dastardly
    injections. LOVE to ALL.

  5. P U

    they didn’t ban it. check your facts. very irresponsible for this newspaper to print a headline like this. readers should be warned that this outlet appears to have an agenda that is unconcerned with facts and truth.

  6. Rachel

    For clarification – Naomi Wolf is an author, not a clinician and her claim about the testes is not contained in the report. The reason why they’ve made this change is because the studies didn’t include data for children under 12 – they can’t claim safety or effectiveness if the data is not there. That said, there’s been other studies that have shown that other dangers such as cardiomyopathy are higher in young children than in adults. So whilst I don’t agree with the article, I’m delighted that this decision has been made.

  7. Sylvia

    Below is a link to CDC data on children and jabs, which we should be aware of:

    CDC Reports 5,300 Errors in Vaccine Doses Given to Kids, as Latest VAERS Data Show 155 Reports of Deaths in Children 6 Months to 17 Years Old

    The mere thought of what these children go through is so utterly harrowing – those beautiful small bodies, cruelly and unnecessarily subjected to jabs that ultimately caused suffering. Although the jabs may be well intended, end results like this are food for thought for everyone.
    Once the jab is injected, there is no return. No amount of regret can undo the damage.

  8. Sylvia

    A recent article deserving careful consideration.

    “‘Obsolete, Misguided’: Critics Call Out Pfizer’s Plan for Bivalent Booster for Kids Under 5”

    Thought provoking sections:

    “Without human trials for the “boosters,” said Nass, an internist with special interests in vaccine-induced illnesses, it was “guaranteed that no one would know what their safety issues were — making the whole process of informed consent, which is legally needed for unlicensed vaccines — a charade.”


    “The harm to children from this experimental gene-immunomodulating therapy has been demonstrated by our own CDC, documenting severe illness and death in children who have received this unnecessary vaccine. Placing this series on the vaccination schedule for children gives Pharma an indemnity pass.
    “While government agencies are touting viral strains on communities from other pathogens (i.e., RSV and influenza), it should be emphasized that this viral tsunami has been triggered by the introduction of the COVID-19 vaccine which has disarmed and disabled people’s innate immunity to fight off these other pathogens.”

    The immune system in these very young children has not fully matured, and should ideally be allowed to complete its developmental phase as naturally as possible.

  9. Sylvia

    Something to be aware of:

    ‘Heartbreaking’: “Pharma Eyes Exponential Growth in Multi-Billion Market for Autism Drugs

    Most importantly, do not ignore the side effects that could happen to anyone.

    The question that should be asked, and answered, is:
    What is/are the root cause(s) of Autism Spectrum Disorder?

    Dr Andrew Wakefield, who listened to many parents raising similar problems in their children, then followed up with research, and became an outcast in the UK medical establishment as a result.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *