House Bill 1698 would clarify that all persons selling and serving alcohol for on-premises consumption at a licensed facility need to obtain an alcohol server permit
Rep. Kevin Waters‘ bill that would change the definitions under the alcohol server permit statutes is headed to the Senate after receiving unanimous approval from the Washington State House of Representatives this week.
House Bill 1698 would clarify that all persons selling and serving alcohol for on-premises consumption at a licensed facility need to obtain an alcohol server permit. It would also eliminate special liquor permits and public house liquor licenses.
“This is not a complicated proposal, but it has several small, important changes to clarify the mandatory alcohol server training statutes,” said Waters, R-Vancouver. “This bill would clarify that if you’re an employee involved with selling of alcohol on premise, then you need to have a permit.”
Under HB 1698, the term “retail-licensed premises” would change to “on-premises licensed facility” for statutes regulating alcohol servers. References to specific licenses would be removed from the definition.
Instead, the new definition would reference all licensed facilities that sell or serve alcohol by the glass, drink, or in original containers primarily for on-premises consumption, including on-premises tasting activities regulated under the state’s alcohol laws.
Breweries, microbreweries, beer and wine specialty shops, and spirit retailers with tasting activities would also be included in the definition of an on-premises licensed facility.
Waters added, “Every licensee should know what is expected of them, but current statutes are confusing. This policy would provide needed clarification in the industry and ensure everyone who serves alcohol is following the same rules.”
Meanwhile, the House also unanimously passed House Bill 1731 this week. It would allow museums to notify museum item owners in a more modern way that they have unclaimed property. Currently, they use publications in newspapers and other older methods of contact, which the public doesn’t often see. This would allow them to contact property owners via email, phone, or text.
“Unclaimed property takes up a tremendous amount of space in our museums, which is one of the biggest issues curators deal with, especially in small town museums,” said Waters. “This bill would simply allow museums to use modern technology to inform item owners they can collect their belongings.”
Under HB 1731, museums or societies would have to post a notice at least once a week for three consecutive weeks using a more modern method, including posting on the institution’s official website, sending emails to known owner addresses or public lists, or attempting to call any known phone numbers of the owner.
Both bills now head to the Senate for further consideration.
Information provided by Washington State House Republicans, houserepublicans.wa.gov
Also read:
- VIDEO: WA diesel hits record $6.53, crushing truckers and school budgets
With diesel nearing $6.53 per gallon in Washington, trucking businesses and school districts now confront sharply higher fuel expenses affecting budgets and workers. - WA’s status solidifies as one of the most expensive places in US
A new study shows Washington outpaces most states on cost of living, with metrics revealing a sharp rise in daily expenses and major metro areas ranking among the nation’s most expensive. - Opinion: Someone explain the Democrat Party to me please
Lars Larson criticizes Democrat politicians for shutdown threats, Homeland Security funding refusals, and positions on election laws, housing, and gun rights. - POLL: Do you agree with requiring board members to follow council direction?
Disagreement among county councilors centers on whether C-TRAN board members should reflect the council’s collective wishes or act independently, highlighting ongoing concerns about public accountability. - High-value WA home listings increase by 65% after income tax passage
After lawmakers approved an income tax targeting millionaires, listings for homes priced at $2 million or more jumped 65 percent compared to last year, with experts urging caution about interpreting the spike.
