
“If Jay Inslee wants to see who is to blame for high prices, I’d be glad to supply him with a mirror”
Brett Davis
The Center Square Washington
Gov. Jay Inslee wants legislation to investigate the possibility that fossil fuel companies are profiteering from high gas prices in Washington state.
“Well, people are tired – are sick and tired – of oil and gas companies profiteering on this,” Inslee said last week in answering media questions following a tour of facilities at Hockinson Heights Elementary School in Brush Prairie. “You know, we’re finding companies have profits much higher in our state than other places, and we need to get to the bottom of that. It’s unacceptable to be profiteering.”
Profiteering is defined as the act or activity of making an unreasonable profit on the sale of essential goods, especially during times of emergency.
“So I will be introducing legislation to do that,” the governor said.
The Center Square reached out to the Governor’s Office for more specifics on the possible legislation, asking what evidence Inslee had of profiteering on the part of oil and gas companies and if the state’s carbon tax played any role in Washington having the second-highest gas prices in the nation – more than $5 per gallon – just behind California, according to data from AAA.
“I was asked the same question & quoted in the Center Square not long ago saying the governor doesn’t deny CCA [Climate Commitment Act] has price impacts, but that it’s one piece of a much larger pie,” Mike Faulk, Inslee’s spokesperson, told The Center Square in an email.
Per the Climate Commitment Act passed by the state Legislature and signed into law by Inslee in 2021, Washington’s cap-and-trade program requires emitters to obtain “emissions allowances” equal to their covered greenhouse gas emissions. Similar to stocks and bonds, these allowances can be obtained through quarterly auctions hosted by the Department of Ecology.
Ecology has held three quarterly carbon auctions and one Allowance Price Containment Reserve auction so far this year, bringing in more than $1.4 billion.
“Record profits under record prices and no sense of responsibility for the harm they do the environment and our communities sounds like profiteering to me,” Faulk continued.
As for the proposed legislation, he added, “We don’t have a final proposal yet. Sen. [Joe] Nguyen is the legislative lead in crafting it.”
The Center Square reached out to the Democratic state senator from White Center but did not get a reply.
Larry Behrens, communications director at energy advocacy organization Power The Future, did respond to The Center Square’s request for comment about possible profiteering legislation in Washington.
“Governor Inslee trots out a tired trope because he doesn’t want to take responsibility for his failed leadership,” Behrens said in an email. “For years, Governor Inslee has been a part of the U.S. Climate Alliance and pushing a radical agenda to deliver results like we see today: high prices and economic failure. Jay Inslee cheered as President Biden shut down production all over the country and now he wants to pretend those actions have no consequences. If Jay Inslee wants to see who is to blame for high prices, I’d be glad to supply him with a mirror.”
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- WA and OR scale back I-5 Bridge ambitions as cost balloonsA $14.4 billion price tag prompts Washington and Oregon leaders to delay portions of the I-5 bridge project and prioritize just the main spans.
- Letter: ‘Now we have Engineer Bob telling us the I-5 Bridge needs replacing because it is built on shifting sand with wooden structures’Amboy resident Thomas Schenk critiques Democrat leadership, tax policies, and the addition of light rail to the I-5 Bridge, while urging Republican voters to participate more in midterm elections.
- The I-5 Bridge is vulnerable to collapse, but apparently not that vulnerableState leaders and Vancouver’s mayor warn about bridge safety, but insist it’s safe enough for daily use as they focus on moving forward with a costly replacement including light rail—despite decades of public resistance.
- Opinion: ‘This is not the best and most efficient use of the taxpayers’ funds’Ken Vance critiques the announced $14.4 billion I-5 Bridge replacement, questioning funding gaps, the insistence on light rail, unaddressed congestion, and transparency from state officials.
- Cost for IBR’s total project ‘most likely’ to be $14.4 billionWashington’s governor committed to a light rail bridge across the Columbia River, prioritizing the $7.65 billion initial phase while sidestepping the full project’s $14.4 billion price tag.






