
🎧 Future 42 Scores Local Officials on Key Clark County Votes
The scorecards launch a new annual project aimed at providing Clark County voters with transparent, nonpartisan evaluations of their local elected officials’ performance on key issues affecting the community
CLARK COUNTY — Future 42 Clark County today (May 1) announced the publication of its inaugural local government scorecards evaluating the records of the Vancouver City Council members and Clark County Council members. The scorecards launch a new annual project aimed at providing Clark County voters with transparent, nonpartisan evaluations of their local elected officials’ performance on key issues affecting the community.
Read the Vancouver City Council Scorecard here.
The Vancouver City Council Scorecard assessed how each council member voted on six separate issues and how those votes compared to the position of Future 42 Clark County. The six issues were:
- Rejection of Save Vancouver Streets initiative
- Rental registration fee
- Police services levy
- Ethics violation finding
- Bridge Shelter funding agreement
- Downtown parking changes
Members of the Vancouver City Council often voted against the position of Future 42 Clark County.
Council Member Diana Perez voted against the Future 42 Clark County position on all six issues. Mayor Anne McEnerny-Ogle and Council Member Erik Paulsen voted against the Future 42 Clark County position on five of the six occasions. Council Member Kim Harless voted against the organization’s position four out of five times and recused herself on one vote. Ty Stober voted against the Future 42 Clark County position four out of five times and was absent on one occasion. Council Members Bart Hansen and Sarah Fox voted in favor of the Future 42 Clark County positions on two of the six issues.

Read the Clark County Council Scorecard here.
The County Council Scorecard assessed how each Clark County councilor voted on five separate issues and how those votes compared to the position of Future 42 Clark County. The five issues were:
- Homeless Housing First Plan
- Property tax increases in 2026 budget
- Belkot C-TRAN Board removal and OPMA investigation
- Clark County growth and farmland
- Light rail funding policy
On all five occasions, Councilors Sue Marshall and Wil Fuentes voted against the Future 42 Clark County position. Councilor Glen Yung voted against the Future 42 Clark County position four out of five times. Councilor Matt Little voted against the organization’s position three out of five times. Councilor Michelle Belkot voted in favor of the Future 42 Clark County position four of the five times.
The scorecards were developed to give residents clear insight into how local leaders are voting on major policy issues. They build on the success of Future 42’s previous legislative scorecards assessing Clark County’s state representatives and senators and expand the effort to the local level. The evaluations focus on votes on taxes, regulations, housing affordability, public safety, infrastructure, and other critical local priorities.

“Publishing these Council scorecards is an important step in increasing government accountability right here at home,” said Leslie Lewallen, director of Future 42 Clark County. “Voters deserve straightforward information to make informed decisions. These annual scorecards will serve as a reliable, year-over-year resource to track performance and encourage policies that help Clark County families and businesses thrive.”
The scorecards are publicly available on the Future 42 website at future42.org/clarkscorecards and include detailed breakdowns of key votes and actions, along with explanations of the criteria used for evaluation. Future 42 Clark County plans to update and release the scorecards annually to support ongoing education and engagement efforts.
Future 42 Clark County invites residents, media, and community leaders to review the scorecards and participate in the conversation about building a more prosperous future for the region. For more information, interview requests, or access to the full scorecards, contact Leslie Lewallen through future42.org.
About Future 42 Clark County
Future 42 Clark County is the local chapter of Future 42, a statewide organization working to change the course of Washington by advocating for common-sense policies that reduce taxes, lower the cost of living, enhance public safety, and foster economic opportunity. Launched in Clark County in 2025 under the leadership of Director Leslie Lewallen and advisory committee, the chapter focuses on local issues while connecting residents to broader efforts for a more prosperous state.
Also read:
- Cost to battle 20 wildfires in WA has topped $200MTwenty wildfires have cost Washington $207M in one month, more than two-thirds of what DNR spent all last fiscal year.
- Former State Rep. Liz Pike provides update on husband Neil CahoonNeil Cahoon, a Camas resident, has undergone multiple surgeries including five on Aug. 15 after the Aug. 10 crash near La Center’s Daybreak Airport.
- Auditor, auditor candidate address scrutiny over job titleGreg Kimsey says roughly 40 county employees hold the deputy county auditor designation Kelly used in his campaign.
- Ridgefield Waterfront plans meet resistance: Community voices weigh inResidents opposing Ridgefield’s waterfront development cite scale, wildlife impact, and inadequate boat launch parking as key concerns.
- Gunfire at Hockinson Park leaves one dead; BGHS graduate, UW baseball signee charged with manslaughterTrent Richardson, 18, died from a gunshot wound at Hockinson Meadows Community Park; James Gill III charged with second-degree manslaughter.






