The two related sets of issues are now on track to be dealt with separately
Jacquelyn Jimenez Romero
Washington State Standard
A tense debate over the rights of public school students and their parents took another twist in the Washington Legislature on Thursday.
Democrats on a Senate committee stripped a House bill of provisions dealing with parental rights, while leaving parts covering students’ rights. A Senate-approved bill on parental rights is still pending in the House, setting up a situation where the two related sets of issues are on track to be handled with separate pieces of legislation.
The Senate Early Learning and K-12 Education Committee passed the amended version of House Bill 1296 on a party-line vote.
Sen. Claire Wilson, D-Auburn, put forward the amendment that removed the language about parental rights, and said it was part of a strategy to keep the bills moving forward to address some of the issues involved before the session ends on April 27.
“It’s keeping all doors open and all windows open so we can make sure something ends on the other side,” Wilson said.
Rep. Monica Stonier, D-Vancouver, sponsor of the House bill, said that she would have rather not seen this language removed from the bill, but that the end goal is still the same: to have policies covering students’ rights and parental rights.
“There’s nothing in my mind that doesn’t allow for students’ rights to exist concurrently with parental rights, I don’t see any conflict there,” Stonier said.
Examples of students’ rights included in HB 1296 include the right to learn in a safe, supportive learning environment, free from harassment, intimidation, or bullying; to receive copies of all school policies and procedures related to students; and to access academic courses and instructional materials with historically and scientifically accurate information.
Wilson’s rewrite also added language from another bill she sponsored, Senate Bill 5179, which is about reporting complaints to the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction when certain policies are not followed by schools.
The parental and students’ rights legislation now under discussion is tied to a citizen initiative lawmakers approved last year.
That measure, Initiative 2081, called for public school materials, such as textbooks, curriculum and a child’s medical records, to be easily available for review by parents. It also sought to clear the way for parents to opt their child out of assignments and other activities involving questions about the student’s sexual experiences or their family’s religious beliefs.
Democrats said when Initiative 2081 was approved, they would likely need to clean up some of the language to align with other state and federal laws.
But Republicans argue that Democrats are now trying to roll back rights granted to parents in the initiative. Mixed into the debate are arguments over gender and transgender issues in schools.
“This bill continues the war against parents’ rights and puts girls at risk at schools,” said Sen. Jim McCune, R-Graham.
Senate Bill 5181, the Senate bill on parental rights, is scheduled for a possible committee vote on March 31 in the House Education Committee. Stonier, sponsor of the House bill, is among the committee’s members.
This report was first published by the Washington State Standard.
Also read:
- Fight over counting mail-in ballots after Election Day will go before Supreme Court
The U.S. Supreme Court will hear a Mississippi case that could upend mail-in ballot counting in Washington and other vote-by-mail states. - Mahsa Eshghi wins Camas City Council election
Mahsa Eshghi, a civil engineer and political newcomer, defeated incumbent Leslie Lewallen to win the Camas City Council Ward 3 Position 2 race by a wide margin. - Opinion: Fighting for affordability and protecting your rightsRep. John Ley provides a legislative update focused on affordability, parental rights, healthcare costs, and major transportation challenges, including the IBR project.
- Opinion: A Commie in Gotham CityLars Larson’s latest column criticizes Democratic victories across the nation, highlighting what he views as troubling trends in liberal politics from coast to coast.
- Bart Hansen gives election perspective from city councilor who was not on the ballotVancouver City Councilor Bart Hansen reflected on election night, expressing gratitude to candidates, support for Proposition 5, opposition to Charter Amendment No. 13, and a call for more open public communication.
With a Democrat majority in both House and Senate, I really do not see them trying to comply with Initiative 2081 on Parents Bill of Rights. We homeschooled our sons from 2nd grade to 11th grade and then transferred to a Christian high school that accepted out home school grade reports and converted to usable credits for graduation.
That measure, Initiative 2081, called for public school materials, such as textbooks, curriculum and a child’s medical records, to be easily available for review by parents. It also sought to clear the way for parents to opt their child out of assignments and other activities involving questions about the student’s sexual experiences or their family’s religious beliefs.
We are now involved for our grandkids and great grands. If the above protections in I2081 are not included in the final, then my suggestion to parents with kids is seek a private school who recognizes that God ordained parents as the first and only authority to raise their kids that God gave them. Otherwise homeschool.
Agreed… but the finances involved in putting a child in a private school are out of reach for many (most?) families.
Add in the fact that a property-owning family is paying for public schools thru their property taxes, then they also have to pay for the private school… meaning they are paying twice for their child’s schooling.
The answer? Hold schools accountable for their (ever-declining) test scores. Hold school districts accountable for adhering to citizen initiatives such as 2081. Chances of either one of these happening in this blue utopian state… zero.
When we were raising our children, we sat down and decided to prioritize their education. We were middle income at that time. We placed them in a private religious school and applied for a discounted tuition with the school and received it. I know it is very difficult, and we had to do without other things, but we are glad we did it.