
Long-term funding solutions need to be addressed in 2025
VANCOUVER – The Clark County Council this week voted 3-2 to approve the annual budget for 2025. The total expense budget for 2025 is $871.74 million.
The county’s budget has an ongoing structural deficit, a systemic problem that results from expenses growing faster than revenues. The approved budget addresses urgent and immediate needs; however, it does not encompass many areas where additional funding will be required in future years. The recommended property tax levy options, including 1% increases for the General Fund, Road Fund, Conservation Futures Fund (with banked capacity), and the Greater Clark Parks District Fund (with banked capacity), were not approved. The council voted to bank the capacity for each of the levies for potential future use.
County Manager Kathleen Otto recommended a budget to the county council that prioritized maintaining appropriate reserve levels, minimizing service impacts on residents, and addressing critical needs and liabilities.
“I want to extend my sincere gratitude to all departments and elected officials for their budget submissions and for collaborating with me throughout the budget process,” said Otto. “I am continually impressed by the dedication to public service and deeply appreciate the ongoing efforts of all staff to ensure we deliver quality services to our community.”
Otto said she will hold planning sessions for the new council in early 2025 to develop strategies for addressing projected shortfalls in the 2026 budget process and beyond.
Information on the county budget can be found on the county website at clark.wa.gov/budget. Videos of the budget hearings will be available at clark.wa.gov/councilors/clark-county-council-meetings.
Information provided by Clark Co. WA Communications.
Also read:
- Letter: Facts aren’t politicalBrian Kendall writes that disagreements about the LEOFF 1 pension debate should begin with accurate facts rather than misinformation.
- Opinion: Trails, roadways and crosswalksDoug Dahl explains how Washington law treats hiking trails that cross roadways and whether pedestrians automatically have the right-of-way.
- Business Profile: Joyful Honey and Beekeeping Supplies making a difference for pollinatorsJoy Bochsler’s Battle Ground shop offers honey, equipment, and classes while helping educate the community about protecting pollinators.
- Opinion: Supreme Court’s ruling should end state’s bullying of the La Center School DistrictKen Vance argues a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on parental rights in education could influence the ongoing dispute between the La Center School District and Washington state officials over gender pronoun policies.
- State high school basketball: Five local teams to play in quarterfinal games Thursday, March 5Five Clark County basketball teams advanced to state quarterfinal games after Columbia River, Columbia Adventist, Evergreen, and Seton Catholic won Wednesday and Union had already secured its spot.
- Opinion: Neighbors for a Better Crossing urges Oregon Legislators to demand full audit of IBR project, echoing Washington’s HB 2669Gary Clark of Neighbors for a Better Crossing urges Oregon lawmakers to pursue an audit of the Interstate Bridge Replacement project similar to Washington’s HB 2669 proposal.
- Opinion: ‘Privacy’ is not a license for government secrecy – Supreme Court’s Mirabelli Ruling puts Washington’s school parental notification policies on noticeVicki Murray argues a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on parental notification policies could affect Washington’s approach to student gender identity nondisclosure in schools.








