
The Clark County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office forwarded the initiative to the auditor’s office, and the proposed initiative has a number and a ballot title
In a swift turn of events, the recent filing of a Writ of Mandamus by Reform Clark County Founder Rob Anderson, sponsor of the “Restore Election Confidence” initiative, has compelled the Clark County Prosecutor’s Office to reconsider its rejection of the proposed measure. The Writ, filed with a Skamania County judge Monday, attempted to expose what Anderson felt was a failure to comply with the Clark County Home Rule Charter, prompting the prosecutor’s office to reach out to Anderson to seek a resolution.
The day after the filing of the Writ, Anderson said Leslie Lopez, chief civil deputy at the prosecutor’s office, initiated a conversation conveying their intention to reverse the decision and move forward with the evaluation and processing of the initiative. During this conversation, it was proposed that if the prosecutor’s office created a ballot title and forwarded it to the auditor, Anderson would consider withdrawing the filed Writ.
In response to this development, Anderson stated, “They got caught, and I’m glad they have decided to follow the Charter, and people will see that this is a legal initiative that follows all the requirements.”
Later Tuesday evening, the prosecutor’s office sent a follow-up letter confirming the reversal of their decision and committing to forwarding the “Restore Election Confidence” initiative to the auditor on Thursday (Jan. 11). Anderson, however, expressed lingering concerns regarding the deviation from the Charter’s guidelines in the review process and potential impacts on free speech and the right to petition.
In a written reply to the prosecutor’s office, Anderson thanked them for the decision to reverse the initial rejection but raised critical concerns about the impact on free speech and public trust. He requested that the prosecutor’s office issue a public statement announcing the reversal and commit to strictly following Charter guidelines for proper legal review within 48 hours. Anderson offered to withdraw the Writ within 48 hours of the publication of the requested statement.
As the “Restore Election Confidence” initiative moves closer to proper evaluation and consideration, Anderson emphasizes the importance of adherence to Charter guidelines to uphold the democratic process and avoid unnecessary confusion and suppression of speech.
In a reply to Lopez, Anderson wrote, “I see these actions as potentially suppressing speech and impacting the People’s right to petition, which could result in the future suppression of signature collection. This concern is well-grounded, considering the unnecessary communications from their office are now being utilized by local media. This is likely to have a chilling effect on future activities, in addition to the present erosion of public trust in your office.
“Articles have been written, and some of the press have spread the improper legal opinions from the Prosecuting Attorney’s Office regarding the ‘rejected initiative,’’ which Anderson believes might have been the goal all along. “It looks like they wanted to block people’s free speech through the initiative process and, at a minimum, provide fuel to suppress signature gathering, and some of the press was eager to go along.”
“No one knows the Charter more than the Clark County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office, and they chose to ignore it. Thankfully, Ms. Lopez, chief civil deputy of the prosecuting attorney’s office, recognized it and took quick action to turn this around and, in the end, really helped to make the initiative even better.”
Eventually, on Friday (Jan. 12), as a result of the filed Writ of Mandamus, the Clark County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office forwarded the initiative to the auditor’s office, and the proposed initiative has a number and a ballot title.
For updates and further information, visit www.reformclarkcounty.com.
Also read:
- Opinion: ‘This is not the best and most efficient use of the taxpayers’ funds’Ken Vance critiques the announced $14.4 billion I-5 Bridge replacement, questioning funding gaps, the insistence on light rail, unaddressed congestion, and transparency from state officials.
- Cost for IBR’s total project ‘most likely’ to be $14.4 billionWashington’s governor committed to a light rail bridge across the Columbia River, prioritizing the $7.65 billion initial phase while sidestepping the full project’s $14.4 billion price tag.
- Natural gas leak forces evacuation in restricted area in VancouverCrews closed multiple streets and evacuated about 20 Vancouver homes after a gas line was damaged by workers. C-TRAN provided a bus to shelter residents during the incident.
- Letter: Don’t leave Longview in the darkLongview Mayor Erik Halvorson warns that uncertainty in Washington’s energy policy is deterring manufacturing investment, citing a local project’s move to the Gulf as evidence of this statewide challenge.
- OnPoint Community Credit Union welcomes Lisa White as CFOFinance veteran Lisa White will oversee financial operations at OnPoint, drawing on two decades of leadership and her work with Girls on the Run and Columbia Bank.
- Ridgefield student to serve as Rotary Club’s youth ambassador to central MexicoRidgefield High’s Zander Earl was chosen as Rotary’s youth ambassador and will spend his junior year studying in central Mexico, immersed in both the language and local culture.
- Opinion: Hiring someone for jobs around the house?Households in Washington that hire caregivers or cleaners will have to keep records, offer contracts, and follow new compliance rules under HB 2355.








