
This recreational fire restriction is in addition to the general outdoor burning prohibition that was implemented on July 1
VANCOUVER – Due to the extreme fire danger, recreational fires will be prohibited throughout unincorporated Clark County effective 12:01 a.m., Sunday, Aug. 13.
This recreational fire restriction is in addition to the general outdoor burning prohibition that was implemented on July 1.
These types of fires are prohibited with this recreational fire ban until further notice:
- Recreational fires and bonfires
- Campfires
- Fires in outdoor fireplaces, fire pits and chimney-type devices
According to Interim Fire Marshal Curtis Eavenson this is a preventive measure to reduce the risk of grass or brush fires as a result of escaped campfires.
“The ban is being implemented due to the upcoming weather forecast of extremely hot and dry conditions next week,” said Eavenson. “The forecasted hot, dry weather and a lack of humidity over the next week will increase the potential for fire danger.”
Creating a defensible space around a home helps prevent wildfires from spreading to a residence, or vice versa. Eavenson recommends the following measures in both rural and urban areas:
- Remove fuel:
- Within 3-5 feet of foundations, outbuildings, garages and sheds
- Within 10 feet of a house
- Under decks and porches
- From gutters, eaves, porches and decks
- Cut the lawn if it is brown. Dispose of debris and cuttings.
- Prune trees so the lowest branches are 6-10 feet above the ground.
- Landscape with native and flame-resistant plants.
Self-contained camp stoves and charcoal barbeques, which are not banned, are a safe and easy alternative for outdoor cooking.
Information provided by Clark Co. WA Communications.
Also read:
- Birthday party: Sons of American Revolution honor World War II veteran after turning 100The Sons of the American Revolution honored Vancouver resident and World War II veteran Alfred Folkerts for a lifetime of service following his 100th birthday.
- Letter: Interstate Bridge Replacement $13.6 billion estimate is too low! Bob Ortblad argues the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s $13.6 billion cost estimate understates the true expense, citing comparable projects, construction challenges, and engineering assumptions.
- Opinion: ‘The drama and the waste of taxpayer money continues’Rep. John Ley outlines his objections to the approved fixed-span I-5 Bridge design, citing cost concerns, engineering standards, funding uncertainty, and opposition to light rail and tolls.
- Coast Guard approves fixed-span design for new Interstate BridgeThe U.S. Coast Guard has approved a fixed-span design for the new Interstate Bridge, clearing a major hurdle for the Interstate Bridge Replacement project.
- Business Profile: Handel’s Ice Cream opens its first shop in Washington, in VancouverHandel’s Ice Cream has opened its first Washington location in east Vancouver, with a grand opening planned for Jan. 17.
- Opinion: Why vote no on the Battle Ground School District levy?Dick Rylander outlines why he believes voters should reject the Battle Ground School District levy, citing costs, enrollment trends, test results, and district spending priorities.
- Letter: The multi-million dollar cash grab in Washington schoolsYacolt resident Mark Rose argues that rising superintendent salaries conflict with classroom cuts and repeated levy requests in Clark County school districts.








