POLL: Did the council’s debate and resolution help unite or divide the community?

The Clark County Council’s 3-2 vote to move forward with a modified ICE-related resolution followed heated public comment and sharp debate among councilors.
The Clark County Council’s 3-2 vote to move forward with a modified ICE-related resolution followed heated public comment and sharp debate among councilors.

Council’s 3-2 vote on ICE resolution sparks heated exchanges, emotional public comment, and disagreement over the county’s role

The Clark County Council voted 3-2 to move forward with a modified resolution addressing federal immigration enforcement activities, but not before more than an hour of intense public comment and a lengthy debate among councilors. Some anti-ICE activists said the language did not go far enough, while several law enforcement supporters argued the resolution risks dividing the community. Councilors also clashed over jurisdiction, racial profiling language, support for local law enforcement, and whether the county should “condemn” or simply say it is “alarmed” by reported ICE tactics. As the resolution heads toward a formal reading at the Feb. 17 meeting, we want to know: Did this debate and decision help unite Clark County — or deepen divisions?

POLL: Did the council’s debate and resolution help unite or divide the community?
121 votes

More info:


Also read:

Receive comment notifications
Notify of
guest

1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
1
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x