Mark Harmsworth writes that minimum wages sound compassionate, but they ignore basic economics: when labor costs spike artificially, employers reduce hiring, training, and expansion
Mark Harmsworth
Washington Policy Center
In a follow up to the Washington Policy Centers article showing the immediate negative effects of minimum wage increases in California, a new report from the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) has confirmed that high minimum wages means less jobs and less hours for workers.
The consequences of an aggressive $20-per-hour minimum wage for fast-food workers are now painfully clear. Assembly Bill 1228 (AB1228) enacted in September 2023 and taking full effect in April 2024, was hailed by Governor Gavin Newsom as a “win-win-win” for workers, businesses, and the economy.
The report from the NBER paints a starkly different picture: an estimated 18,000 fewer jobs in the fast-food sector alone, a direct fallout from the policy’s impact.
The NBER study, drawing on data from the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, reveals a 2.7% employment drop in California’s fast-food industry compared to national trends from September 2023 to September 2024. Adjusting for pre-law trajectories bumps that figure to 3.2%, underscoring how the wage hike disrupted an already fragile recovery in the sector.
These aren’t abstract numbers, they translate to real families losing entry-level opportunities, particularly for young workers who rely on these jobs as steppingstones to further education and higher paying jobs.
Preempting the hike in minimum wage, chains like Pizza Hut axed 1,200 delivery driver roles. Post-implementation, restaurant closures multiplied, and automation surged, think self-service kiosks hastily installed by franchisees desperate to reduce labor costs.
The Employment Policies Institute quantifies the human toll: non-tipped restaurant workers forfeited up to 250 hours annually, equating to $4,000 in lost wages per employee, roughly seven weeks of full-time pay.
As minimum wage increases ripple across U.S. states, policymakers elsewhere must pay attention to what the data is showing. Higher wage floors don’t magically lift all boats; they often sink the smallest vessels first, fueling inflation in menu prices and reduced hours for those who need work most.
The Washington Policy Center has long advocated market-driven solutions over top-down mandates. Minimum wages sound compassionate, but they ignore basic economics: when labor costs spike artificially, employers reduce hiring, training, and expansion. The NBER’s findings aren’t outliers, they align with decades of research showing wage floors disproportionately harm low-skill sectors like fast food, where margins are razor-thin.
It’s time for a course correction. Lawmakers should prioritize skills training, tax incentives for small businesses, and deregulation to foster genuine opportunity. California’s experiment proves that good intentions pave a road to fewer paychecks.
Mark Harmsworth is the director of the Small Business Center at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- Opinion: IBR promotes ‘giving away’ historic interstate bridges while withholding cost estimate for replacement
Neighbors for a Better Crossing argues the IBR program is promoting demolition of the historic Interstate Bridges without releasing updated cost estimates or current seismic data to justify replacement. - Opinion: Solving Washington’s deficit without tax increases
Ryan Frost argues Washington’s budget shortfall is driven by rapid spending growth rather than insufficient tax revenue, calling for slower spending and program reductions instead of new taxes. - Opinion: Bikes in crosswalks
Doug Dahl explains how Washington law treats bicycles as both vehicles and pedestrians, depending on where and how they are being ridden. - Opinion: The unpreferred and unaffordable Interstate Bridge replacement proposal
Rep. John Ley argues that the Interstate Bridge Replacement proposal is unpreferred, unaffordable, and failing to address congestion, cost transparency, and community concerns. - POLL: If project costs continue to rise, what should lawmakers do with the I-5 Bridge replacement plan?
This poll asks readers what lawmakers should do with the I-5 Bridge replacement plan as costs rise and key decisions remain unresolved.
