Law enforcement pledges to continue to offer resources to individuals in need, and the goal is not to punish but simply to end the illegal activity
Paul Valencia
Clark County Today
Members of the Camas City Council on Monday voted to ban camping in public areas and public sidewalks, a move that became an option in 2024 after a Supreme Court ruling.
The Supreme Court overturned a lower court’s decision that said that ordinances against camping criminalized homelessness. For years, a city could not ask the homeless to move on or stop camping in public spaces unless the city had a place for them to live — a shelter, for example.
In 2024, in Grants Pass vs. Johnson, the Supreme Court ruled that camping bans on public property regulated conduct, not the status of the individual who was camping. That has opened the door for cities across the country to enact bans or strengthen law already on the books. By some accounts, more than 200 cities have done just that.
Including Camas.
Ordinance No. 25-015 amends the city’s municipal code relating to unlawful camping and storage of personal property on public property.
The ordinance notes that public property “is intended to be used by the public for public purposes,” including recreational use, pedestrian, bicycle, and other public uses. Camping without adequate sanitation services presents a public health and safety concern.
Enacting this ordinance would allow the city greater ability to address unauthorized encampments or obstructions on city streets, sidewalks, parks, and other public property.
After some discussion at Monday night’s City Council meeting, the councilors voted unanimously to approve the ordinance.
Camas Chief of Police Tina Jones said her officers will still work with the homeless in offering available resources. Police officers would have discretion on how long it should take for a camper to gather belongings and move along from the site.
In fact, that is specifically noted in the ordinance language: A law enforcement officer … shall provide notice to the individual engaged in a violation and allow a reasonable opportunity to cease the illegal activity.
What is reasonable? That depends on the officer’s discretion, Jones said.
The goal is not to punish. The goal is to end the illegal activity.
“Is everybody going to comply? Probably not,” Jones told the council. “Sometimes we are encountering people with mental illness. We are trying to get them connected to resources.”
Jones said she will want her officers to lean on their supervisors to get advice “in those situations that are in the gray. It’s not always black and white.”
Before the Supreme Court’s ruling on Grants Pass vs. Johnson, cities were required to offer alternative living accommodations before moving a camper.
Even with the new ordinance, Jones said her department will still work with an individual.
“We have resource guides, and we still try to connect people with resources,” Jones said. “It’s still a practice that we encourage our team to help people to understand where the regional resources are.”
The new ordinance does have penalties, as well. But, again, the goal is to end the illegal activity first. So the first option is for a law enforcement officer to explain the new law and allow a “reasonable” opportunity for the illegal activity to cease.
If that reasonable time elapses, a first citation can be issued. A second citation would carry a larger fine as well as a 30-day exclusion order from the particular public property. A third offense could lead to a criminal trespass charge.
Also read:
- Letter: ‘President Trump has stopped the flooding’
Camas resident Anna Miller argues that the immigration system’s due process framework has failed under volume and backlog, and credits President Donald Trump with prioritizing enforcement to stop illegal border crossings. - Washington begins to assess damage from record flooding
State and local officials are assessing widespread damage after record flooding across western Washington, with thousands still under evacuation orders and more rain in the forecast. - Youth Efforts Against Hunger delivers 10,500 pounds of high-quality protein to Clark County Food Bank
Youth Efforts Against Hunger delivered 10,500 pounds of high-quality protein to the Clark County Food Bank, turning youth projects at the Clark County Fair into thousands of meals for local families. - Letter: ‘If we want workable immigration reform, we must first restore basic human dignity to the debate’
Vancouver resident John Ford argues that restoring human dignity to public discourse is essential before meaningful immigration reform can occur. - Santa’s Posse delivers Christmas joy once again
Hundreds of volunteers joined Santa’s Posse to deliver toys and food to 1,500 families across Clark County, continuing a long-running holiday tradition rooted in community service. - Opinion: Is the cheap fast-food burger a thing of the past?
Mark Harmsworth argues that rising minimum wages and B&O tax increases are driving higher food prices and squeezing low-income consumers and small businesses across Washington state. - Opinion: Blood on the highways fails to move Ferguson and Kotek
Lars Larson criticizes Washington and Oregon governors over licensing policies he says are linked to deadly truck crashes and ongoing highway safety risks.
The exodus from Camas to East Vancouver is already well underway. Sunday I saw 4 SUV’s dropping off “homeless” and all of their crap at Mill Plain and I-205. They are infesting WSDOT property as fast as they can.
And why not?? Mayor Annie just loves her houseless constituents and just can’t get enough of them into our neighborhoods. There isn’t a law, ordinance, or regulation that Vancouver will not excuse on behalf of any vagrant, no matter what they do.
You get exactly what you vote for, good and hard.
well stated! so true!
How about a little Homeless Math today??
Vancouver’s 120 bed “Bridge Shelter” is estimated to cost $16 Million to construct. That’s $134,000 per bed.
It is estimated to cost $7 Million to operate the first year. That’s $58,300 per bed, regardless if the shelter is at capacity or not.
All of the vagrant villages are getting an expensive upgrade to provide hot showers, laundry, and flush toilets. Costs include trucking water in and sewage back out.
Vancouver is holding off “for now” on a fifth “Safe Rest Village”. The last I heard, they bought the huts for it a couple of years ago and have them stored away someplace, ready to install. Coming to a neighborhood near you.
I read the Homeless Emergency Updates Jamie Spinelli files with City Clowncil every month, and it is impossible to determine if any of those “villages” are actually at capacity at any given time. I see lots of circumstantial clues such as how many vagrants are ineligible foe shelter, and how many refused shelter. The biggest homeless camp downtown is rife with registered sex offenders, and the Columbian recently reported there may be as many as 366 of them here in town.
So what happens to the vagrants, other than the lucky 120, who are ineligible, or refuse to move in to a bridge shelter?? Are they going to continue to be allowed to camp on the streets and sidewalks like they are right now?? Mill Plain and I-205 is beginning to far surpass the filthiness for the Mill Plain sound wall encampment as the vagrant migration out of Camas continues.
Ever wonder how much your grocery bill goes up to replace all of those stolen(and destroyed) shopping carts??
Where does it end?? There will never be enough money to keep Mayor Annie’s Magic Vagrant Gravy Train on the tracks….talk about Loot Rail!!
well stated! so true!
Vancouver MUST elect a new Mayor who will put the city back on track in the right direction. Mayor annie sure isn’t! She needs to go away!
If there are no beds, and no shelters, and they are not allowed to camp. Where do they go?