The proposed light rail extension into Vancouver has sparked a heated debate, with questions arising about Washington taxpayers’ responsibility for funding 45% of the annual operating and maintenance costs.
Some argue this cost-sharing is a fair contribution to an infrastructure project that promises regional benefits. Others contend that it places an undue financial burden on Washington residents for a project driven largely by Oregon’s transit needs.
We want to hear from you!
More info here:
Opinion: TriMet should receive the Golden Fleece Award
John Ley critiques TriMet's funding demands for the IBR, calling it a taxpayer fleecing.
Read more
Make your voice heard and join the conversation! Voting is quick and easy—let us know what you think.
Stay informed about this and other pressing issues at ClarkCountyToday.com.
Also read:
- Opinion: IBR creates 50,000 road refugees
Lars Larson argues IBR’s tolling plan would push 50,000 daily commuters off I-5 onto I-205. - Opinion: It’s time to save taxpayers from Sound Transit’s strategic misrepresentation
Sound Transit’s ST3 rail program faces a $35 billion shortfall, and Southwest Washington taxpayers could bear new costs. - C-TRAN board asks IBR to bring light rail to Library Square, with no protection for taxpayers
C-TRAN’s board rejected 7-2 an amendment shielding taxpayers from extra costs tied to a light rail extension that could approach $1 billion. - Letter: Why Washington state families are paying for local & foreign policy failures at the pump
Jonathan Hines argues Washington’s $0.554/gal fuel tax turns global instability into a state windfall. - Expect daytime delays on I-5 in Clark and Cowlitz counties for weigh-in-motion scale inspections May 12 and 14
WSDOT closes I-5 right lanes near Ridgefield and Kelso for weigh-in-motion scale inspections May 12 and 14.
wpDiscuz
