The proposed light rail extension into Vancouver has sparked a heated debate, with questions arising about Washington taxpayers’ responsibility for funding 45% of the annual operating and maintenance costs.
Some argue this cost-sharing is a fair contribution to an infrastructure project that promises regional benefits. Others contend that it places an undue financial burden on Washington residents for a project driven largely by Oregon’s transit needs.
We want to hear from you!
More info here:
Opinion: TriMet should receive the Golden Fleece Award
John Ley critiques TriMet's funding demands for the IBR, calling it a taxpayer fleecing.
Read more
Make your voice heard and join the conversation! Voting is quick and easy—let us know what you think.
Stay informed about this and other pressing issues at ClarkCountyToday.com.
Also read:
- Rep. John Ley files legislation to prevent tolling on the I5 Bridge Replacement Project
Rep. John Ley introduces House Bill 1559 to block tolling on the I-5 Bridge Replacement, citing financial burdens for Southwest Washington commuters. - County Councilor Michelle Belkot presses for C-TRAN board/public discussion on light rail fundingClark County Councilor Michelle Belkot joins C-TRAN board members in opposing Southwest Washington taxpayers funding TriMet’s light rail extension into Vancouver.
- Camas City Council member joins opposition to funding for light rail extension operations and maintenance
Camas City Council opposes costly light rail funding for TriMet Yellow Line extension, citing limited benefits for taxpayers in Southwest Washington. - TriMet’s $21.8 million demand for light rail subsidies continues to be questionedDebate heats up over TriMet’s $21.8M light rail subsidy request for Vancouver.
- Safer pedestrian crossing coming to SR 503 near Prairie High School in VancouverNew HAWK signal boosts safety for pedestrians crossing SR 503 near Prairie High School in Vancouver.
wpDiscuz
