
Council debates balancing tradition and inclusivity in meeting practices
This week’s poll question asks whether the invocation should remain a part of Clark County Council meetings. Newly elected Councilor Wil Fuentes has sparked a lively discussion by proposing its removal, arguing that it mixes religion with government business. While some view the invocation as a valued tradition, others believe it may not align with modern practices of inclusivity. The council is considering alternatives like land acknowledgments and moments of reflection. What do you think? Vote now and share your opinions to help shape this important discussion.
More info:
Newly elected Councilor Wil Fuentes says invocation should be removed from County Council meetings
Newly elected Clark County Councilor Wil Fuentes proposes removing the invocation from council meetings, sparking a debate on inclusivity and public input.
Read more
Also read:
- Opinion: A year in review of news stories from a former sports guyClark County Today reporter Paul Valencia reflects on his evolving role, revisiting major news, community debates, sports moments, and human-interest stories that shaped Clark County in 2025.
- Opinion: Ready for another pay decrease from the state? It happens Jan. 1Elizabeth New (Hovde) argues that Washington’s Paid Family and Medical Leave payroll tax increase will further reduce workers’ take-home pay beginning Jan. 1.
- Opinion: Justice for none – Court hands down a mandate without a dime to fund itNancy Churchill argues that a Washington Supreme Court ruling on public defense imposes costly mandates on local governments without providing funding to implement them.
- Letter: When headlines gaslight the publicVancouver resident Peter Bracchi argues that emotionally charged immigration headlines blur legal distinctions and mislead the public rather than inform it.
- Opinion: California’s unemployment debt crisis mirrors Washington’s Employment Security Department failuresMark Harmsworth compares California’s growing unemployment insurance debt with Washington’s Employment Security Department failures and argues both states must reform or risk continued economic harm.







