
As Vancouver residents prepare to elect new city leaders, many are questioning whether current officials are effectively addressing the city’s most pressing issues
In a recent Clark County Today opinion column, candidates running for Vancouver City Council shared what they believe are the city’s biggest challenges — from homelessness and housing costs to public safety and government transparency. While some praised the city’s progress and leadership, others argued that current policies aren’t delivering results for residents. As debates continue over priorities and performance at City Hall, this week’s poll asks: how confident are you in Vancouver’s current city leadership to tackle these challenges and guide the city forward?
More info:
Opinion: The biggest issue facing the city of Vancouver
Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance previews a series on Vancouver’s mayoral and city council candidates, highlighting their views on the most pressing issues ahead of th...
Read more
Also read:
- Opinion: Interstate Bridge replacement – the forever projectJoe Cortright argues the Interstate Bridge Replacement Project could bring tolling and traffic disruptions on I-5 through the mid-2040s.
- Opinion: Make your voice heard about the majority party’s state income tax proposalRep. John Ley outlines his opposition to Senate Bill 6346 and urges residents to participate in the February 24 public hearing before the House Finance Committee.
- Letter: County Council resolution ‘strong on rhetoric, weak on results’Peter Bracchi calls on the Clark County Council to withdraw its ICE-related resolution and replace it with a measurable public-safety plan.
- Opinion: A loss at the Supreme CourtLars Larson reacts to a Supreme Court decision limiting President Trump’s tariff authority and outlines his view of its economic impact.
- POLL: Should Fort Vancouver Regional Libraries prioritize stronger parental oversight for children’s access to materials?A packed meeting over changes to the Fort Vancouver Regional Libraries strategic plan has sparked debate over parental oversight and children’s access to materials.







