Donald Kimball believes closing the digital divide and providing more choice for consumers in the broadband space are laudable goals, and small to medium ISPs are essential in achieving them
Donald Kimball
Washington Policy Center
Just over a month ago, the FCC voted to reclassify the internet as a Title II utility, giving the FCC broad oversight and control over internet regulations. Among other justifications, FCC Chairwoman Rosenworcel has made claims about the benefits this will provide in expanding reliable internet access to all Americans. As I’ve written previously, that goal is better achieved without a heavy-handed regulatory framework. Unsurprisingly small and medium internet service providers agree.
ACA Connects, an advocacy group of more than 500 members of small to mid size companies in the networking space, has strongly opposed the move. Even as Chairwoman Rosenworcel claims this shift will protect consumers and expand choice, the very companies that can disrupt monopolistic markets disagree:
“These sweeping mandates will add unnecessary ‘friction’ to our Members’ business decisions, at a time when they are working to expand connectivity and help close the digital divide. As one of my Member company executives told me in a conversation earlier this week, ‘Every dollar we spend on regulatory compliance is a dollar we don’t invest in our networks.”
The larger players in this space have the bandwidth to research into regulatory compliance and make the changes, but smaller, leaner companies do not have this luxury. By the very nature of heavier scrutiny and complicated rules, the FCC is creating an atmosphere hostile to small companies challenging the market dominance of major ISPs in an area. This necessarily leaves certain regions with as few as one choice for internet service providers.
What about the enforcement of net neutrality? The FCC offers consumer protection as another major reason for tightening their regulatory grip on the industry, but ACA Connects and its members provide the straightforward response: small companies have fewer resources to compete with larger players, which makes their focus on good pricing and excellent service a top priority. This, of course, is how free markets operate best. Direct accountability to customers and lean models that small businesses can offer make up what larger entities have in resources. In attempting to regulate good outcomes, small businesses get squashed in the process of verifying what they were already doing.
Closing the digital divide and providing more choice for consumers in the broadband space are laudable goals, and small to medium ISPs are essential in achieving them. Title II reclassification and mandating net neutrality will be a painful thorn in the side of those seeking to give consumers choice.
Donald Kimball is the communications manager and tech exchange editor at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- Opinion: A year in review of news stories from a former sports guy
Clark County Today reporter Paul Valencia reflects on his evolving role, revisiting major news, community debates, sports moments, and human-interest stories that shaped Clark County in 2025. - Opinion: Ready for another pay decrease from the state? It happens Jan. 1
Elizabeth New (Hovde) argues that Washington’s Paid Family and Medical Leave payroll tax increase will further reduce workers’ take-home pay beginning Jan. 1. - Opinion: Justice for none – Court hands down a mandate without a dime to fund it
Nancy Churchill argues that a Washington Supreme Court ruling on public defense imposes costly mandates on local governments without providing funding to implement them. - Letter: When headlines gaslight the public
Vancouver resident Peter Bracchi argues that emotionally charged immigration headlines blur legal distinctions and mislead the public rather than inform it. - Opinion: California’s unemployment debt crisis mirrors Washington’s Employment Security Department failures
Mark Harmsworth compares California’s growing unemployment insurance debt with Washington’s Employment Security Department failures and argues both states must reform or risk continued economic harm.
