Amy Harris believes city of Vancouver officials owe residents an explanation why this contract was awarded
Amy Harris
Clark County Matters
The past two years, we’ve repeatedly warned that Vancouver doesn’t have to end up like Portland, losing quality of life to homelessness and lawlessness. The policy failures of our neighbor across the river, actually provide a real-life laboratory for what policy makers in Vancouver and Clark County should AVOID doing.
Clark County Matters
But instead of learning from the mistakes of Portland, Vancouver city officials are committed to repeating them. Before I share more details, consider these three tragic facts of the Portland homeless record as reported by ProPublica on June 11:
- $1.3 BILLION
Portland allocated $1.3 Billion from 2021 to 2024 to “reprioritize public health and safety among homeless Portlanders.” - $200,000
Over that time, the city spent roughly $200,000 per homeless resident. - 450+
Yet deaths quadrupled, climbing from 113 deaths in 2019 to more than 450 in 2023.
Earlier this year, the city of Vancouver awarded a contract to Do Good Multnomah to operate a new homeless shelter. On paper, the organization may sound appealing, it promotes a low-barrier, housing-first approach and has partnered with neighboring Multnomah County. But there’s a serious problem: Do Good Multnomah has a documented track record of failure.
You’ve probably never heard any of this because our local media outlet — The Columbian — is more interested in protecting the failing status quo than asking tough questions about the massive increases in public funding going into local homeless programs and providers while the problem continues to grow worse.
Consider just one example: Sandy Studios, a supportive housing site the organization managed in Portland. A 2023 audit from Multnomah County revealed alarming mismanagement, lack of oversight, and unsafe living conditions that culminated in a ceiling collapse.
Do Good Multnomah subcontracted building maintenance to Home First Development — a firm with no property maintenance experience — without a competitive process or formal approval. What followed was neglect and decay. The site suffered from faulty wiring, broken plumbing, mold, inaccessible wheelchair ramps, and even a hole in the basement floor. Staff described the building as “moldering into the ground.” Meanwhile, tenants were allowed to deny access to maintenance crews, even when serious repairs were needed.
Despite obvious problems, the Joint Office of Homeless Services (JOHS) failed to inspect the site or intervene. Rent payments continued. Quarterly reports from Do Good were vague, repetitive, and omitted major safety concerns. No action was taken until a ceiling finally collapsed in 2021.
The auditor’s conclusion was clear: there were failures at every level. The report recommended stronger contract enforcement, clearer oversight roles, and improved compliance tracking.
Given this record of failure, why would the city of Vancouver hire Do Good Multnomah? That’s a question the City Council needs to answer.
The most generous explanation might be that city leaders didn’t fully investigate Do Good’s record. But these weren’t isolated missteps — they were systemic, well-documented failures. Vancouver’s leadership should have known.
It’s possible the city chose Do Good because its housing-first, low-barrier philosophy aligns with prevailing political priorities. But values are not enough. Effectiveness matters. Accountability matters. In fact, it matters most, especially when lives and public safety are on the line.
Vancouver residents have been clear: they want action on public camping and homelessness. They want real results, not ideological spouts that leave neighborhoods at risk and people on the streets. Choosing a provider with a failed track record sends the wrong message.
We all want solutions rooted in compassion. But compassion without competence doesn’t help anyone. Good intentions alone can’t solve complex problems. True progress requires not only empathy for those in need but also the expertise, accountability, and effective management to deliver real, sustainable solutions. Without that balance, efforts risk falling short, leaving vulnerable people underserved and communities frustrated.
Vancouver had the opportunity to choose a different path. Instead, we’re risking the same costly mistakes that have plagued Portland for years. City officials owe residents an explanation why this contract was awarded, and what steps they’re taking to ensure Vancouver doesn’t repeat the same failures Multnomah County is still trying to fix.
Also read:
- Letter: Charter Review Commission town hall set for Battle Ground Sunday
Fifteen elected commissioners are gathering public input before an Aug. 4 submission deadline for November ballot amendments. - Opinion: Democrats’ broken promises
Washington’s CCA has added 47 cents per gallon to gas prices, far beyond the “pennies” promised in 2021. - Letter: Buyer beware (caveat emptor)
Bob Ortblad argues the IBR recycled a $200M bridge design while spending $30M on public relations. - Opinion: John Dickinson and the case against Independence
John Dickinson warned that declaring independence prematurely would be to “brave the Storm in a Skiff made of Paper.” - Opinion: Comparing destruction vs refurbishment of the Interstate Bridges
Rep. John Ley argues $390M earmarked for bridge demolition could fund a seismic retrofit and new express span instead.
wpDiscuz
