
Liv Finne says school choice has one goal: to put the learning needs of children over the career desires of adults
Liv Finne
Washington Policy Center
Last week at WPC’s Gala Awards Dinner one of the nearly 1,000 attendees approached me and asked, “Liv, just what is school choice? Won’t it hurt public schools? Are other states using school choice?” These are reasonable questions. I will answer the first one first and tackle the other questions in future blog posts.

School choice is a policy idea for improving children’s access to education. It is entirely voluntary and provides parents with an alternative to a traditional government-run school.
The traditional system gives families little control and provides a “one-size-fits-all” model based on a child’s home address. Many parents like their local public school, but some communities are underserved.
Of course, school choice already exists for people who can afford it. It is called the real estate market. Wealthy families can buy homes in neighborhoods with good schools. Families unable to afford this often find their assigned public school fails to adequately educate students. School choice is the solution to this unfair situation. School choice gives parents their child’s education money directly, usually in the form of a regulated Education Saving Account (ESA), which allows the child access to an alternative school if parents think that is best.
These days, however, even parents in upscale neighborhoods are finding that school administrators often disrespect their religious beliefs and moral values. This creates tension between the political messages children hear at school and the character lessons parents are teaching at home.
School choice expands learning options by giving families control over their child’s public education dollars. Options make learning more inclusive. Educational choices can include private schools, homeschooling, online learning, individual tutors, and special needs services.
The courts have made it clear that because parents direct the spending, choosing a religious school is constitutional, in the same way that federal student aid now goes to religious-based colleges.
School choice programs vary in structure. Some programs give tax credits to organizations that fund scholarships to private schools. Some state programs provide vouchers or a tax-funded ESA.
In other states school choice programs typically provide families with between $4,300 and $8,400 per student per year. Special needs children receive additional public funding, up to $25,000. School choice programs are state-regulated, and all participating schools must be fully accredited.
School choice is popular. Already this year seven states have enacted universal school choice, allowing all students to participate. In all, thirty-two states, Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia offer some form of educational choice to parents.
Of course, there will always be those who are uncomfortable with change. The hardliners in the current system are particularly vocal, seeing parent choice as a threat to their budgets and careers. But the purpose of public education spending is to educate children, not to serve the financial desires of powerful interests.
School choice has one goal: to put the learning needs of children over the career desires of adults.
Liv Finne is the director of the Center for Education at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- Opinion: ‘A more responsible approach must be sought’Ken Vance argues a $10 billion funding gap makes the phased I-5 Bridge approach fiscally reckless, not responsible.
- POLL: Do patriotic displays like Yacolt’s road striping help strengthen community spirit?A Yacolt road striping project tied to America’s 250th anniversary is dividing opinion in Clark County.
- Opinion: The challenges of getting the Brockmann mental health facility openA $42 million, 48-bed mental health campus near WSU Vancouver was completed in 2025 but never opened due to lack of state funding.
- Opinion: Washington’s business exodus accelerates due to high taxes, regulations driving companies awayWashington’s business relocation rate has nearly tripled since winter 2025, per an AWB survey.
- Letter: Food service, public health, and the Men’s Share House questionPeter Bracchi asks why Share House’s 96,987 annual meals face less public-health scrutiny than a waterfront restaurant.







