Opinion: We should be questioning the global suppression of early treatment options for COVID-19

Clark County Today Administrator Heidi Wetzler shares what she believes is a medical tragedy that COVID-19 patients are not being treated immediately.

Clark County Today Administrator Heidi Wetzler shares what she believes is a medical tragedy that COVID-19 patients are not being treated immediately

If you walked into your doctor’s office with a case of shingles, what do you think would happen? Would you be sent home and instructed to return when the pain was unbearable – or would you be treated on the spot?  While there is no cure for shingles, prompt treatment with prescription antiviral drugs can speed healing and reduce the risk of complications. 

Heidi Wetzler, administrator, ClarkCountyToday.com
Heidi Wetzler, administrator, ClarkCountyToday.com

What about viral pneumonia, viral hepatitis, or HIV/Aids? Same question. Would you be treated? The answer of course, is yes. These all have treatment protocols, to speed recovery and increase comfort, even though viruses don’t necessarily have “cures.”  Because viruses don’t respond to antibiotics, alternative treatments are important. And they all work best when started early.  So why do we have a fatal viral infection ravaging the world, with barely a mention of ambulatory treatment?

Millions of people have tested positive for COVID-19,  and are promptly sent home to quarantine and self-monitor their symptoms. No health care professional checks in on them. They are told to stay home and only come back if they are having trouble breathing. While I would imagine it is common knowledge in the medical community that early treatment for any ailment greatly improves the chance of a favorable outcome, why is there a virtual blackout of information surrounding the global conversation of early treatment protocol in order to AVOID hospitalization and death? Controlling the healthy with masks and social distancing and now vaccines, and then Herculean efforts involving the critically ill, have taken up all of the air, while the person in their first two weeks of the infection suffering at home is all but ignored by the medical community. 

Dr. Peter McCullough, vice chief of Internal Medicine at Baylor University Medical Center in Dallas, Texas, and the most prolifically published academic physician in his field of heart and kidneys in history, has testified several times lately that there is a shocking suppression of early treatment for COVID-19 in medical literature. A review of several of his communications resulted in this summary of his findings. He calls this effort to suppress any hope of treatment, extraordinary. All of the patients he sees are considered high risk, and with the sequenced multi-drug approach he uses, he has only lost two. When he extrapolates the data he has personally acquired through treating his own very ill patients, and calculates what that would mean for the death rate worldwide if a similar treatment protocol was adopted globally, an astonishing 85 percent of COVID-19 deaths could have been prevented. The key is that treatment must begin early in order to avoid hospitalization. And that is the opposite of what has happened and is continuing to happen.  

The treatment regimen includes 4-6 drugs taken in a specific time frame, starting with monoclonal antibodies, then antivirals, then anti-inflammatories, and then anticoagulants. It is recommended that anyone over 50 with at least one comorbidity begin this course of treatment immediately. Reduction of viral replication at the forefront of infection is key. There has been unconventional concern worldwide regarding the safety of certain therapeutics for this virus. In fact, in Australia doctors were threatened with a 6-month prison sentence if they dared to prescribe the antiviral, Hydroxychloroquine. This move is unprecedented. The use of Hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 is off-label they said. But off-label use of older medicines for new uses occurs every day. In fact, 20 percent of all prescriptions in the U.S. are written for off-label uses when a doctor thinks a medicine will benefit a patient. Apparently, the list of what not to use is long and broad within the treatment recommendations. We are 16 months into this thing and as-of-yet, there are zero trials of multidrug therapies. There is no national or global panel of doctors in charge of early treatment protocol. Why? Maybe it’s because a vaccine is only allowed to be produced if there are no effective treatments.  

The conversation around building up one’s own immune system is also nearly nonexistent in medical and mainstream circles. A study conducted from March-June 2020 including 191,000 patients in the US found that Vitamin D deficiency increased the risk of acquiring COVID-19 by 54.5 percent. Additionally, 80 percent of people with COVID-19 didn’t have adequate levels of the vitamin in their blood. This is a wildly important piece of information that doctors should be shouting from the rooftops. Zinc is also critical as it helps block the virus from multiplying. An Adult Treatment Guide put out by Yale University cites “a lack of clinical data to support” the effectiveness of various vitamins and medicines. It is high time for the medical community to be implementing trials of all kinds and gathering such data. But the sole focus today seems to be on a one-size-fits-all vaccination campaign, instead of on strengthening one’s immune system and finding effective treatments. All of the eggs in the proverbial COVID-19 basket seem to be filled with only one treatment – the vaccine.  

Dr. McCullough testifies that there is no scientific rationale to vaccinate anyone under the age of 50. The individual risk outweighs the individual benefit. Also, there were several groups that were intentionally excluded from the Moderna, Pfizer, and Johnson & Johnson vaccine trials in 2020; COVID-19 recovered, suspected COVID-19 recovered, those with COVID-19 antibodies, pregnant women, and women of childbearing potential that couldn’t assure the use of contraceptives. Pregnant women as a rule of best medical practice are always discouraged from coming in contact with anything pathogenic. The COVID-19 vaccine produces a pathogenic protein. Why then, are pregnant women being given the shot? The existing scientific data simply does not ensure that it is safe for this group. My family is COVID-19 recovered. Why are we being encouraged to participate when our situation was not included in the clinical trial? Whether we want to believe it or not, COVID-19 recovered individuals are unknowingly signing up for a trial now if they receive the vaccine.  

Historically, those who contract and recover from a virus, have robust, complete and durable immunity. COVID-19 recovered, have actually been found to possess a terrific track record of freedom from reinfection. Moreover, SARS-coV-1, which emerged from China in 2002 is 79 percent similar to SARS-coV-2 (COVID-19), and most of those who contracted SARS-coV-1 still had immunity 17 years later. It is a false narrative at this point to suggest that there is significant concern that you can get it twice. While it is possible, it is now known that the chances are extremely low. On top of that those with natural immunity cannot acquire or spread it, as is a concern with those whose only immunity is from the vaccine. 

What we are witnessing now is tremendous coercion for everyone to receive this vaccine, no matter the individual risk/benefit analysis. This strategy is in direct opposition to The Nuremberg Code which doctors profess to uphold. The first tenet of this code begins as follows: 

1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. 

THE NUREMBERG CODE

Simply put, each person gets to decide what happens to their body. We are witnessing all manner of coercion regarding the distribution of this vaccine. Free donuts, lottery-style winnings, reduced prison sentences, and pressure from Hollywood stars. The weird and wild list goes on and on. Schools are offering vaccine clinics around the world, some without requiring the consent of parents. There simply is no significant evidence that children are at risk of spreading or becoming sick or dying from this virus. To me, these actions are nothing short of criminal. 

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons have put out a guide to Home-Based COVID treatment. A copy can be found here. There are 35 treatment centers in Texas for early treatment of COVID and if you need help finding one near you, there is a link to a list within this guide. As a society, we need to be questioning the radical suppression of early treatment options for a potentially fatal virus. It simply makes no logical sense. 

Receive comment notifications
Notify of
guest

281 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Nicole LaVoie
Nicole LaVoie
1 year ago

What a fantastic well informed written statement! Everyone should be reading this article.

Billy Dobbs
Billy Dobbs
1 year ago
Reply to  Nicole LaVoie

.you are absolutely 100% correct we need more like her that will stand up and speak the truth about all this stuff it’s getting ridiculous now they’re even wanting to pressure the military by threatening them to not get their pension if they refuse to be vaccinated that’s the craziest thing I have ever heard

Tom
Tom
9 months ago
Reply to  Billy Dobbs

Aren’t those supposed to take risks for their country anyways?

Liar Catcher
Liar Catcher
9 months ago
Reply to  Nicole LaVoie

Actually, it’s a very biased and inaccurate opinion piece. If this was fact it would be in the headlines. This is opinion and mostly wrong. Here’s one example: he said only two patients died and that extrapolates to a 85% survival rate. That means he only had 14 patients. That’s not a big enough group to base any on. Also, assuming they would all die without his treatment isn’t based on anything. High risk Covid patients don’t all die.

bink
bink
8 months ago
Reply to  Liar Catcher

It matches results in the more than 60 studies done. Uttar Pradesh State in India had a raging Delta outbreak, they stopped giving the vax to everyone, and gave ivermectin to all, and the death and hospitalizations went to almost zero. Japan had the same experience. The ‘health authorities’ and the mainstream media are controlled by the same monied interests, which is why this info is not in the headlines. It is not opinion, it is scientific fact, that goes against making billions on a vax that is worse than useless. If you took them, you will eventually figure this out.

David E Paul
David E Paul
8 months ago
Reply to  Liar Catcher

Dear Liar Catcher; Please reevaluate and do a deep drive into the published literature that is being suppressed (my opinion from experience in trying finding the literature) that reveals a very different aspect to this virus. Additionally what of all those individuals that have not received treatment or their treatment has been put on hold for non-Covid diseases? Fortunately these Brave Highly Credentialed Doctors, such as Dr. McCullough, Dr. Bhattacharya, Dr. Atlas, Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance and many others too numerous to list are at the forefront to stop this Mass Formation Psychosis.

bravefreedom
bravefreedom
26 days ago
Reply to  Liar Catcher

You are not a physician and yet you feel so comfortable criticizing a person who is a physician quoting another physician. You have no standing to be critical of anyone.

John Lifflander
1 year ago

Extremely good article. Never before have we seen this type of government intrusion into our lives and it will only get worse if we don’t speak out and even demonstrate if needed. This dangerous so called vaccine is being pushed on every one and someday, maybe years from now, we may have a lot of sick people from it and find it is much worse than Covid. The lies are appalling, Melnick, the County Health person, just said it is not experimental when FDA says it is. There is no end to the lying – reminds me of my visit to communist countries where everyone is afraid that may say something that might get them arrested.

Sylvie
Sylvie
1 year ago

On July 6, 1885, Louis Pasteur and his colleagues injected the first of 14 daily doses of rabbit spinal cord suspensionscontaining progressively inactivated rabies virus into 9-year-old Joseph Meister, who had been severely bitten by a rabid dog 2 days before. This was the first time the vaccine was injected to an human, the rest is history!

Joe
Joe
1 year ago
Reply to  Sylvie

Meaning? {Completly irrelevant as it was likely his only hope of survival}

Jen
Jen
1 year ago
Reply to  Joe

We are told this shot is our only hope of survival. Get it and you won’t likely die of Covid and we can take off the masks except that vaccinated people spread Covid and die of it sstill.65% of the deaths in Israel from delta are vaccinated. At least Pasteur saved his patient when doctors now days cannot even try until people are so sick they can barely breath, even when research is showing treatment works.

Marta
Marta
1 year ago
Reply to  Jen

What nonsense. We have not been told the vaccine is our only hope of survival. We’ve been told that most people survive Covid-19. We have been told that Covid-19 has long term consequences for a significant percentage of people. We’ve been told many people are at risk for severe disease, hospitalization or death which is demonstrated around the world on a daily basis, over 680,000 Americans have suffered and died alone and millions more around the world so far. We have been told that many survivors are left with debilitating and disabling consequences of this disease. We are back up to nearly 2 thousand Americans dying daily at this point. We’ve been told that historically vaccines end pandemics- examples -small pox, polio, whooping cough, diphtheria, measles etc. We’ve been told vaccination is the way to end this pandemic and put an end to the surging cases on Covid-19 that have wreaked havoc of our lives and on the lives of people around the world. We’ve been told that Scientific information on an evolving disease grows and changes as the disease replicates and mutates and that Science doesn’t have all the answers but the scientific community is working day and night to find answers, therapeutics and vaccines to keep up with the various emerging strains of SARS CoV2. And that is the truth.

Greg
Greg
1 year ago
Reply to  Marta

Thank you for posting this. I’m really struggling with an anti-vaxxer friend and she will not give any credence at all to any conventional media and it FREAKS me out ! How bizarre that so many people can completely dismiss the link between flooded hospitals with unvaccinated people and the fact that NONE of us personally know anybody with anything more than slight side effects from the vaccine.

Anzimee N Faubion
Anzimee N Faubion
11 months ago
Reply to  Greg

re you sure they are flooded with Covid patients? How many hospital patients really do have Covid?
How many were tested for Covid with the bogus PCR test? How many actually have seasonal flu?
How many patients are there because they have had moderate to severe reactions to a covid vaccine?
I have never known anyone who has had even a mild case of Covid 19, I personally have seen no evidence of Covid 19 being a real Pandemic. If it were a pandemic why would so many health care workers be losing their jobs? Why are there almost zero reports on the CDC website of seasonal Flu?
Too many questions, too many lies, too much censorship to make me a believer.

Liar Catcher
Liar Catcher
9 months ago

You not knowing anyone who got Covid means nothing. Yes, nurses and doctors that refuse to take precautions to slow the spread of the virus are being fired. They are a risk to others. While it’s a bad time to lose staff, having misinformed and dangerous staff is worse.

bink
bink
8 months ago
Reply to  Liar Catcher

the same doctors and nurses worked the hospitals for a year before there was a vax. Your statement implies the only protection is a vax, when the Facts are that many of those professionals have natural immunity that is completely discounted.

S.D.
S.D.
8 months ago
Reply to  bink

Yes, and many of my colleagues died (hundreds of nurses). What a dumb statement. None have died due to the vax.

LAURA Ruotsalainen
LAURA Ruotsalainen
11 months ago
Reply to  Greg

I know MANY that have either died or are debilitated by the vaccine. Just because you do not know someone doesn’t mean it isn’t happening. Have you looked up the VAERS numbers? They are unbelievable and frightening! Thank God YOU are not a statistic of vaccine trauma. Many nurses are!!!

Liar Catcher
Liar Catcher
9 months ago

You do not know many people who died from the vaccine. That is false. Prove it.

bink
bink
8 months ago
Reply to  Liar Catcher

you put up posts here without footnote references

S.D.
S.D.
8 months ago

misinformation much? You’re more likely to get struck by lightning 3 times then die from this vaccine.

I’m a COVID frontline nurse and I don’t know a single nurse with “vaccine trauma” (whatever the hell that means) but I know many that have become sick and some have died from COVID.

Laura Ruotsalainen
Laura Ruotsalainen
8 months ago
Reply to  S.D.

SAME! And yes we have nurses with vaccine injury. Pay attention. Your ignorance is glaring. Shame on you for this

S.D.
S.D.
8 months ago

surrreeeee lady.

Pat Martin
Pat Martin
10 months ago
Reply to  Greg

Led by anti vaxx scammers and shady groups around the world.

Max Power
Max Power
9 months ago
Reply to  Greg

What should freak you out is the fact that they changed the definition of “vaccine” from “a product that confers immunity” to “a product that confers some protection from serious illness”. When you do that, you change the process by which vaccines normally end mass transmission of illness because each person vaccinated becomes immune, to a process that is essentially the same if everyone was unvaccinated in the first place, because you can still get sick and you can still transmit the virus at the same rate as the unvaccinated. Only now, you allegedly have “some protection” (you still may become seriously ill and die), therefore the virus may need to evolve if your “protection” makes it hard on the virus in the least bit. So you are actually the people who are causing it to mutate the most. And do you even know if the new definition “vaccine” protected you at all? Remember only 2% of unvaccinated people ever got seriously ill and died in the first place. So now you have taken an experimental vaccine that has a rather serious side effect list, ESPECIALLY in young people and frequently severe and permanent in young males (myocarditis and pericarditis) that only had less than a 2% chance of making you very ill in the first place. And oh, by the way, if the “vaccine” was SO SAFE and the side effects SO RARE (neither of which is true), why, praytell, did they ask the courts to allow them FIFTY FIVE YEARS before releasing their vaccine data? Because they are horrified of the data getting out to the masses, despite the fact that the government gave them 100% legal immunity. If their product was so safe and effective, why would they even need that? Anyway, you should go and look their first 500 pages up, because it got released. What’s in there isn’t good. You SHOULD be VERY SKEPTICAL of the mainstream media because I’ll bet they told you NONE of this. Look up the papers that are released, studies on efficacy, etc. The media is never going to report that stuff because some of the big media companies are owned by the same conglomerate as the drug companies. Now I’m going to be nice and get you started. Here are some of the pages that Pfizer fought so hard to prevent their release. https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf Remember, the negative data comes from the VAERS reporting system, but that can represent somewhere between 1/10th of side effects and 1/100th (or greater) of side effects, because they mostly don’t ever get reported, yes even when the vaccines cause death. Ask yourself why so many FIFA players have dropped dead or injured on the field after they were mass vaccinated. Ask yourself why the media pretends they can’t come up with a correlation and are calling it things like “Sudden Adult Death Syndrome” in men and “Broken Heart Syndrome” in women. Ask yourself what kind of evil organization would report an obvious vaccine/death correlation as a complete mystery.

Bruce
Bruce
9 months ago
Reply to  Max Power

The flu had vaccines under the old definition, and it similarly incompletely offers protection. The definition was outdated before covid and the pandemic spurred the definition change.

Petitto
Petitto
8 months ago
Reply to  Greg
  1. My co-worker is in the hospital with Guillain Barre Syndrome and doctors determined it was from her immunization. She is partially paralyzed and has had to retire from her job (causing a huge cut in pay).
  2. Friend received immunization and within 6 weeks started losing unbelievable amounts of hair- Not just globs in her hairbrush, but actual huge bald spot on top of her head. There were no pre-existing reasons for this to happen.
  3. TWO family members who are always “on top of their game” report constant fatigue, forgetfulness, and inability to concentrate. One is easily confused by basic directions.

While I respect everyone’s reasons for getting the vaccine or not, we can’t say that we don’t know anyone that has had negative reactions.

Last edited 8 months ago by Petitto
Born in Washington
Born in Washington
7 months ago
Reply to  Greg

Did you escape from California or Oregon. They want you back

Beebop
Beebop
10 months ago
Reply to  Marta

Oh here we go with the “polio” example. The polio pandemic was caused by pesticides and if you don’t accept this, you are in denial. It shouldn’t be used as the end all example because it was a lie.

Liar Catcher
Liar Catcher
9 months ago
Reply to  Beebop

Polio is a virus. That’s been proven over 100 years ago and many times since.

Born in Washington
Born in Washington
7 months ago
Reply to  Liar Catcher

Bill Gates has successfully introduced polio with his vaxx into countries that had NEVER had a case of polio in their history. Also from the polio vaxxs from around 1960’s they have linked present day cancer DNA to those vaxx’s because the monkey’s had cancer. Y

Max Power
Max Power
9 months ago
Reply to  Marta

“We’ve been told that historically vaccines end pandemics- examples -small pox, polio, whooping cough, diphtheria, measles etc.” YES, but THOSE vaccines conferred IMMUNITY. The CDC just changed the definition of “vaccine” from “a product that confers immunity”, to “a product that confers “some protection from serious illness”. So, for any of those PREVIOUS outbreaks, you could reliably break the infection chain because you were conferring mass IMMUNITY on the population.
Using the SARS/COVID-19 NEW DEFINITION “vaccine”, YOU ARE NOT CONFERRING IMMUNITY ON ANYONE AT ALL!!! Hence, “what we’ve been told about “immunized” people BEING JUST AS CONTAGIOUS. And currently 65% of the people dying in Israeli hospitals FROM COVID are “immunized”! So the “vaccine” DOES NOT CONFER IMMUNITY, DOES NOT PREVENT OR EVEN LOWER TRANSMISSION RATES, AND DOES NOT PREVENT DEATH, and if you take the Israeli data into account, IT MAY NOT EVEN REDUCE THE DEATH RATE!
USE YOUR BRAIN! STOP REPEATING PROPAGANDA! IF THE “vaccine” WORKED TO CONFER IMMUNITY, SPREAD WOULD HAVE STOPPED AFTER THE VAST MAJORITY OF PEOPLE WERE “vaccinated”! There will not be a stop to the spread even after 95% are “vaccinated” because again, the “vaccine” DOES NOT CONFER IMMUNITY!!!
You appear to have the ability to learn and absorb concepts because you were able to repeat how infection chains are broken when people receive vaccines that confer immunity. Now you need to think your way through that chain after you have changed the word “vaccine” from having the definition “product that confers immunity” to “product that confers some protection from serious illness”.
Everything I have written here is 100% backed by scientific data. The CDC DID change that definition because the “vaccine” does not confer immunity. The CDC and the drug companies have reported that the “vaccine” does not make you less transmissible. The CDC and the drug companies admit that you may still die from COVID after you are “vaccinated”, even within 6 months of your booster. And the Israeli data indicates that MORE people are actually dying there vaccinated than not vaccinated! You are also causing mutations as much or more than the unvaccinated, because you can still carry and transmit the virus at the same rate as the unvaccinated!
YOU’VE BEEN HAD! YET YOU ARE STILL BLAMING THE VACCINE HESITANT FOR THE DISASTER THAT HAS RESULTED FROM THE CDC, FDA, AND DRUG COMPANIES ISSUING A “VACCINE” THAT DOES NOT FIT THE VACCINE DEFINITION FROM ALL OF HISTORY AND THEREFORE DOES NOT WORK TO BREAK INFECTION CHAINS OR TO END PANDEMICS LIKE VACCINES DID IN HISTORY!!!
You can “vaccinate” everyone on Earth with this product and it will not end mass sickness for COVID-19. So stop blaming the unvaccinated and blame your government and the drug companies. Everything I have stated about the “vaccine” is true and admitted to by the government and the drug companies, because they published those facts first and I am simply repeating what they have said. Everything I said about how the “vaccine” cannot ever possibly work to end mass infection is also true, because the process by which vaccines usually end mass infection DEPENDS on the definition of “vaccine” being “a product that confers immunity” and thus prevents infection, mutation and transmission in vast numbers of the population. This “vaccine” that doesn’t have that definition CAN NEVER EVER EVER achieve that!!!

Bruce
Bruce
9 months ago
Reply to  Marta

Well said.

Rick Stonebranch
Rick Stonebranch
9 months ago
Reply to  Marta

Good for you Marta! I am sick of these uninformed, non technical people whining about vaccinations and trying to turn public health into a political issue, which it most certainly is not and should never be.

Jhs
Jhs
9 months ago
Reply to  Marta

Vaccines end pandemics when they confer sterilizing immunity. These vaccines, as the director of the CDC has stated repeatedly, cannot do that. Thus they offer reduction in severe symptoms and to death to individuals who were previously at high risk, but they do not grant her an immunity or end or even significantly reduce circulating rates of virus.

Your understanding of the facts is a little amiss. If you look at the trend of infectious disease across the entire 20th century, and not just the post vaccine era, it’s clear that vaccines contributed only the very tail end to the plummeting rates that began just before World War II, thanks to dramatically improved public and private hygiene, sanitation, antiseptics, and antibiotics. This can be seen even more clearly when one compares the infection curves of vaccine preventable diseases to those of diseases for which we still don’t have vaccines, including scarlet fever and typhus.

Concerned Citizen
Concerned Citizen
8 months ago
Reply to  Marta

The truth.. Part of it maybe, but the early treatment before hospitalisation would have save many of those from being hospitalised and/or dying. Where is that factored in? Its not, its being actively suppressed. And the vaccine didnt stop these deaths and hospitalisations did it? Its only 1% effective and has many extreme side effects including death. Its not the only way but its the only treatment that is being talked about as safe. Thats is NOT THE TRUTH!

Roget
Roget
9 months ago
Reply to  Jen

I think you misread your facts about Israel vaccinated vs covid. If you regularly read misinterpreted news vs actual news, you are being manipulated. https://us06web.zoom.us/j/8173144101?pwd=ZTk2MlhsbHcxcEFHRWlmQUhPemp2QT09

Liar Catcher
Liar Catcher
9 months ago
Reply to  Jen

No one said that. Yes, of course when nearly 100% of your population is vaccinated, most of the cases in the hospital and deaths will be vaccinated people. If more were unvaccinated there would be way more deaths.

Pat Martin
Pat Martin
10 months ago
Reply to  Joe

Irrelevant how?

lesley dawn rabsch
lesley dawn rabsch
1 year ago
Reply to  Sylvie

Look up Pasteur, not all sunshine and roses,,Take off those rose coloured glasses.

Annabel
Annabel
1 year ago
Reply to  Sylvie

That was using the inactivated virus. The vaccine for covid has been linked to blood clots and in many cases death.

Diana
Diana
1 year ago
Reply to  Annabel

First of all, that 9 year old boy didn’t get injected with a genetically modified protein ……Secondly this is the very first MRNA VACCINE TO EVER be given. Thirdly, Dr. Malone, who invented and owns the patent on this mRNA tech is even saying the CDC isn’t telling us everything and that he is opposed to mandating the vaccine and there I’m there is still too little data. So the rabbit vaccine story is nice but not comparable.

Ken
Ken
1 year ago
Reply to  Diana

Diana…you are right about Dr. Robert Malone. I heard him say in one of his interviews that he “has concerns about the vaccines”. He said there are many serious side effects cases that are not being reported in the media, so people are getting a one-sided story about the vaccines. He also said the vaccines are experimental. He recommended the vaccine for the elderly, but not for younger people. He said many cases of inflammation of the heart have been reported in college-aged people. One of my close friends has been disabled since she got the vaccine in February when it was required by her employer. Sadly, Dr. Malone’s interviews and statements are heavily censored on social media and elsewhere. That should tell us something!

Twise
Twise
1 year ago
Reply to  Ken
S.D.
S.D.
8 months ago
Reply to  Diana

He didn’t invent mRNA technology. Many people did, over many years.

Lynn
Lynn
1 year ago
Reply to  Annabel

Not many in the scheme of things. Death is a potential side effect of many medications!

Gromit07
Gromit07
1 year ago
Reply to  Sylvie

Unfortunately, even the creators of the mRNA protocol don’t call it a vaccine….. what we have now is gene therapy, not a vaccine and the method of testing with the qPCR test is also being over amplified and as such, produces tons of false positives or cases….. stop testing people that are asymptomatic and the cases will drop.

The real reason IMHO that the medical establishment is against alternative medical treatment is there no money to be made…Why prescribe Ivermectin at $2.00 a pop whe. You ha e an $1500 vaccine?. The medical profession is funded by Big Pharma….but mark my words ….Pfizer and Merck will come up with their own cocktail of early treatment Meds …. Then and only then will the medical profession adopt alternatives to the vaccine.

Last edited 1 year ago by Gromit07
Diana
Diana
1 year ago
Reply to  Gromit07

100% agreed, money and power! They don’t care about the number
of deaths… you think they care about my patients dying from cancer. When I have them a prescription I have to give a dang coupon card. And they still have thousand of dollars of co pays even if they carry a primary and a secondary insurance. They don’t care about the people. It’s supply and demand which = more profit

R.J.
R.J.
1 year ago
Reply to  Gromit07

Where did you get the dollar amount figures for Ivermectin and $1500 for the vacine?

Christa Fischer
Christa Fischer
1 year ago
Reply to  R.J.

I have bought it and the amount stated is approximately right.

Twise
Twise
1 year ago
Reply to  Gromit07

While I agree with your sentiment, there are currently no clinical studies that prove ivermectin is effective in treating Covid-19. And now, people are actually harming themselves, some have even died, from overdosing on it.

Eric Walked
Eric Walked
1 year ago
Reply to  Twise

People are dumb , immunologist are not, and many are using it with great success.

Milly
Milly
1 year ago
Reply to  Twise

Story was a lie, put out by a locum doctor that hadn’t work at the hospital in months. In fact the hospital issued a statement saying they had not, or ever treated “horse wormer” overdoses and that no critical patientswere waiting or being prevented from receiving care.

Cynthia Bertelson
Cynthia Bertelson
1 year ago
Reply to  Twise

Not true. The overdose story was retracted. It seems to be working pretty well and if started early on works really well.

Sara
Sara
1 year ago
Reply to  Twise

You are so pathetic in your pathetic statements- trying to discredit dr Malone and early treatment. What maddens!! To send people home until their symptoms worsen and to deny them treatment that actually works , because it’s ‘of label’ is criminal. Do you understand? It is CRIMINAL!!! Hope you are all brought to justice. All of you promoting such practices have blood on your hands.

Pat Martin
Pat Martin
10 months ago
Reply to  Sara

Do you understand that the early treatments have not passed muster for RCT at .05 level of probability.

Mark
Mark
1 year ago
Reply to  Twise

I’ve used it. I was treated with it last month. It worked great. My brother was untreated and went to the ICU for 5 nights. I took Ivermectin and Azithromycin and symptoms subsided after the 3rd day of treatment. It works!!

Max Power
Max Power
9 months ago
Reply to  Twise

TWO HUNDRED FIFTY CONGRESSMEN TOOK THE IVERMCTIN COCKTAIL BECAUSE IT WORKS AND THEY WANT TO SURVIVE UNLIKE THE PLEBEANS. Hollywood takes the Ivermectin cocktail. No study will undertake the Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine treatment together properly with their cocktail drugs and apply them early in the infection process, which is where they work due to viral replicase interruption because that will put their “vaccine” scam out of business. And this pandemic literally saved one or two drug companies, whom various CDC and FDA personnel will now go onto head after they leave their government jobs. So everyone involved has every incentive to prevent honest studies of the early treatment cocktails, which they have indeed purposefully tested incorrectly. But we have SEVERAL doctors of note who took over 500 patients of high risk due to ill health and old age, treated them with one or the other cocktail, and each lost from zero to two patients. That’s a good enough study substitute for me (and for Congress). Meanwhile the corrupt studies only dosed the single drug by itself after people were already on ventilators and about to die, at which point their lungs were too damaged and the infection already spread throughout the tissue. Well the viral replicase interrupters can’t interrupt spread and thus be effective if the virus has already spread everywhere. That is exactly how they conducted those studies, because I read them myself, having a proper understanding of how the drugs were supposed to work. Anyone who understands the science who read those “studies” thought the same thing I did, “bullsh*t”.

Born in Washington
Born in Washington
7 months ago
Reply to  Twise

You are so uninformed you are a part of the problem not the solution.

bravefreedom
bravefreedom
26 days ago
Reply to  Twise

Ivermectin is one of THE most safest drugs on the planet having been prescribed over 3 billion times and being a noble prize winning drug. Where do you get these lies?

S.D.
S.D.
8 months ago
Reply to  Gromit07

“Why prescribe ivermectin”
-Because it doesn’t work, and shows no promise in current trials.

”stop testing people that are asymptomatic and cases will drop”
-people are not getting a stick up their nose and down their throats for funzies. If you look at the positivity rate, it’s obvious when there is a surge. It’s also obvious to me, since I care for the unvaccinated everyday in critical care and we don’t have beds available for your grandma with a heart attack.

Cynthia Bertelson
Cynthia Bertelson
1 year ago
Reply to  Sylvie

Your point is off subject of what we are being subjected too. COERCION is not right and c-19 is NOT an automatic death sentence.

Max Power
Max Power
9 months ago

Yeah, less than 2% die! But these people who don’t die of vaccine induced clots or heart attacks of course give their “vaccine” which does not confer immunity, prevent infection, or prevent transmission, that had to have the definition of “vaccine” changed to qualify it, 100% credit to their survival of COVID. LOL!!!

S.D.
S.D.
8 months ago
Reply to  Max Power

What are you talking about. There has been 3 deaths confirmed linked to the vaccine. 1 million (by next month) COVID deaths.

Jhs
Jhs
9 months ago
Reply to  Sylvie

Post-infection treatment is a therapeutic, not a vaccine.

Liar Catcher
Liar Catcher
9 months ago

No, it is an incredibly biased and inaccurate article. Just because it aligns with your bias doesn’t make it good. So, he had 2 patients die. Then extrapolates that to a 85% survival rate. That means he only had like 14 patients. That’s not a big enough group to even consider basing anything on except maybe the need to do an actual valid test. Many more examples of bad science…

Amanda Blake
Amanda Blake
7 months ago

When you lose 8 or 10 loved ones who believed your shit, maybe you will start educating yourself on science rather than political BS.

Jamie Bradshaw
Jamie Bradshaw
1 year ago

Great article with well-thought out questions. I am sharing it with a long list of people who will find it encouraging and helpful.

Carol Crevier, RN MPH

Excellent reporting getting to the heart of the issues.

Sara
Sara
1 year ago

Absolutely spot on!!

Riekie Erasmus
Riekie Erasmus
1 year ago

Great article. I listened to the interview on vimeo. It is powerful, a bright light in the dark tunnel of deceit.

jmk
jmk
1 year ago

Dr. Peter McCullough, who seems to be a cardiologist, according to the linked report, was debunked many times. It’s irresponsible for this publication to be publishing anti-vaxx nonsense.

https://factcheck.afp.com/us-cardiologist-makes-false-claims-about-covid-19-vaccination

Charles Geraghty
Charles Geraghty
1 year ago
Reply to  jmk

Notice how the “Fact Checkers” never answer the question about how early treatment is saving so many lives. How can the official response still be to go home and wait to get worse and then do the same in hospital with the mantra of ‘wait for the vaccine’. One can only conclude that there is a forced vaccine agenda at play here that is at complete odds with the Nuremberg code. Perhaps they’re in the process of developing an even more virulent strain in the Wuhan labs to be accidently released with the only saviour being another vaccine?

Stacy Peacock
Stacy Peacock
1 year ago

IT’S ALL POLITICALLY MOTIVATED… GO AHEAD & DRINK THE KOOL-AID

Twise
Twise
1 year ago
Reply to  Stacy Peacock

Brilliant response 🙄.

Twise
Twise
1 year ago

Where are the credible clinical studies to support your theory, “Dr.” Geraghty?

Pat Martin
Pat Martin
10 months ago

Absurd and definitely xenophobic.

Max Power
Max Power
9 months ago

I think these accounts are bots or shills deployed or paid for by the drug companies or whoever else has an interest in mass vaccinating the population with a “vaccine” that does none of the things that vaccines were required to do by definition up until last year. Because the “vaccine” does not confer immunity, prevent illness, prevent transmission, or even prevent death, but DOES require virus mutation to make virus survival and spread easier, it would not matter if 100% of people on Earth get “vaccinated” because it will still infect and spread. So there is something deeply, deeply wrong here. The other scientists understand this just as well as I do. Yet they are pushing it anyway. And its not just about money or going to work for Pfizer after CDC and FDA, because there are only so many people who are gong to do that. No, there is something else going on. There is another reason why they are ALL pushing “vaccines” that aren’t vaccines, that by definition, can NEVER end the pandemic and are only making death rates slightly smaller. Why they are pushing it on age groups that absolutely do not need it and are killing far more young people from vax effects than would have died from the virus, like 300 times more. No one would do all of that without a reason.

Lumikki
Lumikki
8 months ago
Reply to  Max Power

reducing the world population as Bill Gates once said, I guess

Bruce
Bruce
9 months ago

Hahaha, are you sure that’s the ONLY conclusion? Ridiculous

Jon
Jon
1 year ago
Reply to  jmk

FYI re incorrect factcheck info about supposed asymptomatic transmission – a German study on the CDC’s web site found: “The fact that we did not detect any laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 transmission from asymptomatic case-patients is in line with multiple studies.”

Dave C.
Dave C.
1 year ago
Reply to  jmk

Nonsense.
Dr. Peter McCullough doesn’t “seem to be a cardiologist.” He is a highly-published professor of Internal Mediciane at Texas A&M Medical School and Vice Chief of Internal Medicine at Baylor University Medical Center. He wrote one of the FIRST medical journal articles on early treatment for Covid-19, when physicians were struggling to find some way to treat the deadly disease.
Link:
American Journal of Medicine “SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection”
https://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(20)30673-2/fulltext

I’d suggest readers listen to the full interview of Dr. McCullough (over an hour) where he discusses success with early treatments as well as vaccines. He is vaccinated, but says that pregnant/nursing women and children should NOT get the mRNA vaccines (Moderna & Pfizer) due to the growning number of reported side effects.

FULL INTERVIEW: Dr. Peter McCullough, MD MPHon Covid-19 treatments and vaccines.
https://rumble.com/vhp7y5-full-interview-world-renowned-doctor-blows-lid-off-of-covid-vaccine.html

His main point is that the suppression of early treatment of Covid-19 by those in government and the media is ridiculous and has never been seen with any other medical condition. There are several drugs, procedures, and nutraceuticals that practicing physicians have found to be effective if Covid-19 patients are treated early. These include:

Medications:
-Remdesivir
-Ivermectin
-Hydroxychloroquine (please don’t start with the anti-Trump nonsnense, the use of the drug it isn’t in question anymore)
-Azithromycin or Doxycyline
-Corticosteroids
-Ivermectin
-Famotidine

Procedures:
-Monoclonal antibodies (e.g. Regeneron)
-Convalescent plasma

Immune Supportive Nutraceuticals:
-Zinc (most important with the medications above)
-Vitamin C
-Vitamin D3
-Selenium

Vicky Tang
Vicky Tang
1 year ago
Reply to  Dave C.

He’d also mentioned Fluvoxamine which is an SSRI antidepressant and Colchicine which is a drug treatment for gout He’d mentioned that Colchicine is at least 50% effective in preventing someone from getting COVID-19 and I know for a fact that people with gout on Colchicine did not get sick during the pandemic while being around COVID-19 patients in close quarters for at least an hour multiple times a day due to their professions despite everyone else around them got COVID-19. This was before they had the mask mandates at the hospitals. I remember being threatened at the hospital for disciplinary action during the pandemic for wearing masks and now they’re threatening us again for not getting a dangerous vaccine. I have no problem getting Novavax but since the government knows it’s safe so they’re giving them a hard time by citing all kinds of standard violations and withholding the funding and raw materials so they can’t produce the vaccine or get it approved. Meanwhile India, Canada, and Europe are ordering millions of doses from them already. Please explain this!

Max Power
Max Power
9 months ago
Reply to  Vicky Tang

Just don’t take it. It’s not worth your health or your life.

Rick Stonebranch
Rick Stonebranch
9 months ago
Reply to  Vicky Tang

Colchicine is a dangerous poison, especially if administered indiscriminately. People need to be careful about these protocols.

Twise
Twise
1 year ago
Reply to  Dave C.

A personal and life-long friend who has a masters degree in Epidemiology, including viruses, from Johns Hopkins sent me this article when I inquired of Dr. McCullough. No offense intended, but I trust his expertise over your opinion on this matter. In addition, Dr. McCullough’s colleagues are wondering why he appears to have forgotten everything he ever learned in epidemiology and clinical medicine. Is it for the notoriety (hero worship status) and/or money?? Is he drinking heavily?? Senility? My friend thinks he should either be jailed for misleading the public or committed to an insane asylum (tongue in cheek humor of course)

https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/vaccines-are-a-safer-alternative-for-acquiring-immunity-compared-to-natural-infection-and-covid-19-survivors-benefit-from-getting-vaccinated-contrary-to-claims-by-peter-mccullough/

Max Power
Max Power
9 months ago
Reply to  Twise

Shill. Stop lying! Why would your fictional epidemiologist friend support the mass “vaccination” of a populace using a drug that does not fit the definition of “vaccine” from one year ago, and therefore, cannot ever, by definition, end the pandemic, because it does not confer immunity, does not prevent infection, does not prevent mutation, does not guarantee the prevention of serious illness or death, and would have great difficulty even quantifying any reduction of illness or death whatsoever? I hope your 5.00 a post was worth it.

S.D.
S.D.
8 months ago
Reply to  Max Power

This is all false. Except, “does not guarantee prevention of serious illness or death”… no one ever said it did.

S.D.
S.D.
8 months ago
Reply to  Twise

It’s $$. He’s making money off the right. He’s making a lot more than he was as a physician. Pretty smart but gross.

Max Power
Max Power
9 months ago
Reply to  Dave C.

Well said, well said. Meanwhile the “vaccine” does not confer immunity, does not prevent infection, does not prevent mutation, does not prevent transmission, does not guarantee the prevention of serious illness and does not guarantee the prevention of death. Heck, if you think about it, the “reduction” of serious illness or death, cannot even be verifiably quantified. But it is being administered to people who only 2 out of 100 were going to become seriously ill anyway, vaxxed or not. So the masses believe it works when they don’t get seriously ill. 98 believers out of every 100, right? And because the definition of “vaccine” had to be changed to qualify it for emergency usage, it cannot ever, by definition, ever stop the spread of this virus, Not ever, even with 100% vaccination. And they know this! That’s the crazy thing that tells me with 100% certainty that something else is going on.

S.D.
S.D.
8 months ago
Reply to  Max Power

Wrong-o bong-o again, Max.

S.D.
S.D.
8 months ago
Reply to  Dave C.

-He’s also debunked by heaps of research (on HCQ)…(and you are wrong…the evidence against HCQ is substantial at this point). Also, corticosteroids (solu-medrol) have more harm than good early in treatment. It is reserved for those who need oxygen and show pneumonia on CXR. Convalescent plasma is not in favor, research has shown no benefit, especially in the early stages.

-He’ is being sued by Baylor because he’s spreading misinformation under their name

-He’s has a restraining order against him from Baylor

-He’s making money off the right– he’s a crook. He saw an opportunity and now he’s making money off you.

-He took an oath to practice medicine based on the best evidence- but is ignoring that oath, causing harm

-The board of medicine is now threatening to take away his MD license

Paul King
Paul King
1 year ago
Reply to  jmk

I look forward to the day when branding tendentious propaganda as “fact checking” ceases to work. I’m not tempted to critique it in much detail, but the linked article begins by “debunking” the claim that “[h]ealthy people younger than 50 do not need a Covid-19 vaccine” without citing a shred of evidence that healthy people younger than 50 are at any significant risk from Covid-19. We are given an unsubstantiated quote from an authority figure alleging the obviousness that healthy people under 50 should be vaccinated “because they can still be affected by the disease”: in a sane world this could only possibly be “obvious” were the dangers of vaccination itself minimal, which in this instance they patently are not,. I could very easily go on, but it would be healthy for anyone still at all disposed to trust anything claiming to be a “fact checker” to check out the meretriciousness of this one for themselves.

Jo Anne Costello
1 year ago
Reply to  Paul King

Exactly!!!! How can anyone defend the act of risking the health of their children for an experimental vaccine? I’m not anti-vax, but the argument for making healthy people get Covid shots “IN CASE” they “MIGHT POSSIBLY” spread it to Granny is preposterous! I’m all for the sick, elderly & any other adults who want to get the vaccine to do so. But I cannot understand why our government refuses to include those who have recovered with antibodies. Not to mention that we will never reach herd immunity as long as we get over 100,000 foreign nationals every single month (from 150 different countries) added to our ‘herd’.

Twise
Twise
1 year ago
Reply to  Paul King

Text from a friend who has a master’s degree in Epidemiology, including viruses, from Johns Hopkins:

“Hey honey bunny – this Dr. McCullough WAS a fairly distinguished cardiologist, but lately he’s COMPLETELY lost his mind. My research suggests that he is likely doing it for several reasons, including the HUGE notoriety he has been getting on social media and on various recommended news outlets, claiming some sort of a “hero status” and personal worship among the far right wing. He is also getting a ton of money from appearances on television and the internet, from YouTube and other media sites for clicks, and from certain sponsors and the manufacturers of vitamins, supplements, ivermectin, remdesivir, and hydroxychloroquine. It could be that he is getting senile too, or maybe he’s drinking or getting high, but I can tell you one thing for sure … He is completely full of shit to the point where if he had blue eyes at one time, they are dark brown now, because he’s full of it all the way up to the top of his skull. The one thing was easiest to disprove that he says is treatment with hydroxychloroquine. There have been many clinical trials of hydroxychloroquine, with or without the similar drug chloroquine, azithromycin, and even placebo in the very early part of the pandemic. Now, of course, it is considered completely unethical to do a clinical trial for covid-19, which can cause death or lifelong great bodily harm, by using a placebo on the comparator arm. That would be like doing a cancer trial of a new drug and comparing it to saltwater injections for placebo. You just can’t do that, it’s basically manslaughter period. When you do a trial of a new cancer drug (side note from me – the author of this text has actually spent decades in a lab researching viruses that cause cancers) you don’t compare it to placebo, you compare it to the standard drug you use to treat that cancer, and see if there’s a difference in favor of the new drug. It’s kind of a weird case, you don’t often see this happen, that a very highly respected doctor with over 500 research papers published just forgets everything he ever learned in epidemiology and clinical medicine and starts spouting bullshit for money or notoriety. I believe the man should be jailed or put into a mental institution.😂

Right before I texted you today, I was reading a summary of an extensive study of vaccine risks versus virus caused risks in 29 million people, who were all over 40 and had had at least one injection of a vaccine, and compared them to 1.8 million people who had been infected with the virus. That’s one hellacious sample, obviously. It didn’t matter which vaccine, although the new mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna are dramatically more effective than all the other ones, which are made using older vaccine technology, like whole inactivated, or fragmented radiated or chemically treated SARS virus, or virus that has had certain proteins cloned into an adenovirus vector and given with or without an adjuvant to boost its potency. Some are like many other vaccines made today, including a few of the COVID vaccine types. THE STUDY WAS VERY CONSISTENT WHEN COMPARED ACROSS ALL STUDY GROUPS, and in all cases, the vaccines safety and effectiveness just absolutely blew away the results for people who were unvaccinated. All vaccines, no matter how they are made or for what disease they’re intended to prevent, carry some risks. That is absolutely unavoidable.

But for example, among every 10 million people who took the Astra Zeneca vaccine, there were 107 people who had a very low platelet count and got bad internal bleeding, or died of that bleeding, the risk of having the SAME problems from the COVID virus infection was over NINE TIMES AS HIGH. And while 66 out of 10 million vaccinated people got a serious blood clot or died of a blood clot, among 10 million people who got the virus, there were over 200 TIMES AS MANY who got a serious blood clot or died.

 Among the 10 million who got the Pfizer vaccine, like me, there were an extra 66 strokes, the rate from COVID 19TIMES as high from getting the virus. Among Pfizer vaccine recipients, like me, there
 was a very tiny increase in risk of having a stroke from getting the Pfizer vaccine, like I got – and by the way, I’m getting a third shot within the next couple of weeks.”

If your credentials outrank his, please tell me more. I’ll wait.

Sara
Sara
1 year ago
Reply to  Twise

Your “friend” is just as much as of an idiot as you are. It would be silly even to try to reason your nonsense. Conclusion of the scientific world we leave in nowadays is – “their Friends” matter but Dr Peter McCullough with an incredible record don’t!!! They truly think everyone in this world is to dumb. 😂 Fact checkers hey!! Just brilliant!

Sharon Cooke
Sharon Cooke
1 year ago
Reply to  Twise

IVM saves over 85% of ppl who take it early on. But Drs were directed to barely treat ppl and left them get sick at home with only zpak and maybe steroids and some eventually needed hospital and some died.. A disgrace of medical treatments, but the medical mafia caused it. The ppl know no matter what paid shills like you say.

S.D.
S.D.
8 months ago
Reply to  Sharon Cooke

Disgusting accusation. Completely baseless. There is absolutely no data that shows IVM “saves” lives.

You clearly have no medical education, it shows.

John E. Mussack
John E. Mussack
10 months ago
Reply to  Twise

Don’t Dr. McCullough’s credentials outrank his?

Max Power
Max Power
9 months ago
Reply to  Paul King

I know right? But according to their own admissions, the vaccinated can still be affected by the illness!!! Because as they admit, it does not confer immunity or prevent infection, or prevent serious illness! Lol, WTF man?

Jo Anne Costello
1 year ago
Reply to  jmk

Do you have any sort of medical or scientific background? Those of us who do, recognized that Fauci was lying early on. It’s outrageous that “fact checking” minions of social media think they know more than actual MD’s, nurses & researchers. I can’t even fathom how many lives could have been saved, had Covid not been politicized in such a manner. Hyper partisans use trigger words like “misinformation” & “disinformation”, even though they don’t have a clue about research or statistics.

Michal
Michal
1 year ago

How was Fauci lying early on?
I won’t ask the counter question, how was trump not lying because the man clearly had not one iota of scientific literacy in his body.

Free American
Free American
1 year ago
Reply to  Michal

To list the lies would take up to much space, so I’ll answer your question with a question, “how was Fauci NOT lying early on? And still doing so. Lab leak, mask, don’t mask, mask, vaccines, sarcastically, “covid vaccines are safe and effective” “safe and effective” “safe and effective” Bhaaaaaaa, Bhaaaaaaa. So safe and effective that they have to suppress the HUGE #’s of negative side-effects and deaths very soon after covid vax or months later. Oh and each negative side-effect or death just happens to be nearly the same, some adverse reaction with blood clots being the main root of the cause. Go take your covid vax, the fewer sheep like you left around, the easier it will be for us who love freedom to resist these globalist and take back our world and remain free.

Vicky Tang
Vicky Tang
1 year ago
Reply to  Free American

Well said!

Rick Stonebranch
Rick Stonebranch
9 months ago
Reply to  Free American

Crazy right wing ideas do not confer medical legitimacy on anyone, sorry.

Twise
Twise
1 year ago

Since the majority of medical doctors and researchers you speak of use words like “misinformation” in reference to Dr, McCullough’s blathering, what are you on about? Are the majority of doctors world-wide “hyper partisan” then? You need to adjust your conspiracy theory so it doesn’t so absurd.

Keep It Real
Keep It Real
1 year ago
Reply to  Twise

Talk to the hundreds of Covid Patients that were treated with Dr Peter McCullough protocols and successfully were cured of Covid (I know many of them)….when other people were sent home to get worse and then back in hospital to die.

John E. Mussack
John E. Mussack
10 months ago
Reply to  Twise

The majority of doctors may not be partisan, but they are human and conform when intimidated like anybody else.

S.D.
S.D.
8 months ago
Reply to  Twise

Agree. It’s bizarre. Millions of physicians worldwide but Dr. McCullough must be right! Because he fits their narrative.

clk
clk
1 year ago
Reply to  jmk

Thank you for posting this. There is also a article that debunks all he has said

https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/vaccines-are-a-safer-alternative-for-acquiring-immunity-compared-to-natural-infection-and-covid-19-survivors-benefit-from-getting-vaccinated-contrary-to-claims-by-peter-mccullough/

People need to hear truth. And I am so tired of people leveraging fear or their beliefs as a reason to not get a life saving measure. You hold the hand of 100s as they die alone as your in a hazmat suit and see how your opinion changes. Again thank you. C

Matthew Sirbaugh
Matthew Sirbaugh
1 year ago
Reply to  clk

Wrong

ticklemeelbow
ticklemeelbow
1 year ago
Reply to  clk

Because no author is associated with this article (unlike some of the others), here is the editor as stated at the bottom of the page, https://healthfeedback.org/editor/flora-teoh/. For the claims cited, the list of references is surprisingly short, and one of which has not been published/peer-reviewed. Since we can only establish authorship by the editor named, we can ask the obvious question; how many patients has she treated? Probably none since she is a PhD and makes no claim to medical practice. I would expect more information about her through her curriculum vitae which is missing from her biography.

The Health Feedback site links to another site called Science Feedback that links to Climate Feedback which is a French non-profit established in 2016 through an Indiegogo campaign (https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/climate-feedback-a-guide-to-reliable-climate-news–2/#/). They are partnered with Facebook (go figure) and financially supported by a short list of funders & donors (https://sciencefeedback.co/partners-funders-donors/).

As quoted on their site, “Science Feedback is paving the way for a new kind of fact-checking”. What does that mean exactly, is it scientifically objective (evidence-based) or ideologically subjective??? Their list of article reviews are repugnant in regard to thorough citation of scientific study and research before 2020, some of which have no citations at all.

This took me 20 minutes to figure out! Thank you, clk. Please try again.

Kevin
Kevin
1 year ago
Reply to  clk

Not sure that this debunks early treatment as the best possible treatment at all.

Debra Goda
Debra Goda
1 year ago
Reply to  jmk

I disagree. There is a lot more to the truth of this man-made in the lab virus. And there is treatment, many doctors will say they don’t treat COVID-19,WHY? There’s nothing said or offered to the public to be treated early covid patients with therapy drugs. What about early preventive care with diet and supplements. There’s many therapy drugs that have been affected in saving lives. Question, why is there so much push on getting the vaccine, vaccinating the globe?

Harriet Parsons
Harriet Parsons
1 year ago
Reply to  Debra Goda

US Government patent records show that the people behind our epidemic started patenting the virus & vaccines for the virus years ago:
https://robertdavidsteele.com/there-is-no-variant-not-novel-no-pandemic-dr-david-martin-with-reiner-fuellmich/

Twise
Twise
1 year ago

You are beyond helping. You’ve gone waaaay too far down the rabbit hole on this one, dear. smh

Sara
Sara
1 year ago

Fantastic work Harriet!! Thank you! It is all well documented. The cancer called unelected psychopaths of Schwab’s WEF criminal and corruption has spread into all spheres of people’s life. The system is rotten. Corrupt to the core. Needs changing and now is the time. The responsible ones need to rot in jail. All of them!

Twise
Twise
1 year ago
Reply to  Debra Goda

Because millions of people have died in this pandemic??? That could have something to do with why they want people to get vaccinated, but what do I know?

sdm
sdm
1 year ago
Reply to  jmk

Dr. Peter McCullough MD, MPH, Internist, Cardiologist, Epidemiologist, Professor of Medicine-Texas A&M College of Medicine, President -Cardio Renal Society of America, Editor & Chief -Cardio Renal Medicine Journal, Editor & Chief -Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, Senior Associate Editor of American Journal of Cardiology; Dr. McCullough considered among the world’s leading Experts on Covid 19, 46 Peer Reviewed Publications on Covid, &, Called to Testify by The United States Senate Committee Homeland Security & Gov Affairs 2020, Texas Senate Committee Health & Human Services 2021, Colorado General Assembly 2021, New Hampshire Senate 2021.

Above Re: Dr. Peter McCullough MD, MPH are facts aka Support evidence to prove,True. I will skip the No Name Attached->@debunk link. Thanks!

Michal
Michal
1 year ago
Reply to  jmk

I wonder when in the case of being personally faced with a serious illness like, say, cancer, these same folks would want someone who actually knew of the latest findings and studied cancer treating them, or someone far out of the field and an administrator whose ideas have been debunked??

Billy f
Billy f
1 year ago
Reply to  jmk

GFY

Achsel
Achsel
1 year ago
Reply to  jmk

Dr McCullough is a doctor and medical professor. He has certainly never been debunked whatever the hell that means. And he is not Anti-vax. He is pro treatment early and has his own patient data to back it up, along with now hundreds of studies proving the benefit of some of these drugs. It’s like people want the worst, the gloom and doom, the vaccine is the only answer. It’s not and hasn’t been since the beginning. We are literally killing people by withholding these treatments. That is not just irresponsible it is criminal!

Newms
Newms
1 year ago
Reply to  Achsel

The fact you do not know what debunked means is hilarious. So I cannot take what you say and believe any of it. Let me give you a simpler word or two.. disproven or discredited. Yes he has been debunked. 1) his take on thinking no one under 50 needs a vaccine well that’s NOT TRUE 2) no one who is asymptomatic can infect others well that is NOT TRUE either. That’s some main ones. It’s like the guy is forgetting everything he’s learned like what someone has already mentioned. These conspiracies about vaccines and covid are doing more harm than good.

Rick Ponto
Rick Ponto
11 months ago
Reply to  Newms

Even if you only wondered about 50 percent of what McCullough said, doesn’t that make you question what’s going on.
I don’t think this guy just fell on his head. I do think individuals like him offer us something to think about and question and not just blindly follow, media, politicians and big pharma.

John E. Mussack
John E. Mussack
10 months ago
Reply to  Newms

Newms, you do not know what conspiracy means.

Thankful Covid Recovered Patient
Reply to  jmk
  • Do your research before you discount and defame someone. Dr. Peter McCollough is a highly credentialed cardioligist/internist/epidemiologist who has testified before Senate hearings. He has a podcast, The McCollough Report, containing valuable information for early treatment that is saving lives. My family followed it, recovered with no hospitalizations or death. Our family physician said to simply stay home, let me know if you have trouble breathing and then I can prescribe an inhaler. We chose the early onset treatment by Dr. McCollough instead. It is criminal that physicians aren’t doing anything except telling people to stay home and aren’t providing early onset treatment. It’s much easier to control a brush fire than to wait until its a raging forest fire. People are dying needlessly because of the suppression of information and by discrediting doctors who are helping people. The “debunking”as you call it, is merely a rejection of truth by those who are promoting an agenda. “Stop the spread” should apply to those who discredit and defame people, spreading disinformation– that can cost lives. Wake up!
Lynn
Lynn
1 year ago

Well said. And yes!! Wake up! You’re being bamboozled by the top 1% of the wealthy in the world. They own all those large corporations, they own the mainstream media (follow the money) and they threaten scientists and doctors who want to tell the truth.

All the treatments being marketed as COVID-19 “vaccines”, are still in Phase III clinical trials until 2023 and hence, qualify as a medical experiment. People taking these treatments are enrolled as test-subjects and are further unaware that the injections are not actual vaccines as they do not contain a virus but instead an experimental gene therapy.

Numerous doctors, scientists, and medical experts are issuing dire warnings about the short and long-term effects of COVID-19 injections, including, but not limited to death, blood clots, infertility, miscarriages, Bell’s Palsy, cancer, inflammatory conditions, autoimmune disease, early-onset dementia, convulsions, anaphylaxis, inflammation of the heart, and antibody dependent enhancement leading to death; this includes children ages 12-17 years old.

I’ll take the early treatment and develop natural antibodies please. Should be my choice to make. Many of those who are agreeing to the mandated jab are already having regrets and it all originated from the installation of fear and the promotion of hysteria and the unfortunate trust placed in our leaders and governments.

Newms
Newms
1 year ago
Reply to  Lynn

Stop spreading nonsense. The list of what vaccines can cause is completely misinformation.

S.D.
S.D.
8 months ago
Reply to  Lynn

You are being bamboozled. Dr. M is making money off people like you. He saw an opportunity to make $$$$. He’s taking it.

Twise
Twise
1 year ago

When Dr. McCullough can provide credible clinical study results that these drugs and supplements are actually effective, I’m onboard. But since no legitimate clinical studies have produced any evidence whatsoever to prove his damned claims, I’m not onboard. Especially since people are now overdosing on ivermectin in an effort to cure themselves…because of the irresponsible advice of people like Dr. McCullough.

Keep It Real
Keep It Real
1 year ago
Reply to  Twise

When something like Covid is ravaging….you don’t start clinical treatment trials…you treat each patient promptly with know effective many times before used treatments based on their symptoms. To send patients home empty handed…with easily treatable symptoms…just because they test positive on a test that is known for false positives is as close to murder as you can get.

S.D.
S.D.
8 months ago
Reply to  Keep It Real

Yes, and when the clinical trials prove that it doesn’t work or does more harm than good, then you retract your statements.

S.D.
S.D.
8 months ago

Oh yes, I bet he is treating everyone for free? Wake up, lady. He saw an opportunity to make money and he took it.

Lynn
Lynn
1 year ago
Reply to  jmk

“Dr. Byram Bridle, a pro-vaccine Associate Professor on Viral Immunology at the University of Guelph, gives a terrifying warning of the harms of the experimental treatments in a new peer reviewed scientifically published research study21 on COVID-19 shots. The added Spike Protein to the “vaccine” gets into the blood, circulates through the blood in individuals over several days post-vaccination, it accumulates in the tissues such as the spleen, bone marrow, the liver, the adrenal glands, testes, and of great concern, it accumulates high concentrations into the ovaries. Dr. Bridle notes that they “have known for a long time that the Spike Protein is a pathogenic protein, it is a toxin, and can cause damage if it gets into blood circulation.” The study confirms the combination is causing clotting, neurological damage, bleeding, heart problems, etc. There is a high concentration of the Spike Protein getting into breast milk and reports of suckling infants developing bleeding disorders in the gastrointestinal tract. There are further warnings that this injection will render children infertile, and that people who have been vaccinated should NOT donate blood.”

Lynn
Lynn
1 year ago
Reply to  jmk

Dr. McCullough is an internist, cardiologist, epidemiologist, and Professor of Medicine at Texas A & M College of Medicine, Dallas, TX USA. Since the outset of the pandemic, Dr. McCullough has been a leader in the medical response to the COVID-19 disaster and has published “Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection” the first synthesis of sequenced multidrug treatment of ambulatory patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the American Journal of Medicine and subsequently updated in Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine. He has 40 peer-reviewed publications on the infection and has commented extensively on the medical response to the COVID-19 crisis in TheHill and on FOX NEWS Channel. On November 19, 2020, Dr. McCullough testified in the US Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and throughout 2021 in the Texas Senate Committee on Health and Human Services, Colorado General Assembly, and New Hampshire Senate concerning many aspects of the pandemic response.
Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, FACP, FACC, FAHA, FCRSA, FCCP, FNKF, FNLA
Professor of Medicine, Texas A & M College of Medicine
Board Certified Internist and Cardiologist
President Cardiorenal Society of America
Editor-in-Chief, Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
Editor-in-Chief, Cardiorenal Medicine
Senior Associate Editor, American Journal of Cardiology
For more information about Dr. McCullough, please visit: heartplace.com/dr-peter-a-mcculloughPeter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, FACP, FACC, FAHA, FCRSA, FCCP, FNKF, FNLA
Professor of Medicine, Texas A & M College of Medicine
Board Certified Internist and Cardiologist
President Cardiorenal Society of America
Editor-in-Chief, Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
Editor-in-Chief, Cardiorenal Medicine
Senior Associate Editor, American Journal of Cardiology

** I think this guy has a ‘bit’ of knowledge and authority on the matter.

Jennifer Freiburg
Jennifer Freiburg
1 year ago
Reply to  jmk

Look at the high quality research studies that he uses as evidence to his claims before you carelessly and sheepishly follow efforts to discredit him.

Newms
Newms
1 year ago

There is no credible research he has done to prove this is effective treatment. If you’d rather take these other things then soo be it.

Twise
Twise
1 year ago
Reply to  jmk

No point in arguing with the tinfoil hat brigade who have evidently required superior knowledge to that of epidemiologists and virologists seemingly by some sort of supernatural osmosis. They “research!!!” smh. The majority of these people probably couldn’t pass a biology 101 class at the community college but they honestly believe they’re smarter than educated people who do actual research in a lab and continue to discover medical breakthroughs that save lives. I’ve never been so mortified in my life to identify as Conservative than right now – I have no desire whatsoever to be affiliated with these obstinate Neanderthals and their paranoid ABSURD conspiracy theories. Thanks, Trump! It’s like you’ve produced an over abundance of little mini-me’s for the world to laugh at and ridicule🤨

Newms
Newms
1 year ago
Reply to  Twise

Yep tell me about it. Very nice to see someone out there who’s knowledgeable. I am surprised you call yourself conservative. I didn’t think there are people out there like yourself ! Thanks for attempting to give their heads a shake.

Newms
Newms
1 year ago
Reply to  Twise

Also looks like this dr is one of Fox News spokesperson or something

Newms
Newms
1 year ago
Reply to  Twise

I am here because someone tried telling me this dr is very knowledgeable in covid treatments. I have been trying to say what you have said already with regards to ivermectin as a treatment.

Keep It Real
Keep It Real
1 year ago
Reply to  Twise

In Case you haven’t noticed…Virologists and Epidemiologists have a vested intetest in the end results preferred by their BigPharma financiers

S.D.
S.D.
8 months ago
Reply to  Keep It Real

So do Trump and the GOP big contributors. So does Dr. McCollough. Why do you suspect it only goes one way?

Jennie
Jennie
1 year ago
Reply to  jmk

Who’s checking the fact checkers?

Pat Martin
Pat Martin
10 months ago
Reply to  jmk

Yep. Thrown out of his position in TX.

Bruce
Bruce
9 months ago
Reply to  jmk

It is 97% a doctor who doesn’t have infectious disease, immunology, or virology credentials who offers these opinions.

S.D.
S.D.
8 months ago
Reply to  jmk

Yes, he is gaining wealth by promoting HCQ and appeasing the right. $$$$ he’s making money- more than he would as a legit physician. Pretty gross.

Rachel Pozzesi
Rachel Pozzesi
1 year ago

Excellent article! Thank you so much for sharing this valuable and life-saving information!! Sharing with all my friends and family!

Linda Herman
Linda Herman
1 year ago

John Hopkins has published a report on the failure of vaccines to elicit an antibody response in transplant/immunocompromised patients. This leaves a very high risk segment of the community extremely vulnerable. The NIH website lists places where they are distributing monoclonal antibodies, FDA approved treatments, however they have to be administered at an outpatient infusion clinic. Not one of the places listed in Portland knows anything about these infusions, I called all of them. My husband is a transplant patient with multiple comorbidities, our own transplant center said to call the CDC. This is crazy, we don’t have access to life saving FDA approved treatment? Why is this, who’s accountable?

Heidi Wetzler
Heidi Wetzler
1 year ago
Reply to  Linda Herman

Thank you for your comment. I highly encourage you to submit an opinion piece for publication from your personal experience. We need more voices asking these questions. Best, Heidi

Shari
Shari
1 year ago
Reply to  Linda Herman

Also transplanted in Portland, OR. I’ve been doing research on prophylactic nasal sprays which don’t yet have all the “required studies” for effectiveness, though the small studies show a huge benefit and early treatment option. There is one sold OTC in the USA. Do the research, you’ll find it.

Mandy
Mandy
1 year ago
Reply to  Linda Herman

A patient I treated had a kidney transplant and he was told not to get it because of his immune system.

Debi Sinor
Debi Sinor
1 year ago
Reply to  Linda Herman

WHO also shares that not enough testing has been done to determine efficacy of the RNA vaccines on immuno compromised individuals. My husband is not a transplant patient but on the same medication (Celcept) to treat another rare condition. I beieve all neurological conditions fall in the immuno compromised category. And the RNA vaccines are all that’s being offered in our area.

Patricia Carlson
Patricia Carlson
1 year ago

I’m wondering how to contact treatment centers that offer early intervention for covid 19? There is reference to 35 centers in Texas. Are there any in WA? Are there telemedicine ways to access HCQ and AZM or DOXY at the beginning of infection. One of Dr. McCullough’s articles shows an early treatment pack given to patients in Brazil. Why is this not available here?

CYNTHIA SCHENK
CYNTHIA SCHENK
1 year ago

We have doctor’s in Louisiana that are offering the monoclonal treatments!

Jon
Jon
1 year ago

Excellent article. The disturbing suppression of cheap drug approaches to Covid is beyond suspicious. The battle has spread to India where the Mumbai-based Indian Bar Association has taken legal action against the WHO’s Dr Soumya Swaminathan of “Running a disinformation campaign against Ivermectin by deliberate suppression of effectiveness of drug Ivermectin as prophylaxis and for treatment of COVID-19.”

Last edited 1 year ago by Jon
Timothy C. Frey
Timothy C. Frey
1 year ago
Reply to  Jon

Jon, can you post the results of the Recovery trial for Hydroxychloroquine, and Azithromycin in the treatment of Covid 19? Thanks

Millie
Millie
1 year ago

What a wonderful article representing Dr. McCullough’s great love for people and his awesome knowledge in caring so skillfully for his patients. Top of his field!

Now, as regards the disgraceful Fact Checkers: paid deceivers that they are, who MUST be Fact-Checked themselves…please, anyone who is about to be led astray by these Judas’ characters, this is what you may wish to do…do a little dive and search their names or the name of their website and trace who funds them. Since when do we need some fact-checking entity to tell us what to believe?? Can we not make our own analysis of material we read??

I just did a search into a so-called fact-checking website called healthfeedback.org. This fact checking site has attempted to sour people from listening to Dr. McCullough. Yet, when you do a search on the person who wrote the article you find out this:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/05/shocking-development-singapore-woman-linked-bill-gates-soros-china-flagging-removing-video-content-california-doctors-behind-viral-video/?

Do your own research folks. Beware of anyone and anything called Fact Checker!

Jason
Jason
1 year ago
Reply to  Millie

Thanks for the research and posting it! Most people don’t put in the effort, and only listen to the MSM pundits.

Norma
Norma
1 year ago
Reply to  Millie

Gateway Pundit? You might want to do some research on them. Leftie publication (snark) Forbes says, “The Gateway Pundit, a far right news website which wouldn’t comment for this story, pushes a daily deluge of false, misleading or fake stories to a conservative audience eager to believe them—with much of the misinformation focused on the election, Covid-19 and the vaccine rollout, according to a new analysis by the Center for Countering Digital Hate.”

L Easterling
L Easterling
1 year ago
Reply to  Millie

Amen

Dave C.
Dave C.
1 year ago

Here is the link to the AAPS “The Guide to Home-Based Covid Treatment” that Dr. Peter McCullough was the consulting editor on. It also has other info links at the end.

https://aapsonline.org/CovidPatientTreatmentGuide.pdf

I heard Dr. McCullough on the radio today and he said that there are some updated technical medical journal articles that have recently been published (June 2021) on his recommended drugs for EARLY Covid treatment – that is, right after an initial positive test, primarily in those over age 50. So doctors have access to this information, but he said that patients must be very assertive to find a doctor that will use these drugs.

Though he is vaccinated himself, he also expressed significant concerns about giving the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines to pregnant/nursing women or to children. It was not clear to me about whether he thinks the Johnson & Johnson vaccine is significantly safer (though it uses a somewhat different method that has been used before in a few other vaccines). There have also been rare blood clots reported in the J&J vaccine with women under age 40, but it seems there are more reported side effects in all groups with the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines. In any case, Dr. McCullough said that the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are brand-new experimental technogy, and carry significant risk of migration of the Covid spike protein around the body, which could cause toxic effects.

Personally, I am waiting for the final approval of the Novavax vaccine (good clinical trials results just announced). It uses only an inactivated version of the Covid spike protein and an immune system booster, more like a traditional vaccine. It should have much less chance of serious side effects than the other three vaccines – which “instruct” cells of the body to produce the spike protein. It may be available in August/September – but no word yet. Several news articles about this if you search news for Novavax vaccine.

I’d suggest reading up on all of the vaccines and how they work with a Net search for articles and videos. You can search on:
vaccines + Johnson & Johnson + Moderna + Novavax + spike protein.

There is also a good YouTube video here from a doctor particularly on the Novavax vaccine:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q00lyd3gyy4

D NYC
D NYC
1 year ago

I think you mean “tenet” here:

“The first tenant of this code begins as follows”

Dave C.
Dave C.
1 year ago

Regarding the concerns expressed by Dr. McCullough on the mRNA vaccines (Moderna & Pfizer):

Many news sites this week have reported that the Novavax vaccine has just passed all its clinical trials and may be available in August/September. It is a traditional vaccine.

New York Times Novavax article:
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/14/health/covid-vaccine-novavax.html

Below is a link to a long, detailed YouTube video where a physician (popular YouTuber “DrBeen”) explains the Novavax vaccine in detail and why it may be MUCH safer (lower possibility of side affects) option than the current three vaccines. Novavax just uses a nanoparticle with the inactivated spike protein itself plus an immune system booster – no mRNA, no viral vector, no entry of material into the cells at all. Dr. Been uses lots of good drawings and diagrams.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q00lyd3gyy4

Jo Anne Costello
1 year ago

When Dr. Fauci testified in Congress, he admitted that only ~30% of his staff at NIH were vaccinated. It’s important to note that much of the information uncovered in his emails hadn’t been published yet. We should all be alarmed at the content. We read his professional position on the ineffectiveness of cloth & paper masks, the communications with Zuckerberg on what scientific info would be “permitted” on social media, the shady misdirection of Wuhan lab leak possibility, *comments on the use of cheap & effective treatments and preventative measures like Ivermectin, Hydroxychloriquin and supplements – which weren’t being discussed or studied*, etc….
WHY are vaccines still being pushed on healthy children, in light of the potential for injury and death? COVID-19 has killed approximately 300 Americans under the age of 18 – a minuscule percentage.

Sylvie
Sylvie
1 year ago

Doctors want to give pills that infected people can take conveniently at home when symptoms first appear. Toward that end, the Biden administration announced in June that it would spend more than $3 billion on a program aimed at developing next-generation antiviral therapies—not just for COVID but also for other viruses that pose a future threat.” 

“The Biden administration has already committed to purchasing 1.7 million courses of molnupiravir, should it be authorized for use. 

Ssw
Ssw
1 year ago
Reply to  Sylvie

Ivermectin is the precursor to Molnupiravir. Merck is ihe original manufacturer of Ivermectin. They have the formulation for it. But its patent expired in 1996. The organisation (including WHO, FDA, CDC, NIH) does not endorse IVM for off-label use to treat Covid-19 patients or as a prophylacis citing the lack of in-depth, peer reviewed clinical trials for its safety & efficacy. ( We should cite the same reason for rejecting the mRNA vaccines). However since its discovery of its ability to inhibit the virus’ multiplication in vitro, its use as early as May 2020 has spread to at least 30> countries notably in the poorer ones. The treatment using IVM includes taking together with zinc, Vit C, Vit D & selenium. Go to http://www.flccc.net headed by De Pierre Kory for a comprehensive info on IVM. Merck, the WHO, FDA & co has the truth to why they want to wait for Molnupiravir & not endorese the extremely cheap & easily available IVM that could have severely dimished the hospitalisations & deaths.

Achsel
Achsel
1 year ago
Reply to  Ssw

Except Ivermectin has been on the marketv40 years and used around the world. A safety study found 75 reports of adverse events in the entire world over 40 years. That’s a better safety record than aspirin!

Mick Stephens
Mick Stephens
1 year ago

Wonderful article. The question as to why no governments are providing early treatment methods is reprehensible and stinks of a hidden agenda

Bob
Bob
1 year ago
Reply to  clk

Shame on you for not referencing the author of that article…. a Singapore woman who works for the gates foundation. Not exactly a reliable source. Anybody with a working brain cell can clearly see the conflict of interest.

Bob
Bob
1 year ago
Reply to  clk

Compare Dr. McCullough, the leading specialist in his field, more highly decorated and published than even your sainted Fauci, with some random “fact checker” msm presstitute directly involved with the gates foundation. Now ask yourself, who are you going to trust? The qualified doctor? Or the gates foundation flunkie who wants to protect her bosses investment? Conflict of interest! Hello… You really should know the word “fact checker” is a meaningless media term of private for profit institutions claiming zero authority to back their claims, and in no way are held accountable for the slander they are the prime movers for. Fact checkers are nothing more than soviet censorship and it is all sponsored by the very same corporate interests profiting off this medical experiment on an unwitting humanity.

Jack Burton
Jack Burton
1 year ago