Politicians like Governor Inslee frequently boast about their commitment to the environment, but too often their actions and results fall far short of their rhetoric according to Todd Myers

Todd Myers
Washington Policy Center

Politicians like Governor Inslee frequently boast about their commitment to the environment, but too often their actions and results fall far short of their rhetoric.

Recently, Susannah Frame of KING 5 TV in Seattle highlighted that on many of the environmental issues highlighted by the Inslee Administration, they are missing their goals badly. However, one metric Frame mentioned in passing – Washington’s recycling rate – shows just how unserious the governor and agency staff are about meeting his own environmental promises.

Under “Sustainable Energy & Clean Environment Metrics,” Results Washington has a metric that claims to measure progress on recycling. There are numerous problems in just this one slipshod graphic.

First, there is no indication of what the recycling target should be. Is 40.7% good or bad? We don’t know because the state hasn’t set a target. The purpose of measuring is to track progress toward a goal and assess what policies are needed to achieve it. Without a goal, this metric is meaningless.

Second, the graphic contradicts itself. At the top, the metric is “Solid Waste Recycling Rate.” Below that, however, it says “recovery rate,” which is different. The state defines recycling as, “transforming or remanufacturing waste materials into usable or marketable materials for use other than landfill disposal or incineration.” Recovery rate is different. “The recovery rate calculation includes materials collected for recycling and other forms of recovery in the nominator, and the recoverable portion of solid wastes generated, including municipal solid waste and other waste types disposed in the denominator.” The terminology is inconsistent even within the small graphic.

The 40.7% metric listed in the graphic is for recycling, not recovery. Choosing recycling rate is strange because the state stopped using it as a metric in 2016. Given a choice between the recycling and recovery rates, Results Washington chose the one that hasn’t been used for nearly seven years.

The final absurdity is that while both recycling and recovery rate have been getting worse over the last decade, the graphic shows the arrow going up right next to the words “trending down.” Results Washington staff can’t even make the arrow match the words.

Since Jay Inslee created Results Washington in 2013 with the promise that it would hold government accountable, the agency has focused more on whitewashing the administration’s failures than finding ways to succeed. Routinely, the “Public Performance Reviews” with the governor are cheerleading sessions, focusing on whatever positive trends they can find, while ignoring evidence of failures.

The recycling graphic is just one more example of how disingenuous the Inslee Administration’s claims about accountability have been.  

Todd Myers is the director of the Center for the Environment at the Washington Policy Center.

---

Also read:

• 
  Opinion: State CO2 report shows 86% of Washington’s claimed climate benefits are probably fake
  Todd Myers argues a state climate report significantly overstates emissions reductions and raises concerns about data accuracy and accountability in Washington’s climate spending.
• 
  Opinion: Majority party policies still making life more expensive for Washingtonians
  Rep. John Ley outlines his opposition to new taxes, raises concerns about state spending, and details legislation he plans to pursue during the 2026 Washington legislative session.
• 
  Opinion: What happens when you build a state budget on the most volatile tax sources?
  Ryan Frost argues that relying on volatile tax sources like income and capital gains taxes risks destabilizing Washington’s budget and undermining long-term fiscal planning.
• 
  Letter: Has $450 million been wasted on a bridge that’s too low for the Coast Guard with a foundation too costly to build?
  A Seattle engineer questions whether hundreds of millions of dollars have been spent on a bridge design he argues is unnecessarily risky and costly compared to an immersed tunnel alternative.
• 
  Opinion: Fix Washington – House Republicans lead the charge against liberal chaos
  Nancy Churchill argues that one-party Democratic control has driven up costs, weakened public safety, and harmed schools, and says House Republicans are offering a path forward through their Fix Washington agenda.