Todd Myers asks ‘what do we do from here?’
Todd Myers
Washington Policy Center
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
Early in the 2025 legislative session, there was a lot of hopeful talk from the new governor about reining in emergency powers, reducing the misuse of emergency clauses and keeping the budget under control after a decade of huge increases. This would have been a welcome change from Governor Inslee who repeatedly abused his power and left the state worse than he found it in many areas.
Ultimately, Governor’s Ferguson’s first session failed in all of those areas. A bill to limit emergency powers supported by the governor was not adopted.
The governor vetoed some meaningless emergency clauses but left others that were designed to undermine the ability of the people of Washington to vote on these issues. According to the legislative code revisor’s office, there were about 48 bills that included emergency clause language in some form. Not all of these were abusive, but some were, and they were left in place.
And the budget increased both taxes and spending significantly. The tax increases are the largest in state history, by a large margin.
Additionally, the claim that these taxes only hit the wealthy is clearly wrong. The budget increases gas taxes, property taxes, fees for state parks and many other costs that will impact virtually everyone.
The notion that these new taxes are needed to pay for the budget is also dubious. The state budget has increased by 51% after inflation and population growth since 2013. It is also important to note that despite that dramatic increase in spending, Washington has failed badly at its most basic functions – educating children, promoting public safety, providing reliable roads and ferries, preserving our environment, etc.
There are some good things that were removed from the budget. For example, we highlighted last year’s wasteful $45 million EV subsidy that ended up subsidizing the wealthy while doing little to reduce CO2 emissions. Although Governor Inslee wanted to increase funding for those subsidies, the program was eliminated from the budget.
Additionally, Gov Ferguson vetoed some bad spending. Including $200,000 to teach low-income families how to ice skate (this is real). Another veto eliminated about $2 million to study offshore wind turbines with some of that money being directed to one of Jay Inslee’s former advisors. We highlighted that waste as well. This is good news.
But Governor Ferguson’s vetoes reduce the budget by a total of about $25 million. That is nothing. It amounts to .03% of the state biennial budget. There are individual line items that could save that much. For example, the budget includes $22,544,000 just for local government climate planning. There is another $10 million to help activist groups and local governments access federal climate grants – spending taxpayer money to get more taxpayer money.
What do we do from here?
Todd Myers is vice president for research at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- POLL: After hearing state leaders describe the I-5 Bridge as vulnerable in an earthquake, what is your reaction?
State and local leaders describe the I-5 Bridge as structurally at risk but recommend drivers continue crossing it while complex replacement plans unfold. - Opinion: Historical state income tax and another massive operating budget highlight the end of the 2026 legislative session
Rep. John Ley details the passage of a state income tax, an expanding $80 billion budget, and new Clark County infrastructure funding following the 2026 legislative session. - VIDEO: Legal challenges certain as Gov. Ferguson prepares to sign new income tax
Senate Minority Leader John Braun and other legislators expect legal challenges and initiative efforts to follow Gov. Ferguson’s signature on Washington’s new income tax law affecting high earners and businesses. - Opinion: Fighting for transparency in Washington government
A recent court decision allows Washington lawmakers broad new secrecy over internal records, as advocates report rising obstacles to government transparency and public engagement. - New Washington law clarifies what is an ‘election’
After a court ruling challenged the state’s definition of “election,” lawmakers clarified the law to prevent double voting and maintain the integrity of Washington’s ballots.
