Opinion: Washington state stubbornly refuses to cut taxes for families

Chris Cargill of the Washington Policy Center points out how the hardliners in the Washington State Legislature have decided to keep extra money for their own spending priorities.

Chris Cargill of the Washington Policy Center points out how the hardliners in the Washington State Legislature have decided to keep extra money for their own spending priorities

Chris Cargill
Washington Policy Center

Most politicians could only dream of a scenario in which a flood of extra tax revenues suddenly lets them cut taxes in an election year. But clearly Washington state leaders think differently.

Chris Cargill
Chris Cargill

While other states move to cut taxes in these tough times, hardliners in the Washington State Legislature have decided to keep the extra money for their own spending priorities and offer no general relief. 

It’s not that they don’t have the cash. The state expects to take in more than $10 billion in extra revenue. Returning the surplus to families just wasn’t a top priority for the majority party.

It wasn’t as if they didn’t have bipartisan ideas – Olympia just wanted to spend it elsewhere. 

State tax revenue has surged to record levels over the past few years. That, coupled with an influx of COVID-related cash from the federal government, provided the perfect conditions for a tax reduction. Lawmakers just couldn’t find the will to pull the trigger.

Idaho lawmakers gave rebates to citizens last year and cut the income tax this year. 

California’s Governor has proposed some $9 billion in tax rebates.

New York state is going to return $2.2 billion in one-time property tax rebates for low and middle-income homeowners. The state also plans to cut tax rates by $162 million.

In Mississippi, lawmakers cut the state income tax and may repeal it altogether.

Maryland decided extra revenue and surging gas prices were enough to give drivers in the state a break. Governor Larry Hogan signed a temporary suspension of the Maryland gas tax.

Hawaii is considering a $300 tax rebate to those earning less than $100,000 per year, and $100 to those earning more.

In Indiana, taxpayers are receiving checks of about $125 each this month. That might not be much, but it is the principle of financial relief that counts.  

Across the country, regardless of political control, lawmakers are moving forward with reducing the tax burden.

Instead of returning even a morsel to working families, Washington state lawmakers decided they could better spend the cash themselves on a host of new government programs and offerings.

There are numerous options available. They could provide temporary relief from the state gas tax of almost 50-cents per gallon. They could reduce property taxes. They could cut the state sales tax, providing direct inflation relief. 

The state sales tax rate of 6.5% hasn’t been touched for 40 years. Reducing the sales tax would help working families most. Lawmakers again said no, despite bipartisan proposals.

If Washington ever was going to provide substantial broad-based tax relief, this is the year. Shockingly, the Senate majority leadership couldn’t find the time (or will) to hold even one public hearing on the bipartisan sales tax cut bill.

For about five minutes, lawmakers considered a three-day sales tax holiday and giving out free parking passes at state parks, but even those tight-fisted ideas were dropped.

There is always resistance to tax relief, including the laughable claim that giving people their own money back is a “cost” to the government. Let’s make something very clear – the money doesn’t belong to the government. Tax rebates or reductions don’t cost the government anything. It’s your money.

Because of the lack of action on any broad-based tax reduction, even a liberal columnist in the Seattle Times proclaimed, “Washington Democrats, you’re proving your tax critics right.”

Let’s hope that when the legislature meets again in January, members of both parties will come together in support of returning at least part of the tax surplus to those who own it and those who need it – the citizens.

This column appeared in the Spokesman-Review on April 15. 

Chris Cargill is the Eastern Washington Office director for the Washington Policy Center.

Also read:

Receive comment notifications
Notify of
guest

5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
christodamas
christodamas
7 months ago

Just wait until they start pushing for a digital currency. Then they can force you to spend ALL your money the way they see fit, not just what you pay in taxes.

Don’t worry, they are very smart people and they always have your best interests in mind.

Scott Hooper
Scott Hooper
7 months ago
Reply to  christodamas

I’m not sure the best argument against ‘them’ is a fictitious future you’ve made up. LOL

Who’s interests do you think they have in mind?

Susan
Susan
7 months ago

All hail the King! Bow down, citizens!

F***ing inslee needs to go.

Of course, the chances of that happening are slim to none. After all, if the fox is guarding the henhouse, the fox always chooses to stay when asked to leave.

If inslee remains in total control, as he is now, through the next election… then he will likely grow old and die before he leaves office. Is this what Washington voters really want? Wake up, folks! This state is a toilet thanks to inslee.

Last edited 7 months ago by Susan
Scott Hooper
Scott Hooper
7 months ago
Reply to  Susan

Rather than say “this state is…” and just add a judgment, why not tell us HOW you think Inslee has harmed our state.

I’ll start: I think he over-stepped his bounds when he went to court of the lower car tabs that the voters approved. I believe that, in a functioning democracy, the buck stops with the voters–by which I mean ALL voters, of course–and a Governor aught not to be able to argue. (but also note, as an FYI: on the whole, I think Inslee is a better than average Governor).

You?

Scott Hooper
Scott Hooper
7 months ago

Wait, you miss key facts to support your article, and particularly your negative view of WA’s decision.

  1. How are you deciding they have “$10 billion” extra? Are you comparing it to revenues during the Pandemic, or are you comparing it to what 2019 projections for this time would be? It is the projections that matter, because those are the basis for the programs run by the government.
  2. You hinted at some of the ideas for how to spend the money but only the ideas that were rejected. Were any accepted or did they seem popular?

It’s hard to know who to give money to in a state with no income tax. If they just handed out more cash to low income people, I imagine you would call it Socialism.

Programs that help people are just like a tax break, only often more effective because they support the people who need them most. This isn’t a “brother’s keeper” argument, but a suggestion that the greatest improvement to quality of life in the state is probably by doing something targeted, and not just splattering cash all over like DC did during the Pandemic.

I’d love to see those facts that you missed.

5
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
buy viagra online where can i buy viagra