Jason Mercier of the Washington Policy Center points out that many of the violations were with accounting and use of federal COVID relief funds
Jason Mercier
Washington Policy Center
The state auditor today released Washington’s “Financial Statements and Federal Single Audit Report” covering agency compliance with federal rules in 2021. The state auditor identified 62 violations, several dealing with accounting and use of federal COVID relief funds. According to the report:
“We issued an adverse opinion on the state’s compliance with requirements applicable to the 21.019 Coronavirus Relief Fund, 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, and 93.558 Temporary Assistance for Needy Families programs.”
Here is a sampling of the 62 audit findings:
- “The State lacked adequate internal controls over financial reporting for ensuring accurate recording and monitoring of financial activity in its financial statements.”
- “The Department of Social and Health Services did not have adequate internal controls to ensure payments were allowable and properly supported, and did not comply with federal requirements to conduct fiscal monitoring of subrecipients for the Coronavirus Relief Fund.”
- “The Department of Commerce did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with federal requirements to conduct fiscal monitoring of subrecipients and ensure payments were allowable and properly supported for the Coronavirus Relief Fund.”
- “The Office of Financial Management did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with reporting requirements for the Coronavirus Relief Fund.”
- “The Department of Commerce did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with federal requirements to ensure subrecipients of the Coronavirus Relief Fund received risk assessments.”
- “Washington State University did not establish adequate internal controls over and did not comply with federal requirements to conduct risk assessments of student information security for the Student Financial Assistance programs.”
- “The Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with requirements to ensure payments to subrecipients were adequately supported for the Special Education programs.”
- “The Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with requirements to perform risk assessments for subrecipients of the Education Stabilization Fund programs.”
- “The Department of Children, Youth, and Families did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with financial reporting requirements for the Child Care and Development Fund Cluster.”
- “The Health Care Authority did not have adequate internal controls over and did not comply with federal provider eligibility requirements for the Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance programs.”
The complete 1,083 page audit and the state’s response to the 62 findings are available here.
Jason Mercier is the director of the Center for Government Reform at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- Opinion: The income tax proposal has arrived
Ryan Frost of the Washington Policy Center argues that a proposed Washington income tax creates a new revenue stream rather than delivering tax reform or relief. - Opinion: ‘If they want light rail, they should be the ones who pay for it’
Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance argues that supporters of light rail tied to the I-5 Bridge replacement should bear the local cost of operating and maintaining the system through a narrowly drawn sub-district. - POLL: If a sub-district is created, what area should it include?
Clark County residents are asked where a potential C-TRAN sub-district should be drawn if voters are asked to fund light rail operations and maintenance costs. - Opinion: IBR falsely blaming inflation
Joe Cortright argues that inflation explains only a small portion of the IBR project’s cost increases and that rising consultant and staff expenses are the primary drivers. - Letter: The Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s $141 million bribe can be better spent on sandwich steel-concrete tubes
Bob Ortblad argues that an immersed tunnel using sandwich steel-concrete tubes would be a more cost-effective alternative to the current Interstate Bridge Replacement Program design.
