
Elizabeth New (Hovde) believes lawmakers need to deal with bad eligibility decisions and the lack of estate recovery attached to Medicaid’s long-term-care services to save real money
Elizabeth New (Hovde)
Washington Policy Center
Eventual beneficiaries of WA Cares — a mandatory state program that takes wages from W2 workers to fund long-term-care services for some people — won’t be able to pay just anyone to provide them with state-approved caregiving services. No, providers will need official registration with Washington state’s Department of Social and Health Services, after applying for and being offered a contract. They will then need to seek pre-authorization for any services they provide. (Read more or watch more about the process here and here.)

An application process for potential long-term-care (LTC) providers opens Oct. 1, 2025, before the program starts giving out money in 2026. Those interested can review a somewhat overwhelming “provider toolkit” to learn more and get ready. They can also register for a WA Cares provider webinar on Nov. 4. WA Cares’ webinars are informative and usually allow for some questions and answers.
Caregivers who are already registered providers through other state caregiving programs have been asking program staff if they’ll still need to apply to be a caregiver with WA Cares. The answer is “yes.” Providers should also know the amount of pay a caregiver can receive has been determined by the state. The WA Cares website says. “Rate maximums will be published in administrative rules and will be made available through a rate sheet online. Check the status of these rules on the rulemaking page.”
Family caregivers
Relatives of a WA Cares beneficiary can become eligible for compensation from the state, too, although the process is a little different — and state-approved training will be required. Both provider setup and training will be through a network linked to Service Employees International Union, the caregivers’ union that also represents Medicaid-paid caregivers. (The state is contracting with SEIU to create family caregiver training now.) I hope to learn more at the upcoming webinar titled, “Spotlight on paid family caregiving with WA Cares.” It’s at 11 a.m. on Oct. 23. Register for that one here.
The WA Cares website says this: “If you want to provide in-home personal care (including respite) but don’t work for a business, you can apply to be an individual provider and be paid through Consumer Direct Care Network Washington. Most paid family caregivers will become individual providers.” The explanation continues, “Consumer Direct Care Network Washington will process your application, hire you, provide your training and pay you for the hours you work.”
Washington state has created a new, worker-paid workforce with WA Cares, linking union oversight and training to the program. The state also carries the weight of a lot of administration. All this while offering only some workers a return on the WA Cares investment they’re required to make during their working years. Right now, W2 workers without an exemption pay 58 cents of every $100 they earn to WA Cares to maybe qualify for up to $36,500 if they ever need LTC services. Individuals can see the annual amount taken from their paychecks here.
Better LTC financing solutions
Letting workers, including low-income ones, keep more of their wages for all their life needs, rather than saving for one need they might never have, would be better for workers — especially when a safety net for people in true need of LTC already exists.
That safety net is being abused, however. Lawmakers need to deal with bad eligibility decisions and the lack of estate recovery attached to Medicaid’s long-term-care services to save real money. For now, our state is busy building another government program, penalizing work and taking wages that workers could use for other life needs.
Elizabeth New (Hovde) is a policy analyst and the director of the Centers for Health Care and Workers Rights at the Washington Policy Center. She is a Clark County resident.
Also read:
- White House govt. Funding request for 2027 cuts $73 billionPresident Trump’s budget seeks to boost defense funding while cutting $73 billion from agencies like the EPA, NASA, and Agriculture, prompting sharp criticism from Democratic leaders.
- Heywood asks WA Supreme Court to allow referendum effort on income taxBrian Heywood is petitioning the state Supreme Court after the Secretary of State rejected a referendum to repeal Washington’s new 9.9% tax on income over $1 million.
- Opinion: Half the road, full stop – Understanding pedestrian right-of-wayDoug Dahl explains how Washington’s law requires drivers to stop when a pedestrian is within one lane of their half of the road, not just when directly in front.
- Clark County seeks volunteer for Law and Justice CouncilApplicants with experience in mental health services are encouraged to help guide Clark County’s coordination of local criminal justice and corrections planning.
- VIDEO: Families at center of WA transgender sports debate face-to-face with OSPITwo Washington high school students and their parents met with Superintendent Chris Reykdal to discuss concerns about sports policies after one student faced an investigation for harassment.
- As Washington lawmakers punt on school cellphone ban, some want more actionAt Robert Eagle Staff Middle School, all-day phone removal led to fewer conflicts and more student engagement, but some parents and lawmakers argue a ban should not be imposed statewide.
- Opinion: The state’s RFK-proofing bill comes with a costMandates like HB 2242 can lead to higher premiums as insurance companies absorb costs for new preventive services, affecting affordability statewide.








