Until the election, expect supporters of the misguided and mandatory long-term-care program to continue misleading Washingtonians about what WA Cares does and who benefits from I-2124
Elizabeth New (Hovde)
Washington Policy Center
A “No on 2124” email in my inbox erroneously says that Initiative 2124, the measure that would make participation in WA Cares voluntary instead of mandatory, “only benefits the super wealthy and big private insurance companies.”
False. Many Washington state workers being penalized by having 58 cents of every $100 they earn taken from their paychecks disagree. Many family caregivers who don’t expect to benefit from WA Cares disagree.
It is accurate to say that WA Cares — the state program that will be impacted should voters say “yes” to I-2124 — will benefit the state budget and Service Employees International Union 775, which is WA Cares’ main supporter and I-2124’s main opponent.
In addition, some, but not all, workers who end up needing long-term-care services someday — and who have paid taxes to WA Cares during their entire career years — will receive a $36,500 payout from the state program. That is not the primary purpose of this fund, however. (Nor is that amount adequate to fund most people’s long-term-care needs.) The purpose of the WA Cares Fund is to give the state more money to work with and create more taxpayer-funded caregivers.
Those who qualify for a WA Cares benefit in years to come might not need to be dependent on other taxpayers for long-term care, even though the money they’ll receive was gathered from workers of all incomes, including some who were taxpayer-dependent. Other workers who clear the qualification hurdles in front of a WA Cares benefit and do have a financial need for long-term care would have been eligible for funds in an already existing safety net (Medicaid) without having a portion of their wages taken for years.
Until the election, and probably after, expect supporters of the misguided and mandatory long-term-care program to continue misleading Washingtonians about what WA Cares does and who benefits from I-2124. The misleading information complements the state’s practice of offering false promises about WA Cares.
Elizabeth New (Hovde) is a policy analyst and the director of the Centers for Health Care and Workers Rights at the Washington Policy Center. She is a Clark County resident.
Also read:
- Two GOP state lawmakers consider running against Gluesenkamp Perez
Two Republican state leaders, John Braun and Jim Walsh, are weighing campaigns to unseat U.S. Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez in Washington’s 3rd Congressional District, a nationally watched swing seat. - Social media activity of Clark County public defender questioned
Public Defender Renee Alsept’s anti-Trump social media posts have sparked concern from citizens and former officials, but Clark County says personal accounts aren’t covered by policy. - WATCH: Sen. Braun urges Ferguson to get past fearmongering on ‘big beautiful bill’Sen. John Braun criticized Gov. Ferguson’s opposition to the Big Beautiful Bill, calling it partisan fearmongering and defending the bill’s work requirements and spending controls.
- Primary and Special Election important informationClark County Elections will mail ballots beginning July 15 for the Aug. 5 Primary and Special Election. Voters needing a replacement ballot or help registering can contact the Elections Office.
- Public comment prevails: No action taken on Clerk agenda item at Clark County Council meetingClark County Council declined to advance a proposal to make the County Clerk position appointed, deferring the issue to the Charter Review Commission after public concerns over transparency.
