Vancouver resident Peter Bracchi says citizens who raised questions at City Council meetings were met with silence

Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and may not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com

Most residents of Vancouver have never heard of ICLEI — the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives. Yet our city is a member. Citizens who raised this at City Council meetings were met with silence. No explanation, no clarification, no open debate. While City Hall stays quiet, the evidence of ICLEI’s influence is plain to see.

ICLEI provides local governments with global frameworks: Complete Streets, 15-minute neighborhoods, climate action plans, density-based redevelopment. These are packaged as “best practices,” but they also shift power toward city officials and away from the people who live here.

Look at the Heights District. Marketed as revitalization of the old Tower Mall, it is being rebuilt into a dense, mixed-use, walkable community — mirroring ICLEI’s model. The project emphasizes reduced car use, mixed-income housing, and transit access. Even the $17.5 million federal grant backing its infrastructure reflects how aligning with these global principles opens doors to outside funding.

This is how ICLEI empowers officials:

• Legitimacy — city leaders cite international “best practices” to advance controversial projects.

• Tools & metrics — staff use standardized scorecards and frameworks, not community-crafted vision.

• Funding leverage — aligning with ICLEI language makes projects more competitive for state and federal dollars.

Meanwhile, citizens are left with fewer choices. When residents organized against road diets through Save Vancouver Streets, their initiative was blocked in court. When annexation was floated — even with projected deficits of tens of millions — the conversation moved forward anyway. All while silence on ICLEI remained.

Candidate for mayor Justin Forsman has been one of the few willing to say it directly: Vancouver’s membership in ICLEI erodes local sovereignty. He has pledged to end that membership, stop following international frameworks, and restore decision-making to the people of Vancouver. Whether you agree with him or not, he is at least addressing the issue that City Hall refuses to acknowledge.

To be clear, ICLEI is not a mystery. Its own materials outline five guiding principles for cities: zero-emission, nature-based, equitable, resilient, and circular development. Many of Vancouver’s projects, from road diets to the Heights District, echo these very themes. For those who want to judge for themselves, ICLEI makes its principles available at iclei.org.

If ICLEI membership truly benefits Vancouver, City Hall should be proud to explain how. If not, it should end the membership and let residents design their own future. What we cannot accept is silence while global frameworks are quietly put in place.

Vancouver deserves transparency. Vancouver deserves self-determination. Vancouver deserves leaders who answer to its people — not to international networks.

Peter Bracchi
Vancouver

---

Also read:

• 
  Opinion: Despite historic tax hikes – Washington state faces $4.3 billion deficit
  Ryan Frost argues that Washington’s projected multibillion-dollar deficits stem from rapid spending growth, not a lack of revenue, after years of historic tax hikes.
• 
  Letter: A misleading headline about a misleading initiative
  Battle Ground resident Gary Obermeyer argues that Initiative 26-126 would restrict voting access rather than improve election integrity.
• 
  POLL: Do you support Vancouver’s decision to restore open public comment at every council meeting starting in 2026?
  Vancouver will restore open public comment at every council meeting in 2026 after years of limiting remarks to agenda items.
• 
  Opinion: Washington is bleeding taxpayers and now a State Representative wants to make it worse
  Mark Harmsworth argues that a proposed statewide payroll tax would worsen Washington’s ongoing loss of jobs, businesses, and economic competitiveness.
• 
  Opinion: Simultaneous left turns
  Doug Dahl explains how Washington law directs drivers to make simultaneous left turns by passing to the left of each other in an intersection.