
Charles Prestrud says that even though motorists are paying taxes on CO2 emissions, they won’t see any benefit when it comes to highway maintenance or completion of needed improvements
Charles Prestrud
Washington Policy Center
An editorial in the July 5th Wall Street Journal suggests that Washington State is imitating California. They don’t mean that in a good way. Their point is that Washington residents shouldn’t be surprised that the state’s new tax on carbon-based fuels has made our gas prices the highest in the U.S. Several years ago California enacted a similar cap-and-trade tax on carbon fuels and their gas prices are nearly as high as ours.

My colleague Todd Myers has shown that Washington’s carbon tax has increased the price of gas by about 44 cents per gallon, and that is on top of Washington’s 49.4 cent per gallon gas tax, which was already one of the highest in the U.S. It’s easy to blame the oil companies for high prices but their profit margins are slim compared to the taxes the state is raking in.
The Wall Street Journal editorial hit the nail on the head, but the high price of gas is only half the story. Washington is also following California’s lead in another way that isn’t good, which is the deteriorating condition of our highways. Anyone who has driven on I-5 through Seattle will have noticed this, and it’s confirmed by the Reason Foundation’s Annual Highway Report which ranks Washington State’s highways 46th out of the fifty states, just one notch above California. The dire need for highway system repair and repaving has not escaped the attention of WSDOT. WSDOT Secretary Roger Millar has gone so far as to say “the system is on a glide-path to failure”. WSDOT has estimated that an additional $350 million per year is needed to bring the state highway system up to a state of good repair, but they have no plan to accomplish that.
You might think the hundreds of millions of dollars the State is collecting from the tax on CO2 emissions ought to go a long way toward funding high priority maintenance work. However, when the State Legislature adopted the carbon tax they specifically prohibited using the revenue for fixing state highways. Instead, the revenue is doled out to a smorgasbord of “green” programs the effectiveness of which remains to be seen. Meanwhile the backlog of deferred maintenance continues to grow.
So, even though motorists are paying taxes on CO2 emissions every time they go to the gas station, they won’t see any benefit when it comes to highway maintenance or completion of needed improvements.
Charles Prestrud is the director of the Coles Center for Transportation at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- VIDEO: Rep. John Ley – I-5 Bridge replacement project is a ‘light rail project in search of a bridge’Rep. John Ley criticizes IBR design that allocates 54% of bridge surface to transit while costs balloon to $14.4 billion.
- Letter: IBR/Light rail and chronic homelessnessVancouver resident Bob Zak criticizes city council’s light rail endorsement and calls for tougher homeless policies.
- Opinion: Crashes, crime, and confusion – Who’s responsible in parking lots?Target Zero Manager Doug Dahl explains why police rarely patrol grocery store parking lots and what drivers can do.
- POLL: Should Clark County’s 2022 anti-light rail resolution still guide council decisions today?Wednesday’s council meeting reignited debate over the county’s 2022 resolution requiring voter approval for light rail projects.
- Letter: Update – Extremely low bus ridership does not justify expensive TriMet light railCamas resident challenges IBR’s $3.5 billion light rail plan with C-TRAN ridership data showing transit use has halved since 2006.






