
‘Until the legislature and governor develop a spending plan that is sustainable and responsible, Washington will continue on the spiral of increased budgets requiring increased taxes that do more damage to the business climate’ – Todd Myers, Washington Policy Center
Todd Myers
Washington Policy Center
An independent study of the economic impacts of Washington’s 2025 tax increases – the largest in state history – is projected to reduce economic growth by half a percent of state GDP and cut wages by about $3.7 billion in 2026. The impact grows to a reduction of 1.2 percent in state GDP and $8.5 billion in lost wages by 2029.

The macroeconomic analysis was completed by Infisum, a Washington state firm that has produced research for the Washington State Department of Natural Resources. The model is based on those used by the World Bank, McKinsey, the U.S. government and others.
You can read the full study here.
The 2025 tax increases continued the state’s trend toward becoming one of the worst states in the nation for business and innovation. WPC’s Report Card for Washington’s Future highlights the serious decline over the past 15 years, with the state falling from the 6th best business tax climate in 2014 to 45th in the nation last year. Washington also has the highest rate of small business failure in the nation over the past five years, and one of the highest over the past decade.
The study found that the largest hit to economic growth comes from the increases in the Business and Occupation tax (B&O) and applying the state sales tax to services. The study also found that those two policies are projected to reduce wage for skilled and unskilled workers by more than $2 billion in 2026, growing to nearly $6 billion in 2029.
Recognizing the impact those taxes had, legislators have started to undo some of the most damaging elements of those increases. For example, the legislature is likely to repeal the increase in the death tax, which made Washington state the highest rate in the nation by a large margin. Additionally, the proposed income tax legislation would repeal some of the B&O tax increases from last year.
The proposed supplemental budget assumes billions more in new tax revenue in addition to last year’s tax increases, compounding the damage done to Washington’s innovation economy and small businesses.
The legislature has painted itself into a corner with consistently large increases in spending that require large tax increases to keep the budget in balance. Those tax increases make the state more expensive and depress economic growth that is necessary to create jobs and sustainable sources of revenue.
Until the legislature and governor develop a spending plan that is sustainable and responsible, Washington will continue on the spiral of increased budgets requiring increased taxes that do more damage to the business climate.
Todd Myers is the vice president for research at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- POLL: Do you agree with requiring board members to follow council direction?Disagreement among county councilors centers on whether C-TRAN board members should reflect the council’s collective wishes or act independently, highlighting ongoing concerns about public accountability.
- 18th District lawmakers to host town hall meeting on Saturday, March 28, in Battle GroundStephanie McClintock and John Ley will meet with Battle Ground constituents to answer questions, review the new income tax, and discuss the effects of the $80 billion budget.
- Opinion: The legislature has committed $2.4 billion to recurring pension increases since 2018Six legislative COLAs have raised public employer costs by $2.38 billion since 2018, driving up unfunded pension liabilities and increasing burdens on county and city budgets.
- Opinion: ‘Just because they got away with it doesn’t mean they weren’t wrong’A Skamania County deputy’s report found violations of county rules and the Open Public Meetings Act, but no prosecutor acted on the findings.
- More drama at Clark County Council in regard to its representatives on the C-TRAN BoardCouncilors debated whether C-TRAN board representatives must follow group mandates, with Michelle Belkot refusing to commit to new voting rules and Glen Yung opposing her nomination.







