Elizabeth New (Hovde) believes recovering our state’s no-income-tax status would likely bring far more benefit both to economic growth and to state finances

Elizabeth New (Hovde)
Washington Policy Center

The well-respected Washington Research Council just released an economic analysis of Initiative 2109, the citizen-led ballot measure to repeal the capital gains income tax.

The study finds that if Initiative 2109 passes it would have minimal impact on the state’s ample revenue collections. The study notes that repeal would reduce future state revenues by only $424 million in 2024, and $820 million in 2025, and thus would not in any way reverse the rising rate of state tax collections. Lawmakers have so much money they added another $2 billion to state spending just a few months ago.

So opponents’ claim that the initiative would “cut” funding for “K-12 education and daycare” is false. That’s because state tax collections will continue to increase without the capital gains income tax. Even if the initiative passes, expect lawmakers to add another several billion in funding to state programs in the 2025 session.

Second, the Research Council finds that capital gains income tax revenue accounts for only about 1% of estimated general fund revenue (NGFO or Near General Fund Outlook). That means passage of Initiative 2109 would have negligible impact on Washington’s public finances.

Some lawmakers wail that losing the capital gains income tax will “devastate” (their word) state programs.  As any budget planner from the kitchen table to a multi-national company knows, if you can’t handle a 1% reduction among rising revenues you should turn the finances over to someone else.

The more we learn the more we see just how small the impact of ending this new tax would be. In fact, recovering our state’s no-income-tax status would likely bring far more benefit both to economic growth and to state finances.

The full Research Council analysis is just five pages and is well worth a look. 

Elizabeth New (Hovde) is a policy analyst and director of the Centers for Health Care and Worker Rights at the Washington Policy Center. She is a Clark County resident.

---

Also read:

• 
  Letter: Has $450 million been wasted on a bridge that’s too low for the Coast Guard with a foundation too costly to build?
  A Seattle engineer questions whether hundreds of millions of dollars have been spent on a bridge design he argues is unnecessarily risky and costly compared to an immersed tunnel alternative.
• 
  Opinion: Fix Washington – House Republicans lead the charge against liberal chaos
  Nancy Churchill argues that one-party Democratic control has driven up costs, weakened public safety, and harmed schools, and says House Republicans are offering a path forward through their Fix Washington agenda.
• 
  Opinion: Biden agreed with Trump on Maduro, so why aren’t liberals celebrating?
  Lars Larson questions why American Democrats are reacting with outrage to the arrest of Venezuelan dictator Nicholas Maduro despite prior bipartisan agreement on prosecuting him.
• 
  Letter: If I were a politician
  A Yacolt resident offers a sharply critical, satirical take on how he believes modern politicians misuse public trust, taxpayer dollars, and government power.
• 
  Opinion: Transit agencies need accountability not increased state subsidy
  Charles Prestrud argues that Washington transit agencies face rising costs and declining ridership due to governance structures that lack public accountability.