Elizabeth New (Hovde) believes recovering our state’s no-income-tax status would likely bring far more benefit both to economic growth and to state finances

Elizabeth New (Hovde)
Washington Policy Center

The well-respected Washington Research Council just released an economic analysis of Initiative 2109, the citizen-led ballot measure to repeal the capital gains income tax.

The study finds that if Initiative 2109 passes it would have minimal impact on the state’s ample revenue collections. The study notes that repeal would reduce future state revenues by only $424 million in 2024, and $820 million in 2025, and thus would not in any way reverse the rising rate of state tax collections. Lawmakers have so much money they added another $2 billion to state spending just a few months ago.

So opponents’ claim that the initiative would “cut” funding for “K-12 education and daycare” is false. That’s because state tax collections will continue to increase without the capital gains income tax. Even if the initiative passes, expect lawmakers to add another several billion in funding to state programs in the 2025 session.

Second, the Research Council finds that capital gains income tax revenue accounts for only about 1% of estimated general fund revenue (NGFO or Near General Fund Outlook). That means passage of Initiative 2109 would have negligible impact on Washington’s public finances.

Some lawmakers wail that losing the capital gains income tax will “devastate” (their word) state programs.  As any budget planner from the kitchen table to a multi-national company knows, if you can’t handle a 1% reduction among rising revenues you should turn the finances over to someone else.

The more we learn the more we see just how small the impact of ending this new tax would be. In fact, recovering our state’s no-income-tax status would likely bring far more benefit both to economic growth and to state finances.

The full Research Council analysis is just five pages and is well worth a look. 

Elizabeth New (Hovde) is a policy analyst and director of the Centers for Health Care and Worker Rights at the Washington Policy Center. She is a Clark County resident.

---

Also read:

• 
  POLL: Do you support Vancouver’s decision to restore open public comment at every council meeting starting in 2026?
  Vancouver will restore open public comment at every council meeting in 2026 after years of limiting remarks to agenda items.
• 
  Opinion: Washington is bleeding taxpayers and now a State Representative wants to make it worse
  Mark Harmsworth argues that a proposed statewide payroll tax would worsen Washington’s ongoing loss of jobs, businesses, and economic competitiveness.
• 
  Opinion: Simultaneous left turns
  Doug Dahl explains how Washington law directs drivers to make simultaneous left turns by passing to the left of each other in an intersection.
• 
  Opinion: WEA secret meeting about opposing the initiatives gets leaked
  An opinion from Let’s Go Washington criticizes a leaked Washington Education Association meeting about opposing LGW’s initiatives on girls’ sports and school transparency.
• 
  Opinion: Kitchen table advocacy – Influence the legislature from home
  Nancy Churchill encourages citizens to influence the Washington State Legislature from home by focusing on committees, building small advocacy teams, and engaging positively with legislators.