Elizabeth New (Hovde) believes recovering our state’s no-income-tax status would likely bring far more benefit both to economic growth and to state finances

Elizabeth New (Hovde)
Washington Policy Center

The well-respected Washington Research Council just released an economic analysis of Initiative 2109, the citizen-led ballot measure to repeal the capital gains income tax.

The study finds that if Initiative 2109 passes it would have minimal impact on the state’s ample revenue collections. The study notes that repeal would reduce future state revenues by only $424 million in 2024, and $820 million in 2025, and thus would not in any way reverse the rising rate of state tax collections. Lawmakers have so much money they added another $2 billion to state spending just a few months ago.

So opponents’ claim that the initiative would “cut” funding for “K-12 education and daycare” is false. That’s because state tax collections will continue to increase without the capital gains income tax. Even if the initiative passes, expect lawmakers to add another several billion in funding to state programs in the 2025 session.

Second, the Research Council finds that capital gains income tax revenue accounts for only about 1% of estimated general fund revenue (NGFO or Near General Fund Outlook). That means passage of Initiative 2109 would have negligible impact on Washington’s public finances.

Some lawmakers wail that losing the capital gains income tax will “devastate” (their word) state programs.  As any budget planner from the kitchen table to a multi-national company knows, if you can’t handle a 1% reduction among rising revenues you should turn the finances over to someone else.

The more we learn the more we see just how small the impact of ending this new tax would be. In fact, recovering our state’s no-income-tax status would likely bring far more benefit both to economic growth and to state finances.

The full Research Council analysis is just five pages and is well worth a look. 

Elizabeth New (Hovde) is a policy analyst and director of the Centers for Health Care and Worker Rights at the Washington Policy Center. She is a Clark County resident.

---

Also read:

• 
  Opinion: Transit agencies need accountability not increased state subsidy
  Charles Prestrud argues that Washington transit agencies face rising costs and declining ridership due to governance structures that lack public accountability.
• 
  Letter: ‘For years, American foreign policy too often felt like a blank check’
  Vancouver resident Peter Bracchi argues that the 2025 National Security Strategy marks a long-overdue shift toward clearer priorities, shared responsibility, and interest-based American leadership.
• 
  POLL: Are you better off than you were a year ago?
  This week’s poll asks readers to reflect on their personal financial situation and whether they feel better off than they were a year ago as economic conditions continue to shift.
• 
  Opinion: Does tailgating cause speeding?
  Target Zero Manager Doug Dahl examines whether tailgating contributes to speeding and explains why following too closely increases crash risk with little benefit.
• 
  Opinion: ‘The Democrats’ part of the bargain’
  Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance reflects on a New Year’s Eve encounter and a Bill Maher commentary to assess what he sees as cultural and political changes from the past year.