![Elizabeth Hovde of the Washington Policy Center points out that instead of patient-centered health decisions about COVID-19, made between doctors and patients, we have costly and coercive state giveaways.](https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/large_Clark-County-Today-shot-of-a-lifetime-banner.jpg)
Elizabeth Hovde of the Washington Policy Center points out that instead of patient-centered health decisions about COVID-19, made between doctors and patients, we have costly and coercive state giveaways
Elizabeth Hovde
Washington Policy Center
Remember last summer when the state was acting like Oprah and giving away prizes to people for getting vaccines? “You get a game system!” “You get tuition!” “You win the lottery!”
![Elizabeth Hovde](https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Clark-County-Today-HovdeMug-1.jpg)
My teenage boys were disappointed it didn’t work out for me. It did for others. Washington state gave away more than $2 million in prizes as incentives for Washingtonians to get COVID-19 vaccines before the state’s “reopening.” It included a $1 million grand prize called the “Shot of a lifetime.” All you had to do to get in the sweepstakes was be a state resident and be one of the people in the state who had received a shot.
I was reminded of the state’s bribing activity of 2021 when reading a press release from the governor’s office last week. It said the governor was updating his directive that boosters would be added to his vaccine mandate. Instead of requiring the boosters, the press release explained, “The updated directive reflects feedback and recommendations from state employees and labor partners to pursue options for offering incentives for COVID-19 boosters instead of making them a requirement.”
A June 30 Inslee directive made the vaccine mandate permanent and added a booster requirement for new and current executive and small-cabinet agency employees. That is the directive that was updated. The Office of Financial Management (OFM) was said to be in the process of bargaining with labor, and more information would be on the way regarding the incentives and their implementation. Read more in my blog here.
Prizes and incentives — not patient-centered health decisions
Given what we now know about COVID-19 and the vaccines’ limitations, some people are calling the governor’s mandate and the booster addition a thinly-veiled political test. While vaccines and boosters help fight severe illness, after all, they do not stop the spread or contraction of the disease.
Whether or not these employment requirements are some sort of political test, it’s disturbing that nothing has gotten in the way of Inslee insisting on his outdated vaccine mandate before this labor pressure — not the outcry of workers who lost their careers or suffering state service levels. Instead of patient-centered health decisions about COVID-19, made between doctors and patients, we have costly and coercive state giveaways.
Elizabeth Hovde is a policy analyst and the director of the Centers for Health Care and Worker Rights at the Washington Policy Center. She is a Clark County resident.
Also read:
- Opinion: OIC tells consumers not to pay for ‘insurance’ you won’t likely benefit from: Does that include WA Cares?Elizabeth New (Hovde) of the Washington Policy Center believes you should consider yourself warned by the Office of the Insurance Commissioner about WA Cares and its maybe-only benefit.
- Opinion: Same road, different speed limit?Target Zero Manager Doug Dahl addresses a question about speed limit signs going into and leaving town.
- Opinion: Hiding the growing cost of the Interstate Bridge replacementJoe Cortright of the City Observatory addresses the rising cost of the Interstate 5 Bridge replacement project.
- Letter: ‘This election I am NOT voting for Greg Cheney’Clark County resident Wynn Grcich shares her thoughts on Rep. Greg Cheney and the issue of fluoridation in area drinking water.
- POLL: Should biological males who identify as females be allowed to compete in athletic events against biological females?Should biological males who identify as females be allowed to compete in athletic events against biological females?