Jason Mercier of the Washington Policy Center explains why Washington has consistently ranked as having relatively stable tax collections compared to other states
Jason Mercier
Washington Policy Center
The State Treasurer put out a press release last week highlighting Washington’s strong credit rating and the impact on bond sale savings. The Treasurer said this about Standard and Poor’s (S&P) credit rating for the state:
“S&P Global Ratings affirmed its long-term and underlying ratings, characterizing Washington’s credit profile by its strong fiscal management practices, including strong forecasting, a history of timely budget adjustments adapting to changes in forecasts. S&P, Moody’s and Fitch are the three largest rating agencies today. These agencies rate the creditworthiness of both private enterprises and governments throughout the world.”
Another thing that S&P said was a credit strength for Washington is the relatively low volatility of our tax collections due to no state income tax. S&P said:
“The ratings reflect our view of Washington’s: Sales tax-based revenue structure, which has demonstrated less sensitivity to economic cycles than income tax-reliant states…”
Though there is no recession-proof tax structure, Washington has consistently ranked as having relatively stable tax collections compared to other states. The reason for this is Washington’s three major tax sources (sales, gross receipts, and property) are among the least volatile taxes. Graduated income taxes, however, are the most volatile taxes. The worst of these for volatility are capital gains income taxes.
The extreme volatility of capital gains income taxes is well known by tax experts. When issuing Washington’s August 2019 bond credit rating Standard & Poor’s noted:
“Washington’s revenues have historically exhibited less cyclicality than others (due in part to the lack of a personal income tax) . . . we have observed that capital gains-related tax revenues are among the most cyclical and difficult to forecast revenues in numerous other states.”
Washington’s Department of Revenue also warned in 2012:
“Capital gains are extremely volatile from year to year.”
It is also important to remember that the state’s Department of Commerce previously said not that having a capital gains income tax “is great marketing” for Washington. Commerce warned in 2018 that imposing a capital gains income tax would mean “one less tool that we have in our economic development toolbox.”
Despite recently scrubbing any mention of no state income tax from its “Choose Washington” webpage, here is what Commerce previously said on the site:
- December 13, 2012: “We offer businesses some competitive advantages found in few other states. These include no taxes on capital gains or personal or corporate income. We also offer industry-specific tax breaks to spur innovation and growth whenever possible.”
- May 1, 2015: “We offer businesses some competitive advantages found in few other states. This includes no personal or corporate income tax. We also offer industry-specific tax breaks to spur innovation and growth whenever possible.” – You’ll note the reference to no capital gains tax was removed (here is what Commerce said then when asked why).
Despite the recent website changes, Commerce is still making no state income tax pitches to employers in direct presentations using this:
S&P says no income tax is a credit strength for Washington, and Commerce has advertised it as being a competitive advantage. Let’s hope the state supreme court doesn’t mess with a good thing with the capital gains income tax lawsuit, especially since voters have been crystal clear on their opposition to income taxes.
Jason Mercier is the director of the Center for Government Reform at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- POLL: Do the proposed changes to the Clark County Council’s Rules of Procedure suggest the council lacked authority in 2025?
A new reader poll asks whether proposed changes to the Clark County Council’s Rules of Procedure indicate the council lacked clear authority during a 2025 board removal. - Letter: ‘HSD needs to give a detailed line-item accounting of where the last levy went, and of how they plan to use this one’
Randall Schultz-Rathbun urges Hockinson School District to provide detailed, transparent accounting of past and proposed levy spending before asking voters for additional funds. - Letter: Interstate Bridge Replacement’s Park & Ride insanity
Bob Ortblad criticizes the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program’s proposed Park & Ride garages, arguing the costs are excessive and unlikely to receive federal funding. - Opinion: Vancouver councilors responsible for stoking irrational fears in the community
Clark County Today Editor Ken Vance sharply criticizes a Vancouver City Council declaration on immigration enforcement, arguing it fuels fear, undermines law enforcement, and lacks supporting evidence. - Opinion: Washington should stop shielding domestic abusers and sexual offenders from deportation
Vancouver attorney Angus Lee argues Washington law improperly shields convicted domestic abusers, sexual offenders, and drunk drivers from deportation and urges lawmakers to change it.
