Mark Harmsworth explains that the property tax increase would make housing less affordable, working against many other efforts to help reduce rental and mortgage costs

Mark Harmsworth
Washington Policy Center

Senate Bill 5770 (SB 5770), apparently won’t be voted on this year according to its author, Senator Jamie Pederson, D-Seattle. The bill would have removed the 1% limit on annual property tax increases.

In 2001, Initiative 747, which limited property tax increases to 1% per year, was passed by the voters of Washington by a margin of 58% to 42%. Prior to passage of the initiative, cities and counties were able to raise property taxes by 6% per year and many cities and counties did so every year. After legal action struck the initiative down at the Washington Supreme Court, the legislature was called into special session by Governor Christine Gregoire and subsequently reinstated the cap with 85% of both chambers voting in the affirmative.

The Association of Washington Cities, which is funded in part with taxpayer dollars, was advocating for the tax increase.

Washington property owners already struggling with massive property tax increases, driven by high property values and tax increases over the last few years, would have seen their taxes go up even further. Each year the 3% increase is applied would compound the revenue the state and local municipalities would receive, and homeowners would pay.

The property tax increase will make housing less affordable, working against many other efforts to help reduce rental and mortgage costs.

The state is bringing in record tax revenues, for 2024 the estimate is $71 billion per bi-annum which is an increase of $27 billion over the last 5 years. The state does not need to increase property taxes. A property tax cut instead, evenly applied, would help with affordability in the rental and homeowner real estate market.

Lawmakers need to get serious about housing affordability instead of hurting the homeowners and renters of Washington by arbitrarily increasing taxes.

Mark Harmsworth is the director of the Small Business Center at the Washington Policy Center.

---

Also read:

• 
  Opinion: Seven Things You Need to Know About the Governor’s Budget Proposal
  Ryan Frost outlines seven key issues in Gov. Bob Ferguson’s proposed 2026 supplemental budget, focusing on taxes, spending growth, and long-term fiscal risks.
• 
  Opinion: Hidden costs, withheld documents, and a $17 billion question – Why the Interstate Bridge Replacement demands immediate oversight
  Gary Clark argues that withheld documents, rising cost estimates, and rejected alternatives show the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program requires immediate independent oversight.
• 
  Letter: Hockinson is a ‘strong community and strong schools protect strong property values’
  Brush Prairie resident Brush Prairie resident Brian Hebert argues that approving the Hockinson SP&O Replacement Levy is essential to protecting property values, community stability, and strong local schools.argues that approving the Hockinson SP&O Replacement Levy is essential to protecting property values, community stability, and strong local schools.
• 
  Opinion: The IBR’s $10-$12 billion funding problem and lack of truthfulness
  Rep. John Ley argues that escalating costs, funding shortfalls, and withheld information have undermined public and legislative confidence in the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program.
• 
  POLL: With updated estimates reaching as high as $17.7 billion, what should happen to the I-5 Bridge replacement project?
  A new poll asks readers how the I-5 Bridge replacement project should proceed amid higher cost estimates and questions about transparency within the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program.