Opinion: ‘Requiring private Washington businesses to determine an employee’s medical status based on government guidance is outrageous’

Mark Harmsworth, of the Washington Policy Center, shares his thoughts on the decision of the Inslee administration to require vaccine passports in the workplace to be enforced by business owners

Concept of global vaccination passport. Certificate for those who received the coronavirus vaccine

This opinion piece was produced and first published by the Washington Policy Center. It is published here with the permission of and full attribution to the Washington Policy Center. 

Mark Harmsworth
Mark Harmsworth

Mark Harmsworth
Washington Policy Center

New COVID workplace restrictions, issued by Washington State Labor and Industries (L&I) late last Friday (May 21), require employers to check employee vaccine documents before allowing relaxation of social distancing and mask requirements in the workplace.

The new state rules require an employer to confirm, and have employees prove their vaccine medical status. The process used to verify vaccination, and the medical status of the employee’s vaccination record, including the employee medical information must be made available for L&I for inspection. Vaccination status can be collected in several ways, including daily checks, attestation from the employee and documentation from a health professional or state immunization information system.

Most troubling though, is the L&I rule that an employee badge or credential be marked to show vaccination status, a clear violation of medical privacy.

The rules also do not allow any medical, personal or religious exemptions.

By requiring a vaccine passport, the new L&I rules place businesses and nonprofit organizations in a difficult position. The rules require them to discriminate against people who may not be vaccinated for medical, religious or personal reasons.

This would have a similar harmful effect as the failed contact tracing rule that was tried by the state in mid-2020. Contract tracing was highly unpopular, failed to gain traction and state officials ultimately abandoned it.

Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories (SEL), a company of scientists and engineers based in Pullman, has written to Governor Jay Inslee, asking him to repeal the L&I rules. SEL has already, voluntarily, been following CDC workplace guidelines and has required non-vaccinated employees to wear masks. SEL, however, is opposed to the mandatory collection of private medical information and the subsequent sharing of that information with state government officials and articulately voices what thousands of other business owners are now thinking after learning about these new rules.

The ability for employees to work unhindered is guaranteed under the 14th amendment of the U.S. Constitution. It states,

“No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

Certainly, a requirement that a business determine the vaccination status for every employee, and subsequently require masks for some and not others, abridges the rights of Washington residents and the businesses owners themselves.

This is not only a moral affront; it is an unnecessary overreach by the state. Requiring private Washington businesses to determine an employee’s medical status based on government guidance is outrageous. Business owners should determine how they want to operate their own workplace safely.

The final, and frankly, disturbing suggestion from L&I to mark an employee identification with their vaccination status, creates a discriminatory class system for employees.

The safety of Washington residents is of course important but both residents and business owners have been sensible in their approach to the COVID-19 crisis and can obviously self-regulate to keep their businesses and our communities safe. Small business owners will continue to voluntarily do everything they need to do to keep their guests and employees safe.

Other diseases, some that are more contagious than COVID-19, do not require proof of vaccination before an employee can work, unrestricted. Why should COVID-19 be the exception?

It is not the state’s responsibility to make medical decisions for its residents and then restrict the freedom to work and conduct commerce based on those decisions.

The state should not be requiring businesses and organizations to determine employee’s medical status and make people wear a special badge to enforce government rules before being allowed to conduct business without restrictions.

The state’s L&I rules are a clear overreach of state government and should be repealed immediately.

Mark Harmsworth is the director of the Small Business Center at the Washington Policy Center.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Janet Sedy
Guest
Janet Sedy
4 months ago

Did you know that right now in the US, there are more people infected with tuberculosis than with Covid-19? Yet, we don’t commonly vaccinate people for this disease that kills about 50% of those who become infected by it, nor does anyone ever ask if an employee if they are TB positive. We never walked around wearing masks because we were worried about TB, either. So you have to ask, why all this for Covid-19 when there is a 98% or greater survivability rate for the working population? Is it truly about safety? No, otherwise we’d be worried about TB. It’s about control. Incidentally, just because an entity is not a government entity does not give them immunity from being under the law of the US Constitution.

Last edited 4 months ago by Janet Sedy
Sue Mobley
Guest
Sue Mobley
4 months ago

go ahead and fire me…. I’ll take that extra $300 unemployment…

Leslie Jean Chasse
Guest
Leslie Jean Chasse
3 months ago

Had there not been such an anti-science, anti-liberal movement against vaccinations, none of which is based on any established, verified and accepted science, we would not even be having this discussion today.

Last edited 3 months ago by Leslie Jean Chasse
3
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x